Category Archives: Zionism


“Written by “By Richard Silverstein

Secret NSA Satellite Facility Located at IDF Base in Occupied East Jerusalem

It’s common to hear when Israeli prime ministers travel to the White House that there isn’t ‘an inch of daylight’ between Israel and the U.S.  That’s how damn close we are.  It’s one thing (and troubling enough) to say this about political issues.  But now it appears that our respective intelligence operations are increasingly coordinated and overlapping.  Of course, there continues to be intensive spying by Israeli agents within the U.S. (Pollard and others agents exposed over the years following testify to this).   But increasingly there appears to be no reason for Israel to attempt to penetrate U.S. security as we’re willing to give it to give them the store.

Yesterday, I reported that Israeli security correspondent Ronen Bergman had revealed the NSA maintained a secret facility in Jerusalem that monitored all U.S. satellites.  I also reported something not in Bergman’s interview: that this base was part of another secret agreement allowing Israel to share in all intelligence information produced as part of the Five Eyes network.  In effect, Israel has become the Sixth Eye.

Working with an Israeli researcher, I’m publishing the first known picture of the facility, which is located on Martin Buber Street near the Hebrew University campus on Mt. Scopus.  This is one of the highest points in Jerusalem and would offer the best vantage point to receive and transmit signals to space satellites.  The NSA facility is located within an IDF SIGINT base called Ofrit, which intercepts telecommunications throughout the West Bank.  Frankly, I’ve never heard of a U.S. intelligence facility housed within an Israeli military base.  This brings home even more strongly how little separation there now is between Israeli and American intelligence operations.  Or to paraphrase Lennon-McCartney: I am you and “you are me and we are all together.”

nsa jerusalem baseSecret NSA satellite base on Jerusalem’s Mt. Scopus (running along Armistice Line towards upper right corner)

You can see the photo of the Ofrit base above, which was labeled by the photographer as Galey Tzahal (Army Radio).  An official government map of the area displayed below shows the site censored (blurred).  Ironically, Israel doesn’t trust its own citizens to be able to see information which Google thinks its users are mature enough to be able to handle.  Thankfully, it hasn’t joined the censorship brigade (yet).

Note, in the uncensored image that the facility is located across the Green Line in Palestinian territory, which makes it in effect a U.S. partner in the Occupation.  Also note that we officially disapprove of the Occupation (supposedly).

For any Israeli security officials reading this, the photographer clearly didn’t know what he was photographing, nor did he approach me or have any contact with me, and shouldn’t be blamed for violating any Israeli secrecy regimen (if there is one).

israel map censoring nsa baseIsraeli government map censoring NSA facility

In my earlier post about this facility, I spoke in detail about the Five Eyes intelligence sharing regime of which Israel has become a quasi-official member.  A reporter to whom I sent this story pointed out another reason why the U.S. may feel it advantageous to include Israel in such protocols.  Readers will recall that during the 1967 War, when Israel and the U.S. had no such agreements, we sent the U.S.S. Liberty to monitor Egyptian and Israeli communications traffic from the battlefield.  This was the best and only way we had for knowing what each side was doing or planning.  Apparently, the Israelis didn’t appreciate our efforts and attacked the ship, killing many U.S. sailors and presumably intelligence officers.  It’s very possible that this mishap influenced future policymakers to map out a data-sharing arrangement so that we don’t need to jeopardize our own personnel in monitoring each other’s strategic goals and intentions.

It is, of course, ironic that the base is located on a street named for Martin Buber.  He was one of the co-founders of the Brit Shalom movement, and would’ve detested everything that this base, and overall government surveillance represents.  It’s also ironic the base sits next to one of Israel’s leading institutions of higher learning.  Imagine a secret NSA base located next door to Harvard or Radcliffe (though I do realize stranger things have happened).  But then again, this is Israel and not the Ivy League!

I’ve attempted to get a comment from the State Department and White House press offices about this story.  So far, they haven’t responded.  Perhaps this story will encourage them.


Zionist Wars for a Greater Israel


Most timid Americans would avoid any serious discussion on the true causes of a continuous failed foreign policy that only benefits Israel while costing our own country any chance of real national security and a prosperous society. The mere mention of the term Jew is usually enough for being banded to the back of the room and shunned as one of those haters. Unfortunately, President Trump has succumbed to this fallacious political correctness. In order to correctly understand the framework of the detrimental circumstances that propagate the decline of the American Empire, the clear-headed observer must confront why the United States remains a vassal to the Zionist myth that Israel is a valuable ally to our country.

Essentially the question boils down to a sober outlook. Does one place the interests of the foreign agents that swear allegiance to Israel above that of America, or are you content to bow to the dictates of Zionism, especially when they directly conflict with the betterment of our own people?

A genuine America First mindset rejects both attitudes and rests upon a basic non-interventionism whenever possible. In the case of Israel, there is no germane special interest that places their objectives above ours. Yet, the facts of the matter are that the practical reality in domestic politics has a virtual Jewish veto factor that makes wimps out of even the most courageous warriors. At the end of the cultural and governmental administration process; the influence of the pro-Zionist media, legal and court system, the Wall Street cabals of Banksters, socially progressive academia, culturally correct government schools, Big Corporatist Business and Christian-Zionist apostates all promote and perpetuate that Israel is a friend.

Ask yourself, exactly what did America gain by our involvement from decades of Middle East conflicts or from the trillions of dollars spent on bribes or military campaigns and deployments? The honest answer is nothing. We have been under the yoke of intimidation from the primary victimhood industry post World War II; namely the impact from false guilt to compensate for the hyperbolic holocaust claims that doom any objective discussion on the Khazar exodus to Palestine.

The final solution for these proclaimed Jews is to establish a Zionist political region within the expanses of the Middle East.

Global Research published this document pertaining to the formation of “Greater Israel” constitutes the cornerstone of powerful Zionist factions within the current Netanyahu government,  the Likud party, as well as within the Israeli military and intelligence establishment. (Article first published by Global Research on April 29, 2013). “Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East. Reading this account which includes documentation by Israel Shahak and Oded Yinon will be ignored by most proponents and apologists for the Zionist State.

In the case of one of the most repulsive supporters of this bellicose apartheid regime, Daniel Pipes casts dispersions and objections in his 1994 account, Imperial Israel: The Nile-to-Euphrates Calumny. His exceptions to the historic reality that is the basis of this eternal conflict are all based upon a condition of denial and a fraudulent defense for the rogue band of supremacists.

“Turning to the United States, reducing apprehensions about Greater Israel is good American policy. Americans agree it’s in the their interest to end the Arab-Israeli conflict; because the fantasy of Greater Israel impedes resolution of that conflict, American diplomats and politicians should seize every opportunity to calm fears among their Arab and Iranian counterparts that Israel plans to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. Here are a few steps for U.S. officials to keep in mind:”

Piper goes on to instruct how American foreign policy should shield Israel from the crucial criticisms that only benefit the Khazars who pretend to be descendants of Abraham. How many times have you heard such sophistry that attempts to shame you into supporting what Revelation 3:9 calls the synagogue of Satan and if that does not work, condemn opponents to the Talmud Temple as anti-Semitic?

Not since the hundred years of the Balfour Declaration, or the regret acknowledged by Harry Truman in caving to ‘fanatical’ Zionist lobby by recognizing Israel, has the announcement by President Trump recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital caused the conditions ripe for ‘major catastrophe‘.

Palestinian Envoy Warns: Trump Move on Jerusalem a ‘Declaration of War’ reports comments on Trump’s decision made by Manuel Hassassian in a BBC radio interview.

“He is declaring war in the Middle East, he is declaring war against 1.5 billion Muslims (and) hundreds of millions of Christians that are not going to accept the holy shrines to be totally under the hegemony of Israel,” Hassassian added.

Reaction from the UK follows.

In the meantime, Britain itself expressed concern over the change in American policy on Jerusalem, with Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson saying: “We view reports that we’ve heard with concern.”

He told reporters at NATO headquarters in Brussels on Wednesday that Britain thinks “Jerusalem obviously should be part of the final settlement between the Israelis and the Palestinians — a negotiated settlement that we want to see.”

The actual Statement by President Trump on Jerusalem on the surface seems reasonable. However, the needed question that begs a rational answer asks: What existential benefit does the United States gain from such reorganization without a comprehensive peace agreement among all parties within the region?

Manifestly, we all know that it would take divine intervention to achieve this objective. Sorry, even for the most avid Trump supporters, we all will have to wait for the Second Coming.

WikiTribune spoke to Stephen Walt, a Harvard professor of political science and controversial critic of the influence of pro-Israeli lobby groups on U.S. policy. This interview includes, Trump’s Jerusalem policy driven by groups who ‘see themselves as defenders of a greater Israel’.

Q: What does Trump gain from the policy change?

I’m not sure, to be perfectly honest. I think that most people that are skeptical about this change don’t see enormous benefits.

Obviously it will make the people, like Sheldon Adelson, who were pushing him to do this, happy, and this guarantees their support. You could argue this nails down support among the evangelical community and the right wing parts of the American Jewish community. By taking this largely symbolic step he solidifies that base a little bit.

You could also argue that this shows he’s a man of his word – he made a promise in the campaign and now he’s going to fulfil it.

But in a larger sense it’s not clear what the United States or really anybody actually gains from this, or why he chose to do it at this moment.

Now who among the ranks of the State Department can provide a distinct and clear response on how this departure will bring a positive improvement within the region?

Surely, President Trump’s response does not provide that clarity.

“After more than two decades of waivers, we are no closer to a lasting peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. It would be folly to assume that repeating the exact same formula would now produce a different or better result.

 Therefore, I have determined that it is time to officially recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.”

 Well, the Guardian item Hamas presents new charter accepting a Palestine based on 1967 borders presents a seeming breakthrough, but of course no olive branch goes unpunished in the Israeli border disputes.

“The new document states the Islamist movement it is not seeking war with the Jewish people – only with Zionism that drives the occupation of Palestine.

The new document also insists that Hamas is a not a revolutionary force that seeks to intervene in other countries, a commitment that is likely to be welcomed by other states such as Egypt.

The policy platform was announced by the head of the movement’s political bureau, Khaled Meshal, at a press conference in Doha. “Hamas advocates the liberation of all of Palestine but is ready to support the state on 1967 borders without recognising Israel or ceding any rights,” he said.”

And what was the response from Israel?

“Israel rejected the document before its full publication, with a spokesman for the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, saying: “Hamas is attempting to fool the world, but it will not succeed.” 

Maybe this is the actual folly that President Trump makes reference to in his White House statement. So why should America care about Israeli’s belligerent chutzpah? Must have something to do with genuflecting to AIPAC.

The Zionists are the driving force behind the covert creation of ISIS and the Mossad is the disruption operations behind making Iran the next target for the Amerika’s legions so the Israelis can further their plan for their own Shalom. This diabolical alliance will end in a radioactive cloud. But when that happens the irony will be missed by most brainwashed mass media news followers. The nukes the Zionists will use came from the U.S. labs, paid for by U.S. taxpayers and delivered by U.S. military technology.


Liberalism is Communism – How the Militant Communists Took Over New Zealand


The communist ‘revolution’ is well underway in New Zealand today – disguised as ‘Liberalism’ and ‘Multiculturalism’.

These people, by some accounts all closely related to each other, have seeped over the unprotected NZ borders over recent years and work in a team to protect each other and affirm their own  criminal behavior, as they carry out their coordinated “long march” to gain control over all Government and private business  agendas. We have seen the odd very wrong immigration decision (bribery) play out in the news, but only the very tip of the iceberg. The communist takeover of New Zealand was announced some time back and they have been flooding in ever since, aided by their network of ‘comrades’ in high places, setting up and/or infiltrating all sides of the so called ‘debate’.

“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves” – Lenin

It is essentially a holocaust playing out before our very eyes now – a war on the ‘natives’ of this land – both Maori and European – the same across the entire West that they are at war with – and rest assured they are all making money out of the process – selling off the ‘gold teeth’ of their victims if you will.

These militant communists are poisoning your food with dangerous / toxic chemicals and additives, polluting all of your food and drinks with toxic plastics designed to lower the fertility rates and cause cancers, poisoning your water supply with sodium fluoride, spraying the air with poisonous chemicals, importing the meth and getting it to market via the gangs and police, turning your daughters into crack whores then aborting their unwanted babies, kidnapping your children via the family courts, making you homeless via their banking system and free trade agreements, making you poorer with their money printing and counterfeiting, and turning your children into dumbed down mind control iphone slaves via their Hollywood bullshit and  ‘liberal’ programming. They are now even allegedly adding aborted baby fetus cells to the “natural flavours” in some of your favorite and most common foods. That includes many of the fast food companies. They hate you and your offspring with a passion.

They posed as capitalists for a long time, but capitalism is long dead now – the death knell of their capitalist system was when they staged the 2008 Global Financial Crisis and then used your tax money to bail out the banks. They now pretty much own everything – the entire corrupt corporate system, allowing them to put the poisons in your food and drinks and enforce racist & undemocratic policies via the Government that they control – such as unrestrained immigration polices and home loan restrictions for ‘natives’ – designed to impoverish and kill off the locals as they import and support the new immigrants who will take your place, and using your tax money to fund it.

We see their racist employment practices in most of the large corporates these days, from the courier companies to the gas stations, supermarkets and even state run companies such as NZ Post – they now give preference to immigrants over the ‘natives’. The corrupt Prime Minister Bill English even goes on record and suggests Kiwis are drug addicts to explain away this state sponsored racismBill English apparently spends a lot of spare time with Nick Smith MP, so we have a hunch he may also be ‘compromised’.

The government’s finger prints are all over the meth industry – in the least they are allowing the stuff to be imported and readily available, before blaming you for the problem. And they are turning your daughters into crack whores in the process.

They hate us and are quite openly at war with us, but it would be ‘politically incorrect’ to admit it. The ‘immigrants’ we refer to are often their victims also its important to note – people trafficking victims essentially, forced out of their own homelands by illegal wars, ethnic cleansing and financial terrorism carried out by the global banking mafia. They are being bought in to replace us and become the new compliant tax paying slaves in this foreign banker run plantation.

Their capitalist model was only a vehicle to take their communism global anyway – and as soon as they had completed using it to consolidate all resources and take over all nations, they swiftly staged the GFC and are now implementing their global communist model – a plan hundreds of years in the making – and some say even promised to them by their ‘God’

“”For the LORD your God will bless you as He has promised you, and you will lend to many nations, but you will not borrow; and you will rule over many nations, but they will not rule over you.”

Apparently their God is an International banker and real estate mogul.

In fact, if you want to go back a bit further, their “Long March” to take over all Western institutions really took hold with the passing of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 – giving this private inbred group of criminals control over the largest bank in the World. Ever since then we have seen never ending wars and ever increasing debt., mixed with all sorts of mindless entertainment & booze to keep us all distracted as they spread their tentacles like some sort of parasitic disease.

Now that they have near complete control – and as with all previous communist regimes – we are starting to see the inequality, the perversion, the poverty, the homelessness, the drug addiction and other social ills – and their child abuse. Not sure what it is with these people but child abuse seems to be of big interest to them – abortion being their favorite form  of child abuse – the ultimate form.

They even staged the 911 attacks and entire ‘radical Islam’ and ‘war on terror’ hoaxes as an excuse to spy on you and take away your privacy and other rights.They are even spying on your children, like a pedophile ring would do. Rest assured Islamification is part of their longer term plan, but they long ago infiltrated that region and religion also.

They have pumped all of the fools with their Hollywood crap, their debaucherous music industry, iPhones and iPads and their free porn and sex sex sex everywhere, as they have led them all blindly down the track to total state mind control- working hand in hand with the corporations which they own and control.

The average brainwashed fool is still focused on the many distractions these criminals throw out to confuse the people of the Nations they are taking over – Trump, Aliens, Nasa, climate change, etc – all mind control bullshit designed to confuse the public as they are farmed, murdered & replaced –  the same agenda as all communist regimes of the past. That is its purpose – population control and re population. Or just plan mass murder in simple terms.

Bishop Williamson explains that liberalism is communism:

Bishop Williamson excommunicated (pun not intended) after questioning the official holocaust numbers

Brendon O’Connell’s views on this communist takeover of the West:

Lawful Disclaimer – Media Whores supports freedom of speech.


(Flashback) Libya’s Gold Reserves of 100+ Tons Have Been Stolen by Bankers

As stated repeatedly, there are only three methods by which a government’s central bank (all, but a handful now in private banking cartels) can get custody of gold:

By Exchange for paper Substitutes

By Confiscation of private citizens

By Conquest
Knowing those alternatives which one are you going with?

Was the Libyan’s people’s gold being held in ‘safe custody’ with the US Fed, too? “So sollie my Libyan friends, you’re broke now.” Bye-bye ….

Who Stole 143 Tons of Gold From the Libyan People?

I admit that I don’t follow American politics as much as I should, at least not on a day-by-day basis.  It’s just too depressing.  Sometimes it reminds me of that famous Russian saying about  пауки в банке – “spiders in a jar”.  Meaning,  that if you force a bunch of spidies to live together in a jar, then they will cuddle and learn to peacefully coexist ….. NOT.  In this metaphor, it is understood that the spiders are the politicians, and the jar is the American political scene.  With various spiders running for President and trying to bite each other in the process.

And one of these spiders, maybe the biggest one, is named Hillary Clinton.  And apparently, this has been going on for some time, there was a big scandal whereby Clinton, when she was Obama’s Secretary of State, used her personal email account to conduct governmental affairs.  Therefore, there were lawsuits, or whatever, to force her to disclose these emails, because there are laws that official correspondence has to be properly stored in official archives.

Consequently, at the beginning of last month,  around 5,000 pages of the something-like 55,000 pages of Clinton’s “official/personal” correspondence have been published.  Clinton has withheld the lion’s share of the correspondence, but even the paltry stream that has seen the light of day, opens a sticky, filthy edge of the curtain on all the dirty, sticky, secret stuff that has been going on behind the scenes among the Rulers and Exceptional People such as Bubba’s Wife and the other trailer trash reknowned American political leaders.

This piece from VZGLIAD  is entitled:

Clinton’s Emails Have Disclosed the Real Reason for Gaddafi’s Overthrow

As a young man, Gaddafi had movie-star good looks.

Those of us who have memories slightly longer than that of a spider, remember how Libyan Leader Muammar Gaddafi was violently overthrown and murdered by rampaging jihadists, in 2011.  Along with Gaddafi, his entire family was either destroyed, assassinated, arrested, or sent into exile.

Gaddafi had led Libya for many years and even decades, patching together a successful and wealthy multi-ethnic, multi-tribal, but basically Arab state driven by quasi-socialist principles.  Based on the notions of an extensive social-welfare network and sharing the wealth.

Gaddafi was a decent man who doted on his family.

As he aged, Gaddafi lost his movie-star good looks – in his murder-video, it was revealed that he had lost his mop of curly hair and wore a wig – an old man’s vanity.  Also, as he aged, Gaddafi had cultivated an aura of eccentricity, which caused some Western pundits to peg him as crazy/unhinged; but underneath it all, Gaddafi still possessed that same keen intelligence which took an ex-colonial backwater like Libya, and turned it into an Arab-speaking nation of wealth and repute.  Libya enjoyed an excellent system of health and education.  Gaddafi’s government sponsored vast engineering projects which brought irrigation and made the desert bloom.  Libya was a powerful and wealthy country; and oil revenues were shared by the people.

Towards the end of Gaddafi’s life, before Clinton Happened, Libya had managed to accumulate 140 tons of sovereign gold.  The Libyan government planned to use that gold, not just to raise the living standard of Libyans themselves, but also as a development fund, to drive the economic development of sub-Saharan Africa as well.  Many important development projects were lined up and just waiting to kick-off.

The Empire Strikes Back

Well, according to the rules of the Colonial Empire, sub-Saharan Africans are not allowed to be successful.  Nor Arabs – unless they are Saudis or vassals of the Saudis. Therefore, Gaddafi had to go.

According to the VZGLIAD piece, Clinton’s correspondence reveals that the Americans were worried about Libya’s huge reserves of gold and oil.   Their chief worry was that Gaddafi — as he had sometimes promised to do — would use Libyan gold as the basis for a pan-African currency.  Which would have fit beautifully into the proposed pan-African development bank whose goal was to turn sub-Saharan Africa, especially the African “Francophone” nations, into “tiger-states” of economic boom.

These plans were seen to go against the interests of both the U.S. and also its vassal, France, which was eager to regain military/economic influence in its ex-colonies in Africa.


All of this is laid out here, this link opens to a PDF file which is an image of one of Clinton’s emails.  If you click on the link, a thingy will come up on the bottom of your screen asking if you want to open the PDF.  I think it’s safe to open it; it comes up in another window.

This particular email is very telling.  It is dated April 2, 2011, and is written by a guy named “Sid” to Hillary Clinton.  Just reading the email, it is clear that we are in the presence of true sociopaths:  Clinton, this guy Sid, Sarkozy, Bernard Henri-Levy, all spiders from the same jar.

For: Hillary From: Sid Re: France’s client & Qaddafi’s gold

1. A high ranking official on the National Libyan Council states that factions have developed within it. In part this reflects the cultivation by France in particular of clients among the rebels. General Abdelfateh Younis is the leading figure closest to the French, who are believed to have made payments of an unknown amount to him. Younis has told others on the NLC that the French have promised they will provide military trainers and arms. So far the men and materiel have not made an appearance. Instead, a few “risk assessment analysts” wielding clipboards have come and gone. Jabril, Jalil and others are impatient. It is understood that France has clear economic interests at stake. Sarkozy’s occasional emissary, the intellectual self-promoter Bernard Henri-Levy, is considered by those in the NLC who have dealt with him as a semi-useful, semi-joke figure.

2. Rumors swept the NLC upper.  echelon this week that Qaddafi may be dead or maybe not.

3. Qaddafi has nearly bottomless financial resources to continue indefinitely, according to the latest report we have received:
On April 2, 2011 sources with access to advisors to Salt al-Islam Qaddafi stated in strictest confidence that while the freezing of Libya’s foreign bank accounts presents Muammar Qaddafi with serious challenges, his ability to equip and maintain his armed forces and intelligence services remains intact. According to sensitive information available to this these individuals, Qaddafi’s government holds 143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver. During late March, 2011 these stocks were moved to SABHA (south west in the direction of the Libyan border with Niger and Chad); taken from the vaults of the Libyan Central Bank in Tripoli.
This gold was accumulated prior to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar. This plan was designed to provide the Francophone African Countries with an alternative to the French.franc(CFA).
(Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued at more than $7 billion. French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was one of the factors that influenced President Nicolas Sarkozy’s decision to commit France to the attack on Libya. According to these individuals Sarkozy’s plans are driven by the following issues:

a. A desire to gain a greater share of Libya oil production,
b. Increase French influence in North Africa,
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05779612 Date: 12/31/2015
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05779612 Date: 12/31/2015
c. Improve his intemai political situation in France,
d. Provide the French military with an opportunity to reassert its position in the world,
e. Address the concern of his advisors over Qaddafi’s long term plans to supplant France as the dominant power in Francophone Africa)
On the afternoon of April 1, an individual with access to the National Libyan Council (NLC) stated in private that senior officials of the NLC believe that the rebel military forces are beginning to show signs of improved discipline and fighting spirit under some of the new military commanders, including Colonel Khalifha Haftar, the former commander of the antiQaddafi forces in the Libyan National Army (LNA). According to these sources, units defecting from Qaddafi’s force are also taking a greater role in the fighting on behalf of the rebels:

After Gaddafi’s murder: Al Qaeda flags fly proudly over Benghazi.

And interestingly enough, this letter is among those which Clinton did NOT classify; apparently she didn’t see anything particularly damning in it.

After all, what would the Libyans have done with all that gold anyhow?  Just built schools, hospitals, irrigation projects, and funded African development?  All laughably unimportant, compared to such goals as:

  1. Strengthening Sarkozy’s political position at home
  2. Putting Hillary Clinton into the White House; or
  3. Solidifying Bernard-Henri Lévy’s reputation as the “moral conscience” of our time.  (If “moral conscience” includes such notions as promoting colonial wars and genocide.)

Yes, But Where Is the Gold?

Bottom line:  Nobody knows where the missing gold is.

Where the f*** is the gold? Does Clinton know?

All we know for sure is that Gaddafi, the man whose leadership brought so much wealth to Libya, was brutally murdered by a mob of Western-paid, Western-armed jihadi rabble.

Who didn’t merely kill him, but also tortured and sodomized him first.  Not forgetting to videotape their actions, for the viewing pleasure of their masters, who likes them some snuff porn.

And that Hillary Clinton watched this video, was delighted by it, as one of the commenters to the VZGLIAD piece notes, “She acts like a child who was just given a piece of candy.”

Laughed out loud, and exclaimed:  “We came, we saw, HE DIED!”

And this is the woman who would become President of the United States of America.  Abe Lincoln is sobbing in his grave.

Parasites Among Us : The Biological Reality of the Jew

We shall go over the very Nature of Parasites in order to understand the Nature of the Jew and his Minions better. Most of you who have read my articles should have an understanding of the metaphysical truth – the basis behind the old age meaning of “as above, so below” – whatever is true on one metaphysical level can be applied unto the higher or lower one. Whatever is true about parasites in their lower organic form, is true for the higher organic form. The difficult task is to mentally educate oneself to truly understand this concept and to finally accept it as being true – one has to come to the realization that the Jew indeed is a Parasite in the Humanoid Organic form. This is his Natural purpose. Once this settles in, one can begin to understand why the Jews have invented all the various ideologies, religions, monetary systems, political systems, etc. – which serve their purpose and agenda of remaining a hidden parasite among any and all other host nations. The Parasite wishes to remain on the Host and wishes for the Host not to remove him.

We all naturally avoid getting bitten by ticks and we try real hard to protect ourselves from them. One doesn’t go around naked in areas where there are many of them during a particular part of the year – doing so would be suicide – especially with the level of toxicity ticks have nowadays; some theories go as far as to say that the Jews themselves have turned ticks into deadly parasites whose bites can cause serious body damage because White people love the forest and Nature. Alas, the point is that once you know about the danger of modern-day ticks, you won’t go naked into areas that are infested with them. Imagine now that ticks could speak, that they could mentally manipulate you, just as the Jews do. Remember, the Jews told us in their “holy book”, the Zohar, that they are going to conquer the world through their “mouth”, which means, in other words, through propaganda and mental manipulation.

You’d have ticks whispering to you through the forest to take off your clothes and stop being so xenophobic towards them. God created both you and the tick, didn’t he? So why should you be making differences between you and the tick? Why would you be so hateful as to even label this other creature as a tick – call it simply a fellow creation of God! We are all the same after all -why should you try to avoid getting bitten by a tick; why such a thing is simply hateful and racist towards ticks. Such comparisons might seem strange to a newcomer of the Jewish question, but they are dead-on-true for all the rest of us who are aware of the Jew. Such examples are in direct relation to our reality : Change the tick whisper to Jewish every-day-propaganda and you got the same behavior.

It is therefore crucial for us to learn the Natural basics of the Parasite in order to apply such knowledge metaphysically.

In biology/ecology, parasitism is a non-mutual relationship between species, where one species, the parasite, benefits at the expense of the other, the host. Traditionally parasite (in biological usage) referred primarily to organisms visible to the naked eye, or macroparasites (such as helminths). Parasites can be microparasites, which are typically smaller, such as protozoa, viruses, and bacteria. Examples of parasites include the plants mistletoe and cuscuta, and animals such as hookworms.

Already here you can see the idea behind the metaphysical reality : There are parasites on every level of existence – from the smallest microscopic virus and bacteria to the large organisms – and we identified the Jew as a Parasite in humanoid form. The Jew can also be identified as a Virus and is therefore destroying the Immune System of any and all Host nations he infests – allowing bacteria, yet another type of parasites – to enter the Host Organism a lot easier. These bacteria and viruses are living off of the organism for as long as the organism can survive while suffering through such disease and sickness. In our reality, we call this process the establishment of the Jewish Social Welfare state – a system where all the non-Whites in White Nations are given free everything and anything – all in the name of “equality, fraternity and brotherhood”, of course. In case of the Jews, one such major way of getting free stuff, is both their control of the Banks and Usury and the various “reparations” they receive for the invention of the Holohaox.

Do notice that once you truly understand that the Jews and their minions are nothing but Parasites among us – then you cannot ignore the fact that parasitism is a non-mutual relationship between species. White European People gain nothing from the existence of Parasites among them. We literally benefit nothing from them – it is only them, the parasites – who benefit at our expense. I wish to remind you at this point of yet another reference in the Jewish Zohar, where the Jews told us that they will destroy each and every other Nation like a worm destroys a ship – little by little will they eat through our system until we sink and drown, meeting our inevitable death without realizing what was going on until it was – too late.

It was therefore in the Jewish interest to destroy any and all types and forms of Natural sciences, faiths and traditions. Paganism had to be replaced by Jewish Christianity in order to make the Host people believe that the Parasite and the Host are “one and the same”, equal, fraternal brothers in “one Jewish God”. Just as the example of the tick I gave you, you were told to love your enemy and resist not evil.

Unlike predators, parasites typically do not kill their host, are generally much smaller than their host, and will often live in or on their host for an extended period. Both are special cases of consumer-resource interactions. Parasites show a high degree of specialization, and reproduce at a faster rate than their hosts. Classic examples of parasitism include interactions between vertebrate hosts and tapeworms, flukes, the Plasmodium species, and fleas.

Jews show a high degree of specialization – don’t they? It is in their interest to take over any and all forms of “specialization“, that is to say positions of power, which then allow them to freely parasite off of other individuals and other hosts. One such way of acquiring power was their invention of Capitalism and Usury – Usury being a “commandment of God” in the Old Testament – Capitalism being the foundation of the teachings of the Jewish Talmud. With both of these powers, the Jews took over the world around them – slowly, but surely. The reproduction rate is also a commandment from the Old Testament : Be fruitful and multiply – Subdue the Earth!

However, unlike other bacterial parasites which truly do reproduce in the billions – the Jewish parasite has figured out that it must keep its numbers down to a certain degree in order to remain hidden. As the parasite is feeding off of his host, the host starts to notice it. A tick bite will start to itch eventually. In our reality this means that the Jew will eventually be discovered by the Host nation and its People. Once this occurs the Jew must do whatever he can to remain hidden or to remove attention from him – he must not be removed like the tick – he must remain in his parasitic position by any means necessary.

Parasitoidy is an evolutionary strategy within parasitism in which the parasite generally kills its host. A parasitoid is an organism that spends a significant portion of its life history attached to or within a single host organism in a relationship where the host is ultimately killed. Thus, parasitoidy is a similar evolutionary strategy to typical parasitism, except for the more serious prognosis for the host.

Parasitoids feed on a living host which is eventually killed, typically before it can produce offspring. Many species of true parasites can cause the death of their host if they are present in overwhelming numbers, the host is in poor condition, or the host’s health is compromised by secondary infections. Parasitoids can be classified as either endo- or ectoparasitoids with idiobiont or koinobiont developmental strategies. Endoparasitoids live within their host’s body. Ectoparasitoids feed on the host from outside. Idiobiont parasitoids prevent further development of the host after initially immobilizing it. Koinobiont parasitoids allow the host to continue its development while feeding upon it. In another strategy, some parasitoids influence the host’s behaviour in ways that favour the propagation of the parasitoid, often at the cost of the host’s life.

Jews have been living among White Aryan host nations for thousands of years now – and the result of the Aryan nation after not dealing with the Jewish Parasite has always been – death. Where the Jew was not able to directly destroy his host nation, he used another host in order to overwhelm the first host. This is also noted in Nature as follows : A spectacular example is the lancet liver fluke that causes host ants to die clinging to grass stalks, where grazers or birds may be expected to eat them and complete the parasitoidal fluke’s life cycle in its definitive host. Thus, the Jew created Islam in order to turn the Middle Eastern people into lunatics who would conquer Europeans for the Jew. One shouldn’t be surprised therefore that the Muslim conquest of Spain was a Golden Era for the Jews.

The Jews know that a future of race-mixed people across the entire planet without any identity, group consciousness or awareness will be their heaven on Earth. No one will notice if the average Joe goes missing the next day – there won’t be a family unit in the society to take care of him, to worry about him, to check on him on a daily basis. There won’t be any parents who take care of their children. One must understand the following : The Parasite is almost always an Individual. And he has trouble penetrating a Group. But if everyone around him is also an Individual – then the Parasite, due to his Nature, becomes Superior in such an environment. This cannot and must not be overlooked. The Jews, collectively, as a whole, act Individually, but strike together as a Group.

You cannot deny the Metaphysical and Natural Truth at this point anymore.

Parasites reduce host biological fitness by general or specialized pathology, such as parasitic castration and impairment of secondary sex characteristics, to the modification of host behavior. Parasites increase their own fitness by exploiting hosts for resources necessary for their survival, such as food, water, heat, habitat, and transmission. Pathology, as such, can be both physical and psychological. I believe that all of us who are aware understand, at this point in time, that we are being physically destroyed by Parasites all over the place and that there is a 24/7 psychological war going on against us. You may be shocked by all that you are reading here, you may shiver from this realization – but you must have the courage to understand our World and our Existence from this metaphysical point of view. We are being destroyed by other humanoid parasites.

Parasitic castration is defined as : the strategy, by a parasite, of blocking reproduction by its host, completely or in part. A parasite that ends the reproductive life of its host theoretically liberates a significant fraction of the host’s resources, which can now be used to benefit the parasite. Lafferty points out that the fraction of intact host energy spent on reproduction includes not just gonads and gametes but also secondary sexual characteristics, mate-seeking behavior, competition, and care for offspring. Poulin suggests that prolonged host life may also result from parasitic castration, benefiting the parasite. Well, I’ll be damned, right? Need we remind ourselves of all the anti-White propaganda the Jews have been bombarding us with for the last 70 years? Of all the propaganda which tell us not to have children in order to “save the planet”, in order to “atone for our racist sins”, to race-mix ourselves out of existence, etc.? Should we remind ourselves of all the vaccinations and hormonal dysfunctions which the Jew has done to our people? The mental destruction of our Natural roles through feminism and transgenderism?

The impairment of secondary sex characteristics includes the process of creating effeminate men among our people and women who are not feminine anymore. While we are being destroyed and told by not only the Jews, but also all their puppets such as the other non-White races within our Host nations, to stop existing, to stop reproducing and to accept “diversity” as our future – all of these Parasites among us are exploiting us for resources necessary for their survival – many of you know by now that the average “immigrant” is receiving 3000 euros per month for free as social welfare in European Nations such as Germany – that they are given free housing, free food, free everything and, in case of England, even get more benefits for having more and more children. All propaganda against reproduction is targeted on White people.



Corrupt courts absolve criminal politicians but murder our truthtellers

Hillary wants the White House but should be in the Big House

By John Kaminski

I’m trying to catch up with events to write a roundup on all of Hillary Clinton’s crimes, but I can’t because each day a new atrocity occurs that necessitates rewriting the whole story. Today it was that she received $100 million from several corrupt Middle Eastern regimes, creating yet another reason why she is ineligible to run for president. <> Plus, there is the incredible story of the Clintons’ corrupt history in Arkansas that sets off permanent alarm bells in my mind. You may wallow in it here.

But let me return to the story as I was about to tell it, just the recent stuff that will shake your faith and make you wonder how someone with such an in-your face criminal history could actually be asking to be president of the United States.


You don’t have to be an expert in algebra to realize that the savage behavior of the U.S. government — not only to innocent bystanders all over the world, but also to its own people, the people it is charged to protect and nurture — is due directly to the deformed personalities of the people who have been elected as leaders of this once prosperous but now decaying republic.

Take as a supremely relevant example this image I can’t get out of my mind. It’s the one of 200 little bodies neatly arranged on the floor of a hall in Syria. They’re all dead. <>

The major newspapers all trumpeted the news that this atrocity was the handiwork of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad. The U.S. government promised a top priority investigation. But only those who have really followed the news for any length of time know that this is another lie vomited forth to justify the criminal actions of the war machine. And of course the top priority investigation never materialized. http://<>

It is only much later, years later, that we learn that the Syrian president didn’t do this, certainly not to his own people, to whom he is a benefactor, and not a mass murderer, especially of children. But the children are still dead, and we are left to determine who the killers of these innocent victims really were.

At this point, most Americans may turn away to vomit and see in the puddle the putrid reflection of their own guilt.

They say American presidents are a realistic composite of the typical American citizen.

So now we can come to no other conclusion that our own present president, assisted by the deranged woman who aspires to be our next president, are the true perpetrators of this ghastly deed, through the hired terror group known as ISIS they hired along with the Israelis and the other Middle Eastern monarchies that are all joined at the hip with the Jew killers who control most of the world.

We get no information about this from our mainstream, Jewish dominated media.

So we turn our attention to the usual suspects, the Americans doing the work of Israel, funding through its usual client states the hideous outfit known as ISIS, supposedly an Islamic terror group, but really an arm of the phony terror concoction known as Al-Qaida, wreaking havoc on behalf of the Jews and the U.S., who for many years have wanted to run an oil pipeline through Syria, and now have invented this new and continuing faux-Muzzie terror threat to cloak their sinister objective.

But the image that’s in my head of all these little dead bodies strewn across the floor, so neatly laid out in rows? Who is really responsible for this monstrous mess? None other than Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, our present president and very possibly our future president Hillary Clinton. <>

OK, there’s not much space in this story to cover all the corpses that can be attributed to these two, so we better get to it.

Hillary is cruising toward the Democratic presidential nomination and presumably will run against billionaire Donald Trump, who is chomping at the bit to further demolish her reputation with many of these same points.

The FBI is bending over backwards not to indict her for crimes involving the Clinton Foundation, evidence for which is contained in all the emails she destroyed on her private computer.

The charge that she improperly handled classified information and should do jail time for it is a convenient cover story to conceal something much darker, something which ties her directly to the government murder of rancher Lavoy Finicum, and implicates dozens if not hundreds of federal, state and local officials in a smorgasbord of crimes against innocent defendants guilty of nothing but defending their First Amendment rights while protesting the jailing of farmers whose land the government is trying to steal.

Hillary’s role in brokering the deal giving a company named Uranium One rights to the property owned by the Hammond family in Oregon led to the double jeopardy jailing of the Hammonds, the peaceful Bundy protest at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, and ultimately in the premeditated murder of Finicum, who it must be noted was precisely the kind of God-fearing, upstanding American citizen the government should be trying to keep alive. <>

Instead, it murdered him because he was such an articulate spokesman for the cause of independent landowners who are trying to resist the outlaw encroachments of the Bureau of Land Management, which steals people’s land and sells it to foreign entrepreneurs, making millions in commissions/bribes for corrupt politicians while the victim citizens go broke, are put in jail, and have to watch their families scramble to survive without being able to help them. <>

The smelly involvement of federal, state and local cops, corrupt judges and prosecutors and senators who stand to make millions by throwing these ranchers in jail in order to steal their property reminds me of the situation in Arkansas when Bill Clinton was governor and numerous officials were conscripted (or murdered if they didn’t comply) into hiding the details of the $100 million per day cocaine smuggling operation in Mena, Arkansas. Another prominent lie covered up the rapacious behavior of the governor himself ruining the lives of hundreds of women and girls at his coke-fueled sex parties.

This is, after all, the Clinton recipe for success. And how many rape charges has Bill Clinton fended off?

Today, at the same time Hillary skips free on charges that nearly put Gen. Petreaus in jail (mishandling of classified emails), dozens of real American patriots have been slammed in solitary confinement with promises of 100-year sentences for their participation in the 2014 standoff at the Bundy ranch in Nevada and the peaceful gathering in Bend, Oregon.

So now we have the real possibility of President Hillary Clinton, who laughed hysterically — with unbounded joy, even! — at the horrible rape and murder of Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi, and who shrugged with indifference at the needless deaths of the four abandoned heroes of Benghazi (Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods).

I’m sure Mrs. Clinton was glad to see Ambassador Stevens sodomized and butchered by a crowd of animals actually paid by the U.S., because he was probably the only man who could have testified the she herself was the one who instructed him to send nerve gas stolen from Libya via the “rat line” to Syria so the ISIS rebels could murder all those children and attempt to blame it on Assad. <>

And now in Nevada, Cliven Bundy is suing to get the judge off his case because she was appointed by Harry Reid, the corrupt Nevada senator who all along has been trying to steal Bundy’s land and sell it to the Chinese for $5 million. <>

In the sorry history of American injustice, none of this is really anything new. Further revelations are certain to emerge in the Bundy cases involving moles secreted among the groups of protesters and malfeasance among the authorities who conducted the ambush murder of Finicum and those who declared it legal.

Thievery and bribery will always be with us. An absolutely fair justice system has never existed. The only remedy for crime is for each of us to be scrupulous in our daily lives, and absolutely intolerant of officials who abuse our trust.

That we have failed to do that as a nation has resulted in our becoming the land of injustice, where rich criminals run free and no one is safe.

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.



“Written by “By Jonas E. Alexis

Great WarsIn his book Great Wars & Great Leaders,[1] scholar Ralph Raico points out,“Why is it self-evident that morality required a crusade against Hitler in 1939 and 1940, and not against Stalin? At that point, Hitler had slain his thousands, but Stalin had already slain his millions.

“In fact, up to June, 1941, the Soviets behaved far more murderously toward the Poles in their zone of occupation than the Nazis did in theirs.

“Around 1,500,000 Poles were deported to the Gulag, with about half of them dying within the first s. As Norman Davies writes: ‘Stalin was outpacing Hitler in his desire to reduce the Poles to the condition of a slave nation.’”[2]

This is a historically rational point. For we all know what Stalin was up to by 1932, when he liquidated more than five million peasants. No Western nation put pressure on him or told him to stop slaughtering those innocent people.

We can historically say that Stalin’s willing executioners were none other than the Dreadful Few.  We know for example that the complex social issues of the 1920s, such as the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, were largely viewed as Jewish revolutionary activities.[3]

During the Bolshevik Revolution millions upon millions of people were liquidated, including innocent peasants.[4] In addition, the Bolshevik ideology, with its Marxist/Communist and therefore diabolical leanings, began to spread like wildfire in Asian countries like China,[5] and wherever it went countries began slaughtering their own people by the millions.[6]

Leaders both in America and Europe knew that Bolshevism was creating political terrorism in Russia and would eventually try to conquer much of the world.

For example, the U.S. State Department published a three-volume report in 1931 stating that Jewish-owned German banks conspired to send large sums of money to Lenin, Trotsky, and other Bolshevik luminaries to overthrow the Tsar.[7]

Jewish financiers such as Jacob Schiff in the United States and Max and Paul Warburg in Germany poured millions of dollars into the Bolshevik movement. Schiff is said to have given $20 million dollars to the regime—a sum equivalent to billions of dollars today.[8]

By 1937, long before Hitler had significant political power, Stalin had already starved and executed as many as ten million peasants.[9] This period in history—from 1929-1937—is known as the Red Holocaust.[10]

By 1938, a total of 9.7 million perished, and from 1939 until 1953, another 9 million lost their lives.[11] From 1937-1939, Stalin executed 50,000 clergymen alone.[12]

Stalin’s terrorism began as early as 1918, when

“he ordered the execution of all suspected counter-revolutionaries. Stalin burned villages in the countryside to intimidate the peasants and discourage bandit raids on food supplies a decade before he became Red tsar.”[13]

Noted historian J. Otto Pohl writes that

“the Soviet Koreans were the first nationality the Stalin regime deported in its entirety on the basis of their ethnicity. It was an act of national repression on a grand scale.”[14]

Norman Naimark declares that

“a good argument can be made that Stalin intended to systematically wipe out the kulaks as a group of people—not just metaphorically as a class—and that therefore the result can be considered genocide.”[15]

Later he continued, “The principled abstention from using the term genocide can serve politicized purposes as much as its application to specific historical circumstances.”[16]

Even after World War II, Stalin did not stop terrorizing the peasants.[17] Minority groups such as the Greeks, Germans, Turks, Orthodox Christians, Lithuanians, and Vlasovites also fell prey to Stalin’s ethnic cleansing.[18]

For Lenin, the real enemy was the Church. He passionately declared in 1922,

“Now and only now, when there is cannibalism in the famine areas and hundreds, if not thousands, of corpses are lying on the roads, we can (and therefore must) carry out the confiscation of Church valuables with the most furious and merciless energy, not stopping at the crushing of any resistance…

“Therefore I come to the inevitable conclusion that it is now that we must give the most decisive and merciless battle to the obscurantist clergy and crush its resistance with such cruelty that they won’t forget it for several decades.”[19]

Historian Donald Rayfield of the University of London, who is not even a church sympathizer, noted,

“In the parishes some 2,700 priests and 5,000 monks and nuns perished. Across Russia there were 1,400 bloody confrontations between Cheka or Red Army and parishioners, and over 200 trials.

“On March 20, 1922, the Cheka ‘indicted’ Patriarch Tikhon for counterrevolutionary activity despite the latter’s eagerness to compromise; Trotsky wanted to arrest the entire Holy Synod.”[20]

Senior clerics were arrested in Moscow and some were shot and sentenced to death.[21]

There is no way that Hitler could square historically with Stalin’s Red Holocaust, even if we accept the historically perverse claim that six million Jews did die in Nazi Germany. As Rosefielde notes,

“Communism is indelibly stained by the Red Holocaust. Nonetheless, the will to deny, blur, soften, mitigate and pardon communist high crimes against humanity persists for complex personal, partisan, academic, cultural, political and pragmatic reasons.”[22]

According to Rosefielde, Stalin was involved in the ethnic cleansing of the peasants by violent means, including executions, terror, and starvation, beginning with an attempt in 1917.[23] As he puts it,

“The peasantry was the Bolsheviks’ first and primary target, because it did not fit Lenin’s Marxist paradigm, founded on the criminalization of private property, business and entreprenurship.”[24]

We see the same pattern in Communist China, where Mao “forcibly collectivized the peasantry.”[25] In the end, Communist China was responsible for the death of at least forty million.[26]

When all is said and done, The Black Book of Communism tells us that the Soviet regime and its communist ideals were responsible for the death of one hundred million people. Other historians would reduce that number to approximately 60 million.[27]

 In a nutshell, whenever Jewish revolutionary activity is consistently followed, there will always be bloody conflict, which may result in the death of millions.

maoWhen Mao for example followed communist and socialist philosophy, which inexorably flowed from the pens of people like Karl Marx and Moses Hess and Ferdinand Lassalle, historian Frank Dikotter tells us that “between 1958 and 1962, China descended into hell.”[28]

In 1949, Mao went to Russia in order to learn from the Soviet Union, and from 1955-1956, he started to implement Stalin’s collectivization.[29]

Like Stalin, Mao got rid of religion in society:

“Religion had no place in the people’s communes: churches, temples and mosques were turned into workshops, canteens and dormitories.

“In Zhengzhou, eighteen out of all twenty-seven places of worship for Catholics, Protestants, Buddhists and Muslims were taken over, and a further 680 rooms privately rented out by religious congregations were confiscated.

“The city was proud to announce by 1960 that the number of Christian and Muslim worshippers had shrunk from 5,500 to a mere 377. All eighteen religious leaders now participated in ‘productive labour’—except for three who had died.”[30]

In general, Mao created a living hell in China, his regime being responsible for the death of more than 40 million during four years alone: 1952-1962.  And this living hell was quickly picked up by neighboring countries such as Cambodia, whose leaders also followed the communist ideology.

Starvation in Mao’s communist kingdom was so rampant that a number of people began to eat human flesh.[31] In the summer of 1958, the famine was so horrible that

“some people eventually dug up, boiled and ate human bodies. Soon the practice appeared in every region decimated by starvation, even in a relatively prosperous province such as Guangdong.”[32]

There were also instances where “several children were eaten.”[33]

Other terrible acts of cannibalism were widespread in places such as Tongwei, Yumen, Wushan, Jingning, and Wudu, and the communist leaders knew that these acts were taking place.[34]

In one place, for example, “a seventy-year-old woman unearthed the bodies of two small children and cooked them for herself.”[35]

Other inhumane acts were widespread, such as tying a ten-year old and throwing him into a bog where he died after a few days.[36]

Other people were left in the cold, naked, where many of them died—and even pregnant women were no exception.[37]

In other instances, excrement and urine were used as a punishment to cover people. One individual was forced to swallow excrement, and died a few weeks later.[38]

Other punishment such as nailing people’s ears to the wall was also common.[39] Another extreme form of torture was burying people alive.[40] As a result, in order to escape torture, many ended up taking their own lives.[41] For instance,

“In Shantou a woman accused of theft tied her two children to her body before jumping into the river.”[42]

 Here again we see that Marxism, Communism, Stalinism, and now Zionism/Neo-Bolshevism/Neoconservatism are not just political or intellectual enterprises.



In general, those movements have detrimental ramifications if they are followed through consistently.

At their core, they are metaphysical rejections of the Logos, and by rejecting Logos as the measure of all things, those movements embrace to a large extent the opposite of reason as the ultimate metaphysical meaning to bring about heaven on earth, which always turns out to be hell on earth.

The book of Revelation has a specific term for this diabolical activity: the synagogue of Satan. Denis Fahey would have probably called this “the Mystical Body of Satan.”[43]

This diabolical system, to use Churchill’s own words, “has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century”[44] and will continue to shake the world with its political, social, and spiritual horror.

As we saw in the previous article, Churchill started out well by writing one of the most provocative articles in the twentieth century, “Zionism Vs. Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.”

Yet instead of thinking this through seriously and following his moral and practical reasoning, Churchill ended up falling under the guiding hands of Zionism, which quickly allowed him to see notorious mass murderers such as Stalin and even Tito as kindred spirits.[45]

At one point, “when an aide pointed out that Tito intended to transform Yugoslavia into a Communist dictatorship on the Soviet model,” Churchill, who was “profoundly impressed by Darwinism,” who took Darwin’s survival of the fittest very seriously, who “took a particular dislike, for some reason, to the Catholic Church, as well as Christian missions” and who gradually became, in his own words, “a materialist—to the tips of my fingers,”[46]declared: “‘Do you intend to live there?’”[47]

Here Churchill once again could not realize that he was making a case for Nazi Germany, which he hated with a passion.

Let us grant for a moment that Hitler wanted to turn Germany into a place where Jews would simply have no chance. Did Churchill intend to live in Germany? Why was he so concerned about reducing Germany into abject servitude? Why did he hate Hitler so much? Raico writes,

“The massacres carried out by Churchill’s protégé, Tito, must be added to this list: tens of thousands of Croats, not simply the Ustasha, but any ‘class-enemies,’ in classical Communist style.

“There was also the murder of some 20,000 Slovene anti-Communist fighters by Tito and his killing squads. When Tito’s Partisans rampaged in Trieste, which he was attempting to grab in 1945, additional thousands of Italian anti-Communists were massacred.[48]

Lenin Mao StalinHe continues to say,

“From the outset of hostilities, Churchill, as head of the Admiralty, was instrumental in establishing the hunger blockade of Germany.

“This was probably the most effective weapon employed on either side in the whole conflict. The only problem was that, according to everyone’s interpretation of international law except Britain’s, it was illegal…

“But, throughout his career, international law and the conventions by which men have tried to limit the horrors of war meant nothing to Churchill…About 750,000 German civilians succumbed to hunger and diseases caused by malnutrition..

“The effect on those who survived was perhaps just as frightful in its own way. A historian of the blockade concluded: ‘the victimized youth [of World War I] were to become the most radical adherents of National Socialism.’[49]

“Churchill even had a hand in the barrage of pro-British, anti-German propaganda that issued from Hollywood in the years before the United States entered the war.”[50]

Churchill made it clear that Hitler, not Stalin or Tito, was his primary target: “the defeat, ruin, and slaughter of Hitler, to the exclusion of all other purposes, loyalties and aims.”[51]

When Stalin and other Communist leaders were creating hell in Europe in the Bolshevik slaughter houses, perceptive observers began to get upset. Yet again Churchill’s response was astonishing:

“Why are we making a fuss about the Russian deportations in Rumania of Saxons [Germans] and others?…

“I cannot see the Russians are wrong in making 100 or 150 thousand of these people work their passage….

“I cannot myself consider that it is wrong of the Russians to take Rumanians of any origin they like to work in the Russian coal-fields.”[52]

In 1915, after provoking other nations to get into World War I, Churchill declared, “I know this war is smashing and shattering the lives of thousands every moment—and yet—I cannot help it—I love every second I live.”[53]

Churchill wanted to literally destroyed Germany because he perversely thought that Germany was the cause of evil in the world. He declared in 1943,

“The twin roots of all our evils, Nazi Germany and Prussian militarism, must be extirpated. Until this is achieved, there are no sacrifices we will not make and no lengths in violence to which we will not go.”[54]

bookYet he knew very well that he was propagating lies at the expense of truth. In his widely read book on the war, he declared,

“The human tragedy reaches its climax in the fact that after all the exertions and sacrifices of hundreds of millions of people and of the victories of the Righteous Casue, we have still not found Peace or Security, and that we lie in the grip of even worse perils than those we have surmounted.”[55]

Churchill, then, was implicitly following a diabolical plan, and this became very apparent when it was widely known that the destruction of Dresden created literal panic across Germany and much of Europe.

“At least 30,000 people were killed, perhaps tens of thousands more. The Zwinger Palace; Our Lady’s Church (die Frauenkirche); the Bruhl Terrace, overlooking the Elbe where, in Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons, Uncle Pavel went to spend his last years; the Semper Opera House, where Richard Wagner conducted the premieres of The Flying Dutchman and Tannhauser and Richard Strauss the premiere of Rosenkavalier; and practically everything else was incinerated…

“On March 16, in a period of twenty minutes, Wurzburg was razed to the ground. As late as the middle of April, Berlin and Potsdam were bombed yet again, killing another 5,000 civilians.”[56]

Churchill knew that he was one of the men who fomented all that. Yet how did he respond to the aftermath? Listen very carefully:

“I cannot recall anything about it [Dresden]. I thought the Americans did it.”[57]

By October of 1944, he told Stalin: “The problem was how to prevent Germany getting on her feet in the lifetime of our grandchildren.”[58]

Churchill, then, certainly did not really believe in what he wrote in “Zionism vs. Bolshevism”: “Reiterated warning from Adam von Trott and other resistance leaders of the impending ‘bolshevization’ of Europe made no impression at all on Churchill.”[59]

In short, one can say that Churchill was one of Stalin’s willing executioners, for “In place of help, all Churchill offered Germans looking for a way to end the war before the Red Army flooded into Central Europe was the slogan of unconditional surrender.”

But unconditional surrender also implied that the United States would be able to apply the Morgenthau Plan,

“which gave the Germans a terrifying picture of what ‘unconditional surrender would mean. This plan, initialed by Roosevelt and Churchill at Quebec, called for turning Germany into an agricultural and pastoral country; even the coal mines of the Ruhr were to be wrecked.”[60]

Raico writes,

“With the attack on the French fleet, Churchill confirmed his position as the prime subverter through two world wars of the system of rules of warfare that had evolved in the West over centuries.

“But the great war crime which will be forever linked to Churchill’s name is the terror-bombing of the cities of Germany that in the end cost the lives of around 600,000 civilians and left some 800,000 seriously injured.

“(Compare this to the roughly 70,000 British lives lost to German air attacks. In fact, there were nearly as many French killed by Allied air attacks as there were English killed by Germans.)”[61]

When all is said and done, it was pretty clear to perceptive observers and scholars that Churchill and Roosevelt intended to destroy Germany.

“No wonder that, learning of this, a civilized European like Joseph Schumpeter, at Harvard, was driven to telling ‘anyone who would listen’ that Churchill and Roosevelt were destroying more than Genghis Khan…

“Winston Churchill was a Man of Blood and a politico without principle, whose apotheosis serves to corrupt every standard of honesty and morality in politics and history.”[62]

Churchill, Stalin, and indeed Roosevelt did destroy Germany. As Thomas Goodrich rightly points out,

“What had taken the German nation over two millennia to build, had taken its enemies a mere six years to destroy.

“When the fighting finally ended on May 8, 1945, the Great German Reich which had been one of the most modern industrial giants in the world lay totally, thoroughly and almost hopelessly demolished.

“Germany, mused an American newsman drifting through the rubble, resembled nothing so much as it resembled ‘the face of the moon.’

“Omar Bradley agreed. After viewing for himself the blackened, smoking wreck, the US general reassured his countrymen, ‘I can tell you that Germany has been destroyed utterly and completely.’”[63]

Lastly, the Nuremberg Trials were simply a laughing stock. During those trials, most of Stalin’s judges and willing executioners were the actual prosecutors! Those people were “seasoned veterans of the purges of the ‘30s…”[64]

So here is the logic: Stalin’s hangmen liquidated more than 10 million people in less than three years, but those same hangmen and assassins would later preside over the Nuremberg Trials. It is indeed pathetic.

 If we are going to commemorate the dead—whether it is the people who died in Nazi Germany or under Communist regimes—let us commemorate them all, not just a select few.

Ernst Nolte

Ernst Nolte

It is irrational and immoral to have dozens of museums dedicated to people who died in Nazi Germany while there is not a single museum for people—including Christians—who died under Bolshevik or Communist regimes.

When German historian and philosopher Ernst Nolte raised a similar point some years ago, Israeli historian Yehuda Bauer charged that Nolte clearly wanted

“to free German society from bearing any particular responsibility for World War II, and the Holocaust in particular.”[65]

Yet a few paragraphs later, Bauer, to much astonishment, declared that he would want

“to universalize the Holocaust to the extent that people include in it the fate of the Gypsies, of Poles, Czechs, Russians, Ukranians, Serbs, and the German handicapped.”[66]

Isn’t that precisely the point that Nolte was making? Why couldn’t Bauer remain consistent?

Despite historical evidence to the contrary, Bauer still maintains that “the murder of the Jews” in Nazi Germany “was unique.”[67]

Bauer is not done. He risibly and sanctimoniously declares that German and Jewish written documents are not reliable and, for him,

“Documents were written to hide things, not to explicate them; not always, to be sure, but at several rather crucial points. We cannot rely solely, or even mainly, on German documentation as the oracle that will give us a true picture.”[68]

Documents, like any other legal papers, have to be examined in order to be considered reliable. But that is not what Bauer seems to be pushing. He is pushing for a more “reliable” source: “So the main source is oral testimonies.”[69]

Yehuda Bauer

Yehuda Bauer

We have seen how many oral testimonies, later written in book forms, have proved to be detrimental in Jewish studies, and it is far-fetched to say that they should be our main sources.

We know for example that oral testimonies—most specifically by Illya Ehrenberg—repeated for years that the Nazis made soap out of Jewish fat. Are we to believe this?

If oral testimonies were our main sources, then the soap story would still be popular propaganda even today.

We have shown numerous times that there was a “convergence of evidence” showing that people were gassed at Belsen, Dachau, and other places; there was a “convergence of evidence” showing that the Nazis used Jewish fat to make soap.

Alleged eyewitnesses were summoned, supposed documents were used, photographs were forged, and physical evidence was fabricated. Those claims were made by a wide range of Jewish organizations, including Simon Wiesenthal.

These stories, particularly the soap story, spread like wildfire in Poland, Slovakia, and even Germany. This was so popular that “by July 1942 rumours were rife all over Eastern Europe that Jews were killed in great numbers and ‘boiled into soap.’”[70]

Yet no serious historian would even put his credibility on the line saying that the Nazis did make soap out of Jewish fat.

The only people I know who seem to believe this nonsense are half-baked Michael Shermer and Alex Grobman. They declare that “Soap was never manufactured on an industrial scale from victims’ bodies, but it may have been done experimentally.”[71]

Shermer and Grobman never told us how they came to know that the soap story was false. And the sad and tragic part of all this is that people who first questioned the soap story and other “Shoah” fabrications long before Shermer and Grobman were and still are being persecuted for their alleged crimes!

Take for example Dr. Fredrick Toben. Because of his skeptical mind and because he questioned key aspects of the Holocaust story, Toben has been an object of ridicule and indeed humiliation all over Europe.

Last May, the Sydney Morning Herald quoted Senator Brandis as saying that Toben is a “nutter.”[72] And here is how Brandis continues to dismiss Toben:

“I’ve never read anything that Mr Toben has said but I’m aware of his views from press reports and views I’ve heard attributed to Mr Toben are absolute rubbish.”[73]

Fredrick Toben

Fredrick Toben

He’s got to be kidding. He’s calling Toben a “nutter” without even reading what he has actually has published? Who is the real nutter? Brandis has more bullets in his political pistol. Listen to this:

“I don’t agree with Mr Toben but I do agree with President Barack Obama who said last week in relation to the Donald Sterling case: ‘when people, when ignorant folks want to advertise their ignorance, you don’t have to do anything, you just let them talk.’”[74]

If he really wants people like Toben to talk, why has Toben in particular been literally denigrated and fined for his views? I contacted Toben and here’s what he told me:

“I was forced into bankruptcy of $230,000+ because legal aid would not cover such proceedings [the cases against him].”

He also warned me:

“Be wise, and if you can withstand the stress of being a dissenter without hurting your love ones, then the historical examples…should guide you through this legal minefield…

“There will be attempt to destroy your moral stance but remain firm because truth is your defense.”

I admire people like Toben because they see truth, not ideology, as their destination. Toben wrote:

“I am a Holocaust questioner because that is what my philosophical training was all about – to question the veracity of what Holocaust historians have constructed in their narrative.

“Throughout these past seventy years this narrative has constantly changed while being fixed in legal concrete, and I object to such mechanism that has often protected outright lies at the expense of truth emerging, which directly impacts on our free expression – the hallmark of our civilization.

“So, I question any aspect, any assertion made in those many Holocaust-Shoah narratives for truth-content, otherwise I would be offending against my philosophical training and would support the construction of an ideology.”

This is certainly rational and defensible position, which has some intellectual backbone. Moreover, Toben has said almost the same thing that many Jewish historians have publically uttered for years.

For example, Jewish historian Tim Cole unapologetically declared that “Shoah business is big business” in the twentieth century.[75]

Yet when Toben ends up saying the same thing, he is somehow a “Holocaust denier”! Listen to how Australian Senator Christine Milne vilifies Toben:

Why doesn’t Milne get a search warrant on Cole? Why doesn’t she declare that Cole was defaming the dead in his widely read bookSelling the Holocaust? Why doesn’t she say the same thing about Jewish historians like Raul Hilberg, who did not even believe in the six-million figure? Could it be that Milne is just a Zionist puppet?

Benedetto Croce

Benedetto Croce

Italian philosopher and historian Benedetto Croce (1866-1952) wrote in his celebrated work Theory and History of Historiography:

“History is never constructed from narratives, but always from documents, or from narratives that have been reduced to documents and treated as such…

“A history without relation to the document would be an unverifiable history; and since the reality of history lies in this verifiability, and the narrative in which it is given concrete form is historical narrative only in so far as it is a critical exposition of the document, a history of that sort, being without meaning and without truth, would be inexistent as history…

“Thus to talk of a history of which the documents are lacking would appear to be as extravagant as to talk of the existence of something as to which it is also affirmed that it is without one of the essential conditions of existence.”[76]

This is the historical method, and historians, whether they like it or not, must abide by that principle in order to do real history. And yet Yehuda Bauer writes,

“I would argue that when we have ten independently recorded, conversing and comparable testimonies, they are more reliable than a document about the same situation written by some German or Jewish source, or by a Polish bystander. And for most Jewish communities destroyed by the Nazis there is very little or no written documentation.”[77]

As we have already seen, Bauer’s point here is purely non sequitur for the very reason that a wicked ideology can be orally passed down from one generation to the next without serious examination. We have already seen how the soap story spread like a virus.

Bauer has already asserted that the German written documents cannot be trusted, so little will convince him if it happens to be shown that what he believes is simply an imaginary world.

The fact is that it can hardly be shown that “very little or no written documentation” is existed. The archives are full of documentation that historians like Bauer do not care to search because, well, archival documents do not matter for those people.

Finally, if very little or no written documentation survives, there is no need to make authoritative statements about the Holocaust, for Bauer himself would be arguing from a lack of evidence, which is not real history at all.

Since Bauer relies heavily on oral testimony, he too has been deceived. In the forward of Filip Muller’s book Eyewitness Auschwitz: Three Years in the Gas Chambers, he wrote,

“Muller is neither a psychologist nor a historian. Since he first published his memoir in the 1970s, we have learned a great deal about Auschwitz, so that we now know that there are inaccuracies in some of his statistics and diagrams as presented here.

“As far as these items are concerned, the reader should refer to historical accounts published in the more recent past.”[78]

Precisely. In fact, the Holocaust story is full of holes. To cite again Norman Finkelstein,

“Articulating the key Holocaust dogmas, much of the literature on Hitler’s Final Solution is worthless as scholarship. Indeed, the field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense, if not sheer fraud. Especially revealing is the cultural miliew that nurtures this Holocaust literature.”[79]

Where is Christine Milne when you need her?

[1] Thanks to a reader who recommended this book to me.

[2] Ralph Raico, Great Wars & Great Leaders (Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2010), 80.

[3] See Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004); Carr Hallett Edward, The Bolshevik Revolution (New York; Macmillan, 1950); Stephen Cohen, Bukharin and the Bolshevik Revolution (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980); Adam B Ulam, Bolsheviks (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980); Jerry Z. Muller, Capitalism and the Jews (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010). Many scholars do not declare that Jews were at the forefront of the revolution because this would imply that anti-Jewish reactions would have to be reassessed.

[4] See Robert Conquest, Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivism and the Terror-Famine (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008) and The Great Terror (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990); Miron Dolot, Execution by Hunger: The Hidden Holocaust (New York: W. W. Norton, 1987).

[5] See Steven Rosefielde, Red Holocaust (New York: Routledge, 2010).

[6] See Frank Dikotter, Mao’s Great Famine (New York: Walker, 2010).


[8] See Gary Allen, None Dare Call It Conspiracy (Cutchogue, NY: Buccaneer Books, 1976).

[9] Rosefielde, Red Holocaust, 40.

[10] Ibid., 50.

[11] Ibid., 20.

[12] Ibid., 44.

[13] Ibid., 42.

[14] J. Otto Pohl, Ethnic Cleansing in the USSR, 1937-1949 (Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press, 1999), 9.

[15] Norman Naimark, Stalin’s Genocide (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010), 63.

[16] Ibid., 124.

[17] Steven Rosefielde, The Red Holocaust (New York: Routledge, 2010), 46.

[18] Ibid., 79-80.

[19] Donald Rayfield, Stalin and His Hangmen: The Tyrant and Those Who Killed for Him (New York: Random House, 2005), 126.

[20] Ibid.

[21] Ibid, 126-127.

[22] Rosefielde, Red Holocaust, 7.

[23] Ibid., 35.

[24] Ibid., 35-36.

[25] Ibid., 103.

[26] See Dikotter, Mao’s Great Famine.

[27] See Rosefielde, Red Holocaust.

[28] Dikotter, Mao’s Great Famine, ix.

[29] Ibid., xvii.

[30] Ibid., 167.

[31] Ibid., 320.

[32] Ibid.

[33] Ibid.

[34] Ibid., 321-323.

[35] Ibid., 323.

[36] Ibid., 294.

[37] Ibid., 294-295.

[38] Ibid., 295.

[39] Ibid., 295-296.

[40] Ibid., 296.

[41] Ibid., 304-305.

[42] Ibid., 305.

[43] See Hugh Akins, Synagogue Rising (Orlando: Catholic Action Resource Center, 2012), vii.

[44] Churchill, “Zionism versus Bolshevism,” Illustrated Sunday Herald.

[45] Raico, Great Wars & Great Leaders, 84-85.

[46] Ibid., 59.

[47] Ibid., 85.

[48] Ibid., 95.

[49] Ibid., 65-66.

[50] Ibid., 76.

[51] Ibid., 81.

[52] Ibid., 95.

[53] Ibid., 101.

[54] Ibid.

[55] Ibid., 98.

[56] Ibid., 92.

[57] Ibid., 101.

[58] Ibid., 85.

[59] Ibid., 86.

[60] Ibid., 87.

[61] 89.

[62] Ibid., 91, 101.

[63] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 277.

[64] Raico, Great Wars & Great Leaders., 97.

[65] Bauer, “A Past That Will Not Go Away,” Berenbaum and Peck, The Holocaust and History (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998), 14-15

[66] Ibid., 16.

[67] Ibid., 16, 22.

[68] Ibid., 21.

[69] Ibid.

[70] Walter Laqueur, The Terrible Secret: Suppression of the Truth about Hitler’s “Final Solution” (New York: Henry Holt, 1998), 145.

[71] Michael Shermer and Alex Grobman, Denying History: Who Says the Holocaust Never Happened and Why Do They Say It?(Berkley: University of California Press, 2000), 117.

[72] Heath Aston, “Holocaust Denier Frederick Toben Backs George Brandis’ Plans for Discrimination Law,” Sydney Morning Herald, May 13, 2014.

[73] Ibid.

[74] Ibid.

[75] Tim Cole, Selling the Holocaust: From Auschwitz to Schindler, How History is Bought, Packaged and Sold(New York: Routledge, 2000), 1

[76] Croce, Theory and History of Historiography, introduction.

[77] Bauer, “A Past That Will Not Go Away,” Berenbaum and Peck, The Holocaust and History, 21.

[78] Filip Muller, Eyewitness Auschwitz: Three Years in the Gas Chambers (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1999),  ix-x.

[79] Norman Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering (New York: Verso, 2000), 55




“Our race (speaking of the Jews) is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves.”– Menachem Begin. (Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in a speech to the Knesset [Israeli Parlament], quoted by Amnon Kapeliouk, “Begin and the Beasts,” New Statesman, June 25, 1982)



“Only the Jews are humans, the Non-Jews are not humans, but cattle” (goyim = human cattle) [1]
– Kerithuth 6b page 78, Jebhammoth 61a

“The Non-Jews have been created to serve the Jews as slaves” [2]
– Midrasch Talpioth 225

“The Non-Jews have to be avoided, even more than sick pigs”
– Orach Chaiim 57, 6a

“Sexual intercourse with Non-Jews is like sexual intercourse with animals”
– Kethuboth 3b

“The birth-rate of the Non-Jews has to be suppressed massively” [3]
Zohar II, 4b

“As you replace lost cows and donkeys, so you shall replace dead Non-Jews” [4]
– Iore Dea 337,1

“To box an Israeli on the ear, is like to box on the ear of God”
Sanhedrin 58b

“God (Jahveh) is never angry about the Jews, just about the Non-Jews”
Talmud IV / 8 / 4a

“The human (the Jew) has to pray every day three times, because Jahveh didn’t make him a goyim, not a female and not an ignorant”
– Talmud V / 2 / 43b + 44a

“Towards a Non-Jew the Jew doesn’t cause an adultery… Punishable for the Jew is just the adultery towards his next, that means the wife of a Jew. The wife of the Non-Jew is excluded”
– Talmud IV / 4 / 52b

“There is no wife for the goyim, they really aren’t their wives”
– Talmud IV / 4 / 81 + 82ab

“You (the Jews) have made me, Jahveh, the only true lord in the world, so I will make you the only ruler in the world”
“Who wants to be smart shall occupy himself with money matters, because there are no corner pillars in the Thora that are more important, because they are like a sparkling fountain”
– Talmud IV / 3 / 173b

“Jews always have to try to deceive Non-Jews” [5]
– Zohar I, 168a

“Non-Jewish property belongs to the Jew who uses it first”
– Babba Bathra 54b

“If two Jews have deceived a Non-Jew, they have to split the profit”
– Choschen Ham 183,7

“Every Jew is allowed to use lies and perjury to bring a Non-Jew to ruin”
– Babba Kama 113a

“The possessions of the goyim are like an ownerless desert, and everybody (every Jew) who seizes it, has acquired it”
– Talmud IV / 3 / 54b

“The Jew is allowed to exploit the mistake of a Non-Jew and to deceive him”
– Talmud IV / 1 / 113b

“The Jew is allowed to practice usury on the Non-Jew” [6]
– Talmud IV / 2 / 70b

“When the Messiah comes, all will be slaves of the Jews”
– Erubin 43b

“Whoever disobeys a Rabbi deserves death… Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.”
Erubin 21b

“If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there”
– Moed Kattan 17a

“Non-Jews are Not Human. Only Jews are human (“Only ye are designated men”)
– Baba Mezia 114a-114b

“Jews are Divine. If a heathen (Gentile) hits a Jew, the Gentile must be killed. Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God”
– Sanhedrin 58b

O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews. A Jew need not pay a Gentile (“Cuthean”) the wages owed him for work
– Sanhedrin 57a

“If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite…the payment is to be in full.”
– Baba Kamma 37b

Jews May Steal from Non-Jews – Baba Mezia 24a

If a Jew finds an object lost by a Gentile (“heathen”) it does not have to be returned
– (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b)

God will not spare a Jew who “marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean…”
– Sanhedrin 76a

Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews. When a Jew murders a Gentile (“Cuthean”), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a Gentile he may keep
– Sanhedrin 57a

Gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has “exposed their money to Israel.”
– Baba Kamma 37b

Jews May Lie to Non-Jews. Jews may use lies (“subterfuges”) to circumvent a Gentile
– Baba Kamma 113a

Non-Jewish Children Sub-Human. All Gentile children are animals
Yebamoth 98a

Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth
Abodah Zarah 36b

Gentiles prefer sex with cows
– Abodah Zarah 22a-22b

A Jew may marry a three year old girl (specifically, three years “and a day” old).

SANHEDRIN, 55b: “A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea).” (emphasis in original text of Soncino Edition, Ed.)

– Sanhedrin 55b


Sanhedrin 54b

A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old.
– Sanhedrin 54b

“When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.”
– Kethuboth 11b

“Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal.”
– Sanhedrin 59a

“Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed.”
– Abodah Zara 26b

“To communicate anything with a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.”
– Libbre David 37

“Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is of three years of age.”
– Yebhamoth 11b

“Jesus is in hell and is being punished by being boiled in semen. Christians are boiled in dung”
Gittin 57a

“If it be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of this earth.”
– Choschen Ham 388, 15

“A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely if by so doing Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people.”
– Choschen Ham 266, 1


An Overview of the Early Subversion of America

John Friend’s Blog
July 25, 2013

Shortly after the Constitutional Convention, when it was up to the states to ratify or reject the newly proposed United States Constitution, the Anti-Federalists were already warning the American people that, once approved and established, a consolidated federal government’s “relentless expansion of arbitrary power was unstoppable, its tendency toward corruption was inevitable, and its appetite for despotism was unquenchable,” according to Joseph J. Ellis in his book American Creation: Triumphs and Tragedies at the Founding of the Republic (pg. 116). Looking back in hindsight, the Anti-Federalists had it exactly right, at least in the case of the United States.

Anti-Federalists, including Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, and others skeptical of a centralized federal government were also raising alarm bells at the prospect of a centralized Bank of the United States shortly after the Constitution was approved and ratified by the states. Alexander Hamilton and the elite banking and financial establishment in America, working on behalf of and in collusion with international financial interests centered around the Jewish banking families in London and other major European capitals, “represented a tiny minority within the overall populace” who “had somehow managed to engineer a hostile takeover of the fledgling American republic and were now poised to consolidate their control to the detriment of all the ordinary citizens, mostly farmers, the true lifeblood of the nation,” writes Ellis (pg. 170).

President Andrew Jackson, amongst others, would later warn the American people of the dangers that monopolistic, speculative financial interests posed to the young United States in the early 1800s. In his 1832 veto of the legislation that would have rechartered the Bank of the United States, President Jackson wrote:

The rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes… Many of our rich men have not been content with equal protection and equal benefits, but have besought to make themselves richer by act of Congress.

President Jackson declared to his cabinet “The Bank of the United States is itself a Government,” and warned the American people private corporations sought “power to control the Government and change its character.” He also courageously told his Vice President Martin Van Buren, “The bank is trying to kill me, but I will kill it!” And indeed, President Jackson did just that. However, the international money power seeking to subvert the United States was not defeated.

Time and time again, righteous men in American history raised the alarm bells and sought to prevent the subversion and destruction of the nation their ancestors founded. However, the insatiable desire for political and financial control over these United States was unstoppable, and the forces of international speculative financial capitalism came to dominate this country over the course of the 19th century. The destruction of American economic (and political) sovereignty was finally complete with the establishment of the Federal Reserve System in 1913, which centralized the banking and financial apparatus of this nation into the hands of a clique of international plutocrats hell bent on world domination and subjugation. The centralization of a nation’s banking system is a key component of international communism, whose primary goal is the overthrow of Western civilization and all it stands for.

The very concept of a corporation has been transformed and perverted over time. In early American history, states granted private corporations a monopoly on fulfilling a particular public service for a specific period of time. If a road needed to be expanded, for example, and the state was lacking in funds to complete the project, a private corporation would write a charter explaining its purpose (expanding, managing, and maintaining the road expansion) and the state would grant the corporation the privledge of providing an essential public service. Corporations helped build canals, bridges, roads, and other major infrastructure projects, including the extensive railroad system which provided transportation and communication advancements to the American people and private businesses.

But even in this regard, corruption set in, monopolies formed, and the people became oppressed by large financial interests dominating and influencing the state and federal government. Expressing a popular grievance in early America, the editor of New York’s Evening Post William Leggett, wrote:

We cannot pass the bounds of the city without paying tribute to monopoly. Not a road can be opened, not a bridge can be built, not a canal can be dug, but a charter for exclusive privileges must be granted for the purpose… The bargaining and trucking away charted corporation privileges is the whole business of our lawmakers.

The rise of speculative financial capital and large corporations, especially railroad corporations, ushered in an era of unprecedented greed, speculation, corruption, and insider dealings in early American history. Alexis de Tocqueville, the French philosopher and writer who wrote extensively about the unique political and cultural traditions of America, perhaps best expressed the plight of the struggling American frontiersman and farmer. Writing in Democracy in America, Volume Two, de Tocqueville contrasted the “territorial aristocracy” or the traditional elite in European society and the “manufacturing aristocracy” or the financial elite which had arisen in America:

The territorial aristocracy of former ages was either bound by law, or thought itself bound by usage, to come to the relief of its serving-men and to relieve their distresses. But the manufacturing aristocracy of our day first impoverishes and debases the men who serve it and then abandons them to be supported by the charity of the public.

Congressman Hendrick B. Wright of Pennsylvania, a champion of the working class and of the American pioneer, advanced legislation in the late 1870s to help homesteaders – small independent American farmers and ranchers – secure and develop their land without going into massive debt. Congressman Wright’s efforts were defeated by plutocratic financial interests and their minions, who denied the small independent pioneer and farmer – the very men and women who made this country – any sort of financial concessions while they themselves were lavishly awarded government contracts and land grants. Congressman Wright, who once said, “The working men of this land are better entitled to the bounty of Government than aggregated wealth,” responded to the rejection of his legislation with this poignant remark:

Congress can grant railroads money and land, but if it talks of relieving the poor and oppressed, the cry comes, ‘We cannot reward idleness.’

I wonder what Congressman Wright would have said about the criminal bailout of Wall Street in late 2008? Congress can grant Wall Street speculators bailouts as a result of their criminal financial practices, but if it talks of relieving home-owners and oppressed debt-slaves, the cry comes, “We cannot reward idleness.”  Has anything really changed in American politics in the past 150 years?

Indeed, government largess and corrupt dealings created corporate bonanzas, especially for railroad corporations, which was the standard operating procedure in America for much of 19th century and even to this day. Railroad, lumber, cattle, and mining interests were essentially handed large land grants and other special privileges and insider-deals by the federal government, while independent American farmers and homesteaders were largely exploited and forced to fend for themselves. After being elected to his first presidential term in 1884, President Grover Cleveland appointed William Andrew Jackson Sparks as land commissioner. Mr. Sparks’ first report to Congress summarized the situation Americans knew all too well:

The widespread belief of the people in this country that the Land Department has been very largely conducted to the advantage of speculation and monopoly, rather than in the public interest I have found supported by developments in every branch of the service.

As former Governor of Pennsylvania Gifford Pinchot explained, “It must be remembered that monopolistic control was infinitely more potent in the West, in those days, than in the East. The big fellow had control of the little fellow to an infinitely greater extent west of the Father of Waters than east of it.” Speculators, monopolists, and plutocrats were taking over America, and those that stood in their way did not stand a chance.

Henry Adams and Charles Francis Adams, Jr. prophetically wrote in the late 1800s:

The belief is common in America that the day is at hand when corporations far greater than the Erie – swaying power such as has never in the world’s history been trusted in the hands of mere private citizens, controlled by single men like Vanderbilt, or by cominations of men like Fisk and Gould… after having created a system of quite but irresistible corruption – will ultimately succeed in directing government itself.

Congressman James B. Weaver, the populist presidential candidate for first the Greenback Party in 1880, then the People’s Party in 1892, described the ails of the American political system which still plague us today when he wrote in 1892, “Public sentiment is not observed. The wealthy and powerful gain a ready hearing, but the plodding, suffering, unorganized complaining multitude are spurned and derided.”

The 19th century truly was a pivotal period of time in American history.  It was during this century that the government formed by the Founding Fathers morphed from an instrument which served the American people to one which served private economic interests to the detriment of the average American worker, farmer, craftsman, and independent businessman.

Writing in Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler succinctly explained exactly where America went wrong during the 19th century:

… as economic interests begin to predominate over the racial and cultural instincts in a people or a State, these economic interests unloose the causes that lead to the subjugation and oppression [of those people or State].

Perhaps unknowingly, Adolf Hitler perfectly described the United States of America during the 19th century – and it’s only gotten worse.