July 23, 2024



Organized Jewry: Destroyers Of The Western Civilization

“You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them.”
– Marcus Eli Ravage, Jewish author, quote from January 1928 issue of Century Magazine

“We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will for ever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build.”
– Maurice Samuels, Jewish author, quote from You Gentiles. For centuries, organized Jewry has been at the forefront in the efforts to subvert, corrupt, and eventually destroy traditional Western civilization and all that it stands for. Henry Makow, in a review of E. Michael Jones’ The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History, described the role played by organized Jewry to accomplish this goal as “subversive in the profoundest sense, overturning the Will of God, “Logos,” Christ’s Gospel of Love, the inherent Design and Purpose of Creation, hijacking mankind and arresting its development according to Cabalistic and Talmudic dictates.”

Through their control of the media and Hollywood, their influence in popular culture and the arts, various intellectual and “social justice” movements including cultural Marxism, feminism, and radical homosexuality, the promotion of pornography and sexual degeneracy, and advocacy of mass immigration and “multiculturalism” in Western European and European-derived countries (the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), organized Jewry has certainly targeted tradition Western civilization for destruction. These destabilization techniques represent a Jewish plot to culturally, spiritually, politically, and economically corrupt, pollute, and destroy European culture primarily, and all decent, honorable indigenous cultures generally. Organized international Jewry must be viewed as a hostile elite determined to destroy Western civilization. In the Preface of Culture of Critique, Dr. Kevin MacDonald breaks this down quite well: CofC describes how Jewish intellectuals initiated and advanced a number of important intellectual and political movements during the 20th century. I argue that these movements are attempts to alter Western societies in a manner that would neutralize or end anti-Semitism and enhance the prospects for Jewish group continuity either in an overt or in a semi-cryptic manner. Several of these Jewish movements (e.g., the shift in immigration policy favoring non-European peoples) have attempted to weaken the power of their perceived competitors — the European peoples who early in the 20th century had assumed a dominant position not only in their traditional homelands in Europe, but also in the United States, Canada, and Australia. At a theoretical level, these movements are viewed as the outcome of conflicts of interest between Jews and non-Jews in the construction of culture and in various public policy issues. Ultimately, these movements are viewed as the expression of a group evolutionary strategy by Jews in their competition for social, political and cultural dominance with non-Jews. Since the 1960s a hostile, adversary elite has emerged to dominate intellectual and political debate. It is an elite that almost instinctively loathes the traditional institutions of European-American culture: its religion, its customs, its manners, and its sexual attitudes.
MacDonald argues that Western civilization has essentially become Judaized, as the revolutionary Jewish intellectual and cultural leaders, including Theodore Adorno, Siegfried Freud, and others, and their ideas have been “avidly embraced by the vast majority of non-Jewish intellectuals” which demonstrates how “the Western intellectual world has become Judaized — that Jewish attitudes and interests, Jewish likes and dislikes, now constitute the culture of the West, internalized by Jews and non-Jews alike.” Dr. MacDonald continues:

The Judaization of the West is nowhere more obvious than in the veneration of the Holocaust as the central moral icon of the entire civilization. These developments constitute a profound transformation from the tradition of critical and scientific individualism that had formed the Western tradition since the Enlightenment. More importantly, because of the deep-seated Jewish hostility toward traditional Western culture, the Judaization of the West means that the peoples who created the culture and traditions of the West have been made to feel deeply ashamed of their own history — surely the prelude to their demise as a culture and as a people.
This cultural, spiritual, and intellectual attack by organized Jewish interests against traditional Western European culture must be recognized in order to avoid the complete destruction of the European peoples. A couple weeks ago, John Kaminski and I discussed some of the destabilization techniques organized Jewry has used in their battle against European culture and European peoples, which include:
•Promotion of homosexuality, “alternative lifestyles”, and the LGBT movement
•The women’s “liberation” movement, promotion of abortion, and attack on the family unit
•Promotion of pornography, licentiousness, and degeneracy
•Mass immigration, both legal and illegal, into European nations and European-derived nations
•Promotion of “equality”, “diversity”, and “multiculturalism” while attacking national and racial identities, in particular European identities (note: this concept does not apply to Jews, who are encouraged to identify as Jews and concern themselves with Jewish interests)
•Use of media, Hollywood, and other forms of propaganda to incite war against the enemies of international Jewry (NSDAP Germany—>”Communism”—> Muslims), manufacture racial divisions (Trayvon Martin!), and promote cultural and sexual degeneracy
•Promotion of mindless “entertainment”, distractions, games, and useless consumer goods, whose demand and worthiness is manufactured by the Jewish media
It’s a fairly well known, albeit unspoken, fact that Jews control the Western media and Hollywood. The Times of Israel published a blog post earlier this summer titled, “Jews DO Control the Media,” and Jewish writer Joel Stein openly bragged in the Los Angeles Times that Jews control Hollywood and other aspects of American culture, government, and finance. Neal Gabler, yet another Jewish writer, wrote An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood documenting the Jewish role in Hollywood.

The Jewish Daily Forward published an article a few weeks ago written by Douglas Wolk titled, “Faster Than a Speeding Tallis: Exploring Jewish Roots of Superman and American Comics,” detailing the Jewish influence on the comic industry. Wolk describes the American comic industry as an expression of Jewish culture, and writes that there “really were a lot of Jews involved in creating the most important American comic books, superhero and otherwise, from the late 1930s to the mid-‘70s.” He continues:

Without Jewish creators, there would have been no Superman, no Batman, no Archie, no Mad, no “Maus,” no “A Contract With God” and none of the major Marvel Comics characters introduced in the ’60s. Stan Lee, Jerry Siegel, Joe Shuster, Eisner, Harvey Kurtzman, Jack Kirby, Bob Kane, Bill Finger: all major names in the history of American comics, and Jews, one and all. And, with a few exceptions, they never made a particularly big deal about it in public venues.
Just the other day, The Jewish Daily Forward ran an article titled, “Movie Monsters’ Jewish Parentage” authored by Michael Kaminer outlining the Jewish role in creating the various monster movies in Hollywood over the years. A brief excerpt:

They don’t look related. But iconic movie monsters like the Mummy, The Wolf Man, Dracula, and Frankenstein’s creature share parentage. Carl Laemmle, a Hungarian-Jewish immigrant, founded what became Universal Studios in 1912; under the aegis of his son, Carl Jr., the studio went on to introduce the most memorable monsters in moviedom. Another Jewish refugee, Curt Siodmak, wrote screenplays for Universal creature features including “The Wolf Man,” “I Walked With a Zombie,” and “The Beast With Five Fingers.” […]
American culture is essentially a Jewish culture, especially American popular culture that has developed over the past 70 years or so since the invention of the television. Does it really surprise anyone anymore that all you see on television and in movies is pornographic, debasing, disgusting filth and Orwellian propaganda demonizing Jewry’s historic and current enemies while uncritically praising Israel and everything wrong about American culture? (See also “Secret Goals of Communism Near Fruition,” by Henry Makow)

The radical homosexual and LGBT movement has been championed and spearheaded by Jews for decades now, as this list attests. Here is a brief sampling of some of the Jews behind this depraved movement, which seeks to totally overthrow the traditional concept of marriage, family relationships, and parenting:
•Larry Kramer — co-founder of “Act Up,” a homosexual/AIDS activist organization; co-founder of the Gay Men’s Health Crisis.
•Alan Klein — co-founder of group ACT UP, co-founder of group Queer Nation, National Communications Director and chief spokesperson for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD]. Klein also co-founded the successful multimedia campaign STOPDRLAURA.COM
•Arnie Kantrowitz — co-founder of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
•Jonathan D. Katz — founded and chairs the Harvey Milk Institute, the largest queer studies institute in the world. A long time queer political activist, was a co-founder of Queer Nation, [the key San Francisco branch].
•Israel Fishman — founder of the Gay Liberation Caucus in 1970 [now known as the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered Round Table of the American Library Association], the world’s first gay professional organization.
•Bella Abzug and Edward Koch — both Jewish — the first members of the U.S. House of Representatives to introduce legislation banning discrimination based on sexual orientation [1974].
•Ronald Gold — reporter for Variety; a leader in the fight to overturn the American Psychiatric Association’s policy that homosexuality is an illness.
•Magnus Hirschfeld [d. 1935], early gay rights activist in Germany; founded one of the first gay rights organizations, the Scientific Humanitarian Committee; coined the term “transvestism”; fled Nazi Germany.
•Barney Frank — member of U.S. Congress; helped create non-discriminatory employment policies in all U.S. federal agencies.
•Kerry Lobel — executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
•Allan Ginsburg – late Jewish poet and leading member of North American Man Boy Love Association.
Jewish magazine Tablet ran a lengthy biographical hagiography of the depraved Jew that initiated the campaign for gay marriage in an article titled, “Gay Marriage’s Jewish Pioneer: The activist called Faygele ben Miriam started Washington state’s battle over marriage more than 40 years ago”:

Decades before any state had seriously considered legalizing gay marriage, long before anyone had thought of creating—never mind repealing—a policy called “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,” before Reagan, before AIDS, before the American Psychiatric Association determined that homosexuality was not a mental illness, and before half the people currently living in America were even born, a man named John Singer stepped into the King County marriage license office in Seattle.

The year was 1971.
With him was another man, Paul Barwick, whom he’d met recently at a meeting of the Seattle chapter of the Gay Liberation Front. Barwick was just back from Vietnam, 24 years old, still coming out of the closet. Singer was a little older, 26, very out and very political. He’d served as an Army medic in Germany because of his conscientious-objector status. In the spot reserved for religion, his military dog tag read: “Ethical Culture.” Earlier, at college in New York, he’d been the only member of his ROTC unit who was also in the SDS—Students for a Democratic Society.

These two men, Singer and Barwick, had become fast friends, occasional lovers, and, in a sense, business partners. “The business was gay liberation,” Barwick, now 65 and living in San Francisco, explained recently.

In front of a bunch of local media that had been tipped off in advance, Singer and Barwick marched up to the desk of the county auditor, a man named Lloyd Hara, and told him they wanted a marriage license. Hara refused.

So began one of the first—and least famous—gay marriage lawsuits in the nation, Singer v. Hara. It concluded unsuccessfully, in 1974, with the Washington State Court of Appeals essentially laughing the men out of court. But by that time Singer was on to his next fight, and a new name, Faygele ben Miriam, which he took to simultaneously tweak homophobes (“Faygele” is Yiddish for “little bird” or “faggot”) and honor his mother, Miriam Singer. This uniquely insistent man, who died 12 years ago this week, was in his time a huge force in Washington state’s gay politics, and at the leading edge—really, beyond the leading edge—of what would eventually become the national push to achieve same-sex marriage rights. “He matters because he was part of that first wave of couples challenging the unjust and unfair denial of the freedom to marry,” said Evan Wolfson, founder of the advocacy group Freedom to Marry and author of Why Marriage Matters. “And he spoke for millions, at a time when, in some respects, gay people were just beginning to speak for full inclusion and the right to be let in, not just left alone.”
In a separate article in Tablet titled, “Don’t Ask, Don’t Ask: Artists, particularly in theater, are still plagued by the slur ‘Gay Commie Jew.’ But how did it come about?,” art critic Allen Ellenzweig further documents the Jewish infiltration and subversion of American culture. This cultural attack was right out of the playbook of the cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School, who have pushed homosexuality, perversion, and degeneracy into the mainstream of American society. Ellenzweig writes:

After World War II, it seemed as if American culture high and low had been taken over by the Jews: Danny Kaye in the movies, George Burns and Milton Berle on television, Norman Mailer and Saul Bellow in literature, Arthur Miller in theater, Jerome Robbins in ballet and on Broadway, Leonard Bernstein on Broadway and in the concert hall. In the context of the Cold War, the American product—jazz, symphonic music, drama, modern dance, and ballet—became the currency of cultural exchange in proving the superiority of the Free World. We were the champions. As historian Michael Sherry writes, “Out of national pride, aspirations for cultural empire, and fears of enemy advances, Americans showcased artists as emblems of the nation’s freedom and muscular culture.”

But another group seeding the soil of American art was ripe for more direct scapegoating: homosexuals. Unlike Jews, no public decorum need be extended to them, a “group” that had neither the communal institutions Jews had built up over decades nor official solidarity based on tradition and a shared history of Diaspora. So, what was to be thought of the growing crop of “effete” Cold Warriors in the arts, who were to be ambassadors of the new American “muscular culture”? Figures like Aaron Copland, Leonard Bernstein, Jerome Robbins, Arthur Laurents, and Lincoln Kirstein provide a window into a period when Jewish homosexuals developed mixed communal and professional networks to reach cultural prominence despite social limitations as Jews, discrimination as gays, and career jeopardy as men on the political left.

While all five of these men were Jewish, Robbins and Laurents—Rabinowitz and Levine—carried names that might blur that distinction, and Kirstein claimed that his German-Jewish family was “remote from real piety.” All descended from Ashkenazim and, excepting Kirstein, were first-generation Americans, many with at least a smattering of Yiddish coloring the family patter. Within cosmopolitan circles, all were discreetly known as transgressing the heterosexual norms of the postwar period. Of the five, only Bernstein and Kirstein married, and Bernstein alone had children. All had to navigate their sexual lives in an America vastly different from the one we now inhabit.
The systematic promotion of pornography, sexual deviance and degeneracy, and licentiousness was and remains a major cultural destabilization technique used by international Jewry to pervert and corrupt the sense of morality in society, destroying healthy social norms and cultural values, replacing them with homosexuality, promiscuity, and debauchery. Dr. Lasha Darkmoon describes the origins of this movement and the leading role played by a group of perverted, disgusting Jewish “intellectuals” in a brilliant article titled, “Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance,” published in The Occidental Observer:

It comes as a big shock to learn that two of the fathers of the Sexual Revolution were both sexual perverts with an evangelical mission in life: to infect society with their wacky ideas and turn the world into a vast masturbatorium.

I refer to the 2oth century’s premier sex researcher Alfred Kinsey (1894-1956) and his notorious contemporary, cult psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich (1897-1957).

According to Freud and his followers, anti-Semitism was a universal pathology which had its roots in sexual repression. Its cure lay in “sexual liberation”. The theory, in its crudest and simplest form, amounted to this: instead of picking on the Jews, why not just chill out and have sex?

The underlying assumption here is that sex is the great liberator and that all political and economic frustrations can be alleviated by sexual activity—particularly by obsessive and addictive sex. People who spend all their waking hours in search of sexual stimulation are obviously unfit to organize pogroms, mount bloody revolutions, or become a threat to the rich and powerful.

This, in a nutshell, was the philosophy of Wilhelm Reich, high priest of the “masturbation industry”, to borrow a phrase from E. Michael Jones’s magisterial work Libido Dominandi, where Kinsey and Reich are both discussed in great detail.

Sex, according to the philosophers of the Sexual Revolution inspired by Reich, is to be the panacea for all society’s problems: the new opium of the people. If people cannot have bread, let them eat cake. If they cannot have jobs, security, fulfillment, and a valid purpose in life, let them have sex as a substitute. If nothing else, recreational sex will provide a useful distraction and give people something to do.

This is the man who went on to become, like his equally perverted contemporary Alfred Kinsey, one of the godfathers of the Sexual Revolution of the 1960’s.

From the likes of Kinsey and Reich, the easily duped Americans were to receive instructions on how to conduct themselves sexually.

As part of the neo-Freudian school of psychoanlysts, Reich received the enthusiastic support of a number of psychiatrists and writers, many of them part of the Jewish psychoanalytic sub-culture that was so important to erecting a powerful critique of Western culture, reaching its peak influence in the post-WWII era: Herbert Marcuse, Erich Fromm, Adorno, Horkheimer, Alexander Lowen, Stanley Keleman, Moshe Feldenkreis, Ida Rolf, Paul Goodman, Norman Mailer, Allen Ginsberg, Saul Bellow, Fritz Perls and Arthur Janov (see here and here).
Henry Makow, in an article titled “Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution,” expands on the Jewish role in the promotion of sexual deviance and degeneracy:

“The Kinsey Report” (1948) shaped current mainstream attitudes to sex. It championed unfettered sexual expression and became the manifesto of the counterculture and sexual revolution.

Essentially it said that deviant and unhealthy sexual behavior was so common as to be normal.

Thanks to psychologist Dr. Judith Reisman, we now know that Alfred Kinsey and the “Kinsley Report” were frauds. Kinsey, a Rockefeller funded zoologist at the University of Indiana, pretended to be a Conservative family man. In fact, he was a child molester and homosexual pervert who seduced his male students and forced his wife and associates to perform in homemade pornographic films.

Kinsey’s agenda, in Reisman’s words, was “to supplant what he saw as a narrow procreational Judeo Christian era with a promiscuous “anything goes” bi/gay pedophile paradise.” Crafting Gay Children:

More than 25% of his sample were prostitutes and prison inmates including many sex offenders. Kinsey, who died prematurely of disease associated with excessive masturbation, said 10 per cent of American men were gay when, in fact, only two per cent were.

Kinsey and his team of pedophiles abused 2,000 infants and children to prove that they have legitimate sexual needs.

Reisman concludes: “America’s growing libidinous pathologies…taught in schools…and reflected in our fine and popular arts, the press, law and public policylargely mirror the documented sexual psychopathologies of the Kinsey team itself.” (Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences)

In 1973, the Rockefellers bullied the American Psychological Association into proclaiming homosexuality normal. Together with feminists (who believe heterosexuality is inherently oppressive) gays began to dismantle all heterosexual institutions: masculinity, femininity, marriage, the family, the boy scouts, sports, the military, and the education system.

Using their control of the media, Rockefellers (i.e. Illuminati bankers) largely dictate our cultural sensibility. They are responsible for the obsession with pornography that pervades television, music videos and the Internet.

This state of arrested human development is characteristic of homosexuals who cannot form long-term relationships with the opposite sex. With straight women acting like men and vice-versa, with TV and schools promoting it, we are being turned into homosexuals.

Gay and feminist activists think traditional morality was invented to perpetuate an unjust status quo. In fact, morality is the accumulated wisdom of mankind regarding what is healthy and ultimately fulfilling. Perversion is deviation from what is healthy.

Heterosexual morality places sex in the context of love and/or marriage because it “humanizes” the sexual appetite. It ensures that the most profound and intimate physical act between two people expresses a commensurate emotional-spiritual bond. This is the only way sex can be truly satisfying for both men and women. It is also healthy for society because it provides for the natural and necessary outcome of sexual love, children.

In conclusion, the “sexual revolution” was really a triumph of perverse homosexual norms and values. The gay-feminist agenda is to redefine healthy as deviant and vice-versa and they have succeeded. The radical feminist movement, which spearheaded the push for the legalization and normalization of abortion, “women’s liberation”, the destruction of the traditional role of the woman in society, and the destruction of the family unit, was led by Jews like Betty Friedan, Bella Abzug, and Gloria Steinem. A revealing article published in The Jewish Daily Forward titled, “Why Are There So Many Jewish Feminists?” offers us a unique insight into the Jewish-led radical feminist movement:

Why have so many leaders in the feminist movement been Jewish? Why do so many women today believe in the tenets of feminism, yet resist calling themselves feminists? And what can we do to raise kids who believe in equal rights and equal responsibilities?

As Naomi Wolf points out in the Fall 2005 issue of Heeb, feminism and Judaism go together like Courtney Love and hitting people with microphones while screaming in a drug-addled spittle-flecked nipple-revealing manner. (Okay, she didn’t put it quite like that.) Ms. Wolf did say, “We have a political history going back to the socialist and labor movements, where women were organizers and rabble-rousers,” which is close. Even earlier, back in the 17th century, Glückel of Hamelin was a mother of 14 who ran a factory and expanded her husband’s business internationally after his death. In the 19th century and beyond, the wives of talmudic scholars ran businesses to support their families while their husbands studied. The notion of an indolent Jewish princess lounging on pillows in her Jewess Jeans while eating bonbons and contemplating her upcoming rhinoplasty is a relatively new one. We’ve always been working women.
The Jewish role in shaping Western immigration policy, which has resulted in the systematic flooding of non-European peoples into Europe and European-derived countries including the United States, Canada, and Australia, is a major technique of Jewish destabilization. Dr. Kevin MacDonald has written extensively on this topic. What follows is the abstract of Dr. MacDonald’s 1998 paper “Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical

This paper discusses Jewish involvement in shaping United States immigration policy. In addition to a periodic interest in fostering the immigration of co-religionists as a result of anti-Semitic movements, Jews have an interest in opposing the establishment of ethnically and culturally homogeneous societies in which they reside as minorities. Jews have been at the forefront in supporting movements aimed at altering the ethnic status quo in the United States in favor of immigration of non-European peoples. These activities have involved leadership in Congress, organizing and funding anti-restrictionist groups composed of Jews and gentiles, and originating intellectual movements opposed to evolutionary and biological perspectives in the social sciences.
This mass immigration, multicultural agenda has been promoted by organized Jewish groups for decades now. But what is their goal? Earl Raab, former head of the Institute of Jewish Advocacy, explained what this agenda’s end goal eventually is:

The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non‑white or non‑ European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi‑Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible — and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.Jews like Barbara Lerner Spectre openly call for the destruction of European society by promoting “multiculturalism” and mass immigration:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ&feature=player_embedded ]

Adolf Hitler, writing in Mein Kampf, described the subversive and destructive nature of organized Jewry’s influence on Western civilization:

The Jews have not the ability which is necessary for the founding of a civilization, for in them there is not, and never has been, that spirit of idealism which is an absolutely necessary element in the higher development of mankind. Therefore, the Jewish intellect will never be constructive, but always destructive. (Chapter XI, pg. 209)
Traditional Western civilization has essentially been destroyed by organized Jewry. Jewry must be viewed as a hostile, dangerous, and very well organized minority, constantly conniving and scheming to defraud and deceive their Gentile hosts. They cannot survive without us. Let’s all recognize the destructive force of international Jewry, and agree to outlaw these criminals from any position of influence in society or government forever.Organized Jewry: destroyers of Western civilization

Posted by John Friend.

Source: http://www.truthcontrol.com/forum/organized-jewry-destroyers-western-civilization