December 1, 2020

It's Communism not Homeland Security


Natural vs Judaized Civilizations – Religion & Economy in Antiquity

Part I: Primeval Civilizations

New scholarship has realized that Proto-Germanic words for money and gold are of Semitic origin. This means that our pagan ancestors were already at those early times visited by Semitic traders who presented them with money and a strange economic system which awakened a new kind of unknown greed.

This might come as a disappointment to those who see in the ancient pagan societies a sort of lost purity that we have to recover.

The good news is that such a primeval society did exist; we have to trace it back earlier than the Proto-Germanic language.

Even before their migrations our ancestors had been already visited by Semitic traders.

Comparative mythologists like the great Georges Dumezil realized that Norse mythology often preserved Indo-Germanic mythology more faithfully than other cultures (more than Greece, Rome, India or the Celts) and I believe this is because the Germanic peoples were the direct successors of Indo-Germanic civilization, and in comparison with Vedic India, Persia, Rome or Greece, they neither mixed, nor did they travel far away from their homeland.

I use the term Indo-Germanic civilization because I’m convinced that such advanced philosophy as we can reconstruct from their myths could have been possible only among a highly civilized race.

The Early Indo-Germanics had knowledge about the laws of thermodynamics. They even solved the philosophical question of nature vs nurture, and they brought with them incredible inventions like the process of cheese-making, the wheel, domestication of horses, unknown weaving techniques, etc.

The Scandinavians preserved Indo-Germanic Mythology more faithfully than others.

No one has been able to identify the remains of their civilization but what archeologist did find in the Danube Valley is as amazing, and it could bring some light to the riddle.

Part II: The Danube Valley

Few people know that the first great civilization on earth appeared neither in Mesopotamia nor Egypt. Official scholarship has discovered a much more advanced and more ancient one in Europe, baptized by the renowned archeologist Maria Gimbutas as The Danube Valley Civilization. Its discovery has led to the suspicion that their technology influenced the later rise of Mesopotamia and Egypt.

It has not been possible to link this civilization with the Indo-Europeans, in part because the language of this civilization has not been deciphered, but could it be that the Danube Valley civilization is the homeland of the Indo-Germanics?

Scholars haven’t identified with certainty the Indo-Germanic homeland, although they have a good knowledge about their world-view and culture. On the other hand, we have many material remains of the Danube-Valley civilization, but little knowledge about their culture. It seems to me that these two breaches fill each other.

The Danube Valley Civilization is the oldest high-tech civilization of the world.

Someone might retort here that the Indo-Germanics were nomad rangers without cities but this could be only the impression they left during their migrations, once they had to abandon their homeland and their civilization.

Could it be that the Indo-Germanic civilization was destroyed by Jewish economics, forcing them to migrate, just as the later Germanics tribes also had to migrate, forced by Roman imperialism?

There are still many mysteries to solve, but even if we consider the Indo-Germanic and the Danube Valley civilizations as separate, we can still say that we have here two primeval White civilizations before infection through Jewish influences.

For brevity I will give here only a summarized overview of these two:

  • The swastika was used by the Danube Valley Civilization as writing character.
6,000 years old Swastika from the Danube Valley Civilization.
  • The swastika was used later as decorative motive by the wandering Indo-Germanics, leading us to the question: Was it a memory of the script they lost during their flight from their civilization?.
  • The script of the Danube Civilization is the oldest one on earth having being documented as early as 6,000 BCE, almost 3,000 years older than the ones in Sumer and Egypt.
  • The cities in the Danube Valley Civilization show a lack of privileged classes. All members worked and enjoyed their prosperity all the same.
  • We know the Indo-Germanics had an economic system of private property combined with common property, which allowed the integration of all social classes.
  • From all ancient peoples of Indo-Germanic heritage it was the North-Germanics who preserved a lack of heritable nobility, before their contact with Christianity. Presumably because they were the most direct heirs of Indo-Germanic values. Heritable kinship was introduced later by the church.
  • The Danube Civilization was the first one to use multistory buildings, a revolutionary invention in those times, one which, by the way, black people never stumbled upon even during modern history.
  • Both the later Germanic peoples and the Danube Valley Civilization had sacred temples, which were not meant to display power but rather as modest centers for gathering.
  • Usury was unknown to both the Indo-Germanics as to the Danube Valley civilization.
  • The Danube valley civilization consisted of independent cities that voluntarily traded with each other, bound only through blood and culture and not through a centralized power.
  • The same principle of independent cooperation of small cities is to be found in all the early settlements of the Indo-Germanic peoples.
  • Such a system is only possible through direct democracy, a concept common to both civilizations and natural to many ‘primitive’ peoples before their contact with Jewish ideologies. Not to be confused with modern representative democracy, where the people has absolutely no control and the societies are too big to allow it.
  • In pagan Scandinavia all public institutions were controlled privately, by voluntary members of the race, using the principle of crowd-funding. We see here that privatization is actually good when you are not using usurious money, because there is no possibility to use the public good for selfish means. It is only while using Jewish money when privatization becomes nefarious.
  • It is very probable that the Danube Valley Civilization had a socio economical configuration similar to the early Scandinavians.
  • For the production of ceramic the Danube Valley Civilization had ovens that reached over 1000 Celsius and they invented for the first time in history the potter’s wheel (much earlier than Sumer or Egypt).
  • This potter’s wheel was probably inspired by the invention of the wagon, adjudicated today to the Indo-Germanics.
  • The Danube Valley Civilization knew how to melt metals as early as ca. 6,000 BCE., thus at least 1,000 years earlier than any other civilization in the world.
  • The Danube Valley Civilization knew weights and measures.
Part III: Time for Ourselves

In reality, all races of the world, regardless of their intelligence, can look back in the past toward a lost civilization, based on sharing and real democracy, in which they were independent and prosperous, in which all members were able to cover their material needs by working no more than 4 hours a day, in which all had access to land, where society allowed all to fulfill their social and spiritual needs, something which is only possible in racially homogeneous societies.

This civilization took different forms among different races, according to their tastes and talents. White people invented many more things, but in the end all civilizations were prosperous in their own way. Some were prosperous with high-tech, others with little inventions, but they were nevertheless free and independent, and that’s the greatest wealth in this world.

Even modern natives in Sumatra complain in the following way because of losing their forest: ‘we were rich, nature provided us everything we needed, food, medicine, wisdom’.

German activists reporting about the destruction of forests in Sumatra and the expulsion of Natives.

Now they have become slaves of the market and they have to sell their workforce in exchange for starvation-salaries.

When we realize that most workers around the world today spend 90% of their salary only to pay the rent and food, while having little free time for themselves, then we would not exaggerate by saying that a wild native who can get from the forest everything he needs, who works only 4 hours every day, only seasonally… He is indeed richer than many people in America or Europe. Especially because the native can decide when he works, how and where.

Salary-enslavement in our Jewish economy.

A salaried-slave works at all seasons, at fixed hours, under observation and threat, whereas the native adapts himself to the rhythm of Nature. If he is tired, if it is too cold outside or rainy, he stays at home and Nature is grateful for that because working more than seasonally is destructive to Her cycles.

By the way, I’m not pleading for returning to a hunter-gatherer lifestyle and rejecting technology altogether. I want to point out simply that every race has its own concept of wealth and prosperity, but in all cases it is only in contact with Nature and away from Jewish money.

We can use all the technology we want as long as we forget about growth, and leave half the planet to wild Nature. We would develop technology that helps us heal Nature instead of destroying her.

It should also be clear here that Nature is generous and she doesn’t expect us to work too much in order to live well. Getting more time for ourselves produces better things.

A good example of this is shown by many body-builders. Most of them fail in their projects because they do too much training. We all are born in Jewish ideologies, which convince us we are lazy and somehow defective, and that we should look for perfection in order to get the smallest reward.

Nature doesn’t expect from us that we work too much.

Nature tells us, on the contrary, that doing too much, that too much rational thinking, too much work, too much discipline brings less results than a balanced, joyful approach. A lot of mechanical work will never beat inspired work in the right measure.

Someone might retort here that most people are lazy and would do nothing if they had the choice, but that applies only to our Judaized world. When we can only work for alien projects, when our culture rotates only around consuming, then it is natural that people get apathetic, but as soon as we are free to follow our passion and start creative projects that benefit our people, everyone will start enjoy working, even extra hours.

Part IV: The Great Division

We can go so far as to divide history in two kinds of periods: Primeval and Post-Jewish. And we can divide human civilizations between Natural and Judaized.

Natural civilizations are the ones which arise instinctively among people of the same race and which reflect the beauty of Nature. Judaized civilizations are the ones molded after endless expansion, the concentration of riches and the destruction of Nature and all Her diversity.

This division will serve as a response to those Anarchists and Marxists who claim human civilization including farming are unnatural, and that any kind of technology, any use of metals, are a source of evil and enslavement.

The source of most evil and enslavement is rather an economic system that forces us to misuse our talents, putting every technology in the service of destruction.

Around 8,000 there already existed Natural civilizations around the globe, with high technology, like the Danube Valley in Europe. This civilization brought more inventions to the world than the later Judaized Roman Empire, disproving the idea that technology is a characteristic of Judaized civilizations and irreconcilable with healthy lifestyles.

Contrary to many Marxist  theories of history, the Danube Valley Civilization knew the working of metals without using them for senseless wars and it knew agriculture without producing a division between owners and dispossessed.

But around 5,000 years ago we see the first symptoms of sickness, of contact with a demonic kind of economy that started selecting for greed among the elites.

We know from later examples that Greek philosophy experienced a radical change towards a rationalistic, linear, intolerant, dualistic worldview, as soon as it adopted the use of coins, imported from Lydia, who had been using them since 700 BCE.

The Lydians on their stead must have adopted it from Semitic traders because the oldest coins known on earth were invented in the Semitic kingdom of Sumer. They were called Shekels, the Jewish word for  money till this day.

Lydian coins.

Now, the Roman Empire was since the beginning a follower of the Greek one, including the use of interest-money and this explains why the Romans wrote down their Indo-Germanic mythology as history and not as religion.

We see there the abandoning of Indo-Germanic values and the adoption of rational gods.

 Part V: War in Heaven

In order to understand what kind of gods replaced the Indo-Germanic ones, I want to introduce you to a mythological theme known among scholars.

Who has not heard of the myth about the jealous god Cronos who devours his own children in a desperate attempt to assert his tyranny at all costs? Most of you may know that the name of this deity means actually ‘time’ in ancient Greek, and is the etymological source of English words like chronology or chronical.

Modern depiction of Cronos.

The scholar C. Scott Littleton calls this mythological theme the ‘kinship in Heaven’ because it recounts a succession war in heaven, in which each generation of gods tries to dethrone its respective father, just as Zeus killed Cronos in order to acquire the reign over mount Olympus.

A similar story is to be found in ancient Babylonia about the god Marduk who kills some kind of dragon, but the important thing to keep in mind is that this myth seems to announce the replacement of the old, nature-bond gods with new rationalistic, office-carrying gods.

Nonetheless I would not be the first to compare the terrible god Cronos with the Jewish god of the Old Testament. This comparison gets further recognition through the fact that Mr. Littleton traced the origin of this myth to an Oriental, non-Indo-European source.  It seems most likely that this myth arrived to Indo-European societies, like ancient Greece, Assyria and Persia, through Semitic traders.


The old gods are depicted in those myths as tyrannical and the new ones as saviors but that is a misleading reversion of roles.

 Zeus is an Indo-Germanic name related to Latin Deus und Germanic Tiwas but the role he fulfills in the Greek pantheon (as found in Hesiod’s Theogony), namely that of grounding a new, universalistic order of time is alien.

This new role of Zeus fits better with Cronos (Yahweh), while the fate of Cronos (as defeated Nature-deity) fits better with the old Zeus.

In fewer words, here is what really happened: The tyrannical Cronos stole the throne together with Zeus identity, while Zeus was defeated and got the name and history of Cronos. Is that surprising? Does not the Jew slander White people today the same way as he should describe himself?

Now, such religious reforms in which the Indo-Germanic gods are defamed and demonized have taken place in almost all Indo-Germanic societies, long before Christianity, including Zoroaster’s reforms in Persia and something of the sort happened in ancient Greece.

The word demon itself is of Indo-Germanic origin and it means actually ‘god’. We have to thank Zoroaster for giving it a negative connotation.


We know also how these reforms occurred. We mentioned that Greek philosophy experienced a reformation as soon as the Greeks adopted the usage of coins, thus, we can thus deduce that something similar happened in Persia and India.

This adopting of Jewish money explains also the sudden appearance of the Vikings as slave traders around the 9th Century CE.

Scholars have estimated that farmers in antiquity had to work much less than we do today in order to cover all their needs, and under such circumstances slavery makes no sense. Only when usurious money forces you to produce much more than you require, do you need slaves.

Adding to that, an enormous controversy was unleashed when legal historians discovered that in their most archaic laws the Germanics knew no slavery, and that it was the contact with the Romans what made them adopt it.

This subject pisses off to this day most of Judaized legal historians, who would rather prefer to depict our ancestors as gloomy as possible.

But I would go a step further and say that it was contact with a hook-nosed race what forced both the Romans and the Germanics to adopt slavery as a currency and as way of production.

Reinforcing that argument is the fact that the Vikings were not alone; parallel with the Vikings we see Arabs and Magyars doing exactly the same things: trading with slaves and doing pirate-expeditions in order to acquire them.

Slaves trading was big business in antiquity.

The Jews had since immemorial times worked on creating an international slave-network, which would serve as basis to their usurious economy. They smuggled slaves for the first time and proclaimed them as international currency.

With the fall of the (Judeo)Roman Empire the void was filled by all folks with enough technology to carry out the task.

This slave trade was veiled through the spreading of universalistic religions, which claimed to ‘free’ humans from a determined land and a determined society.

In reality, it is the official definition of slavery, that someone has been removed from his network of relationships, relationships which are, of course, part of a determined culture and place.


The difference between a Viking ho goes into raiding trips and a young middle-class American who applies for a job in a company is in principle not so great.

Both have to work for a destructive market in order to get access to resources, which have been sequestered by this Jewish economy. What for us is to get money, was to the Vikings to get slaves or gold. Neither the Vikings nor us would do that out of free will.

Centuries later we see that the main purpose of the conversion to Christianity was to win tax-payers in the form of tithes. The Christian church was thus the seed of a traitor state, that farms people in the service of international market.

Part VI: Monocultures

Regarding Christianity someone might ask himself: How can a myth about a crucified Jew help in the creation of a usurious market? Well, the answer is not so complex once we understand the historical context.

If Natural civilizations arose through racial bonds and were held through thankfulness and generosity, Judaized states, on the other hand, have their origins on paid warriors. The ancient Jews seduced all kinds of criminals with their newly invented economic system, promising them to become rich at the expense of all their folkmates. All they had to do was to force the Jewish economic system using brutal force.

Among all races, the Jew always found corrupt elements, ready to betray their own folk, and serve Jewish plans.

The first attempts failed because most people were used to freedom and would not give in so easily, but the Jew never gave up and slowly began to corrupt more and more people.

Out of these corrupted warriors, elites appeared, and the modern state grew out of them. The only goal of this new kind of state is to maintain this economic system and to warrant the sick lifestyle of the superrich.


This Judaized state molds men and Nature to the capricious needs of the market. For example, virgin forests, with all their diversity and magic, are made into desolate monocultures, intended to maximize profits and to produce more efficiently.

We would not exaggerate if we say that the main end of this economy is to convert natural resources into mountains of garbage, and human workforce into digital numbers, as fast as possible. The accumulation of riches and the development of technology are only side effects of that ‘noble‘ aim. So great is the hate of the Jewish god toward Nature.

Now, let’s examine what happens when we extrapolate this practice to the human soul. If we compare our soul to a virgin forest: magical, full of diversity, healthy, alive, etc., we could say that Christianity’s duty was to transform it into a monoculture.

What they do with the fields, Jesus does with our souls.

The Christian ideology is like a kit of pesticides, fertilizers etc. that shape our soul for the purposes of the market. These spiritual pesticides in the form of guilt are intended to keep at bay all emotions and thoughts, which could threaten the monoculture.

The fertilizers in the form of blind faith are intended to make grow unnatural feelings of satisfaction despite living in a sick world.

Once our soul has become an artificial plantation, where all exotic species and all magical beings have been brought to extinction, it is just a matter of time that we begin to translate that spiritual desolation into social institutions.

As an example of these social institutions I like to consider language academies. These prescribe the correct use of languages and were grounded for the first time during the Absolutism.

Their goal was to build a centralized bureaucracy, needed for controlling citizens and extracting taxes more efficiently from them, taxes which poured out in the hands of international investors.

The result was catastrophic: The greatest diversity of dialects and expressions started to die out with the enforcement of those academies.

Thus, the claim that our market dislikes diversity of languages is not far-fetched and this aversion is already displayed in the bible. In the story about the tower of babel, the existence of many languages (and human races) is depicted as a punishment from god, implying that the desired and ‘natural’ state is to have a single language (and race?) for all people.

And now that we are dealing with languages I want to remind ourselves that Latin is the Judaized language par excellence. It is a strange mixture of words from many racial origins including Greek, Etruscan, Arabic and other unidentified alien elements.

That’s why the introduction of Latin words in other languages has the effect of destroying their diversity and beauty. In order to illustrate this let’s use an example from modern German:

Before the introduction of the Latin word Literatur the German language knew at least 5 different terms and concepts (of Germanic origin) like: Schrifftum, Schriftnachweis, Schriftwissenschaft, Gelehrsamkeit, Sprachwissenschaft.

But because the Latin word, in its vagueness, can be used for all, it destroyed with a single strike a small ecosystem of concepts, replacing them with a literary monoculture.

Today those Germanic words have become almost obsolete and very few German speakers can realize the subtle distinctions in meaning that the Germanic words used to express.

Perhaps it is the goal of the Jew, that in the future we can write using only a few dozen Latin words, which are so vague that they encompass all the former diversity. Almost like baby-talking

Part VI: Time Conceptions

We mentioned before the myth of Cronos, but now let’s bind it with the theme of Christianity.

Before the conversion our Germanic ancestors had a cyclical conception of time. They also considered the past as a spring containing all that has happened and it is probable that they believed the past can be somehow influenced by the present.

With the arrival of Christianity a new order of time arrived, a tyrannical one that goes linearly from a beginning (creation) to a prescribed end (apocalypse). It is a pretty gloomy conception because it implies that we have no influence, neither on the future nor on the past, that we are prisoners in a cruel game that leads unavoidably to the destruction of our planet, of our mother Nature.

This conception of time which ‘devours its own children’ strongly resembles the attitude of Cronos. Therefore it should come as no surprise that the Germanics believed (as attested in the Edda) that evil entered in this word with the arrival of the Norns presiding over time. Could that be an allusion to the arrival of the Jewish god?

Cronos devouring his children by Damien Hirst.

This perception of time as a prison resembles also our economic system, because what is money-speculation if not playing with time?

Usury is actually a fine for the time waited before repayment, and investing in the stock market is nothing more than waiting for the right moment to put or to remove your assets.

This speculation with money, the extortion of interests, getting rich without working etc., …these things are possible only under a linear conception of time, a very artificial construction that is destroying life in our planet.

before their adoption of Jewish money all peoples on earth made economic transactions without caring about the exact moment of compensation. It is something called trust and it survives today only in homogeneous societies like Scandinavia (with exception of modern Sweden) and only in a limited form.

Afterword: A cruel game

Forests in which natives live are healthier and better preserved than the ones which have been abandoned by humans. This is the case because our mission on this planet was to guard Nature. We developed such intelligence and power in order to protect our planet from possible external dangers, but then came the Jew, inspired by demonic beings and started to pervert our natural instincts making us destroy the very treasure we were supposed to protect.

When we ask ourselves: What is more profitable, to destroy a forest transforming it into a paper fabric or to preserve it letting all kinds of endangered animals to multiply there?, the answer depends on the timescale we use.

Using a Jewish conception of time, that predicts the coming end and sees time as a one-way arrow, then it is more profitable to destroy life, but when we use a longsighted and cyclical conception of time, the preservation of Nature is without doubt the only intelligent decision.

I don’t know if you have ever seen those Judaized films called Saw, in which the protagonists have been kidnapped and wake up trapped in a cruel game. At the beginning they are all victims but soon they realize that they have to become victimizers if they want to survive.

Scene from the Judaized film ‘Saw’.

Only the one who is ready to torture and bloodily kill his friends can expect to ‘win’. I don’t know what inspired the script-writers but that game resembles a lot our economic system.

The trapped participants represent humans of different races, kidnapped away from their cultures and brought to a gloomy place we call multiculturalism. There they are expected to start killing each other and all Nature, while behind the cameras the technocrat Jew, who orchestrated everything, enjoys the show.

It's Communism not Homeland Security