Author: admin

MARTYRDOM OF IMPERIAL RUSSIA

HONESTY BOX Our news isn’t free for those who work to bring it to you; we depend on donations and book investment (click Team Work). Please share our stories and purchase from our bookstore. русский: В правой колонке главной страницы есть опция выбора языка. Deutsche Es gibt eine Sprachauswahloption auf der rechten Seite der Homepage.

Across Russia’s vast eleven time zones Church bells toll as the nation evokes the centennial of the horrific and senseless slaughter of Nicholas II, Tsar of Imperial Russia, his wife, their five beautiful children, and staff. Dubbed Azrael’s abattoir the ritualistic and racist nature of their family’s diabolical end is marked in countless ways in every village and city.

97074_900

Before the outbreak of the 1914 ~ 1918 war Warsaw shops patronised by the Jewish community furtively sold greeting cards the message of which would be lost on most Gentiles. Each greeting card carried the image of the tzadik. This image depicts a Talmudic Jew with Torah in one hand and a white fowl in the other. The bird’s head is a facsimile of Imperial Russia’s Tsar Nicholas II. Below this image is the inscription in Hebrew:  “This is a sacrificial animal so is my cleansing; it will be my replacement and cleansing the victim.”

ty

“This is a sacrificial animal so is my cleansing”

This message relates to the Yom Kippur atonement ritual in which the live sacrifice is swung about the head before being slaughtered by the shechita method; the creature’s blood being drained. This greeting card is a copy of American (Jewish) greeting cards first discovered in the United States in 2007.

The ritual slaughter of Tsar Nicholas II was the dream of many Jews. This curiosity is dismissed by palace media as being due to the Tsar’s alleged anti-Semitism. In fact, his anti-semitism was hardly unique; many heads of state were outspoken in their criticism of the persistence of a Jewish bacteria subverting Gentile nations and constantly having to leapfrog over national frontiers to escape indignant duped hosts who had taken them in. It is estimated that Jews have the sole distinction of being thrown out of more than 200 nations after wearing out their welcome.

Upon their being arrested the revolutionary Yakov Sverdlov ordered the slaughter of Tsar Nicholas II, his entire family, and all assistants. Regicide was a cherished ambition for this Jewish revolutionary. This is proven by the text of leaflets written by Yakov Sverdlov. These were published May 19, 1905, a date that marks the birthday of Nicholas II. The text on the leaflets: “Struck your hour, the last hour of you and all yours!  This is a terrible judgment, the revolution is coming!”

The decision to massacre Russia’s Imperial family was taken by the Ural authorities. The decision is consistent with the stated demands of Yakov Sverdlov, Chairman of the Central Executive Committee of Soviets of Workers ‘and Soldiers’ Deputies.

The massacre’s organisers and accompanying guards were militants involved in the organisation of the future Communist party, R.S.D.L.P. Its 1905 genesis was in the Urals at when the group was under the direction of Yakov Sverdlov. At the time of the slaughter, the aforementioned were the main participants in the massacre of the Romanovs.

Long before the Wall Street-inspired 1917 coup that delivered Tsarist Russia to mostly American corporate interests, Yakov Sverdlov and Bolshevik insurrectionists served prison sentences or were otherwise exiled in Siberia. Militant Yakov Sverdlov was exiled to Turukhansk as was Josef Stalin, Julius Martov (Tsederbaum), and Aron Solts.

The malevolent Yakov Sverdlov gathered around him the most aggressive and ruthless elements of this loose-knit association of brigands. Yakov Sverdlov was reputed to be pathologically sadistic. Such were the gratuitous cruelties inflicted on those he regarded as expendable that even fellow party members already accustomed to extreme violence were appalled.

On the eve of the 1905 Revolution and during his exile Sverdlov formed an organisation known as The Battle Squad of the People Weapons (BONV). This sinister terrorist group slaughtered indiscriminately in ways that would make today’s ISIS terrorists appear docile by comparison. The band’s victims included anyone thought to be in the pay or sympathetic towards Tsarist Russia.

ee69fc72af8e8d217535ab9834a32f9a

The victims of Yakov Sverdlov and his band of brigands: Slaughtered at Ipatiev house. 1st row: Nicholas II and his family (Olga, Maria, Tsar Nicholas II, Tsarina Alexandra, Anastasia, Alexei, and Tatiana), surgeon to Tsar Eugene Botkin and Royal chef Ivan Kharitonov,  maid Anna Demidova and the Tsar’s valet Colonel Alexei Trupp.

The band increased its wealth following constant attacks on banks, post offices, cash desks, trains and shops. “They were desperate murderers” writes Eduard Hlystalov who describes the marauders leader as ‘the frail bespectacled Yakov Sverdlov.’

Philippe (Shaya-Isay Fram) Goloshchyokin, personal and plenipotentiary ambassador of Yakov Sverdlov, dealt with all the gang’s organisation detail. The Ural region was soon to become Yakov Sverdlov’s personal fiefdom.  The revolutionary placed those he considered loyal to him in government positions throughout the Urals region.

‘Under the protection of the Tsar’s personal bodyguards, the train carrying the soon to be martyred family departed Tobolsk on April 26, 1918, to arrive in Tyumen during the evening of April 27.  On April 30 the train from Tyumen arrived in Yekaterinburg, where Vasily Yakovlev signed over a delivery of the Imperial couple and their daughter Maria to the Head of Ural Council Alexander Beloborodov.

8UWNXh1PqNU

As the Bolsheviks increased their hold on Russia confidence was such that it was decided that the children, the ill Alexei and his sisters Olga, Tatiana and Anastasia were to re-join their mother, father, and sister Maria in Yekaterinburg. The children left Tobolsk in May 1918. Tsarevich Alexei and his three sisters arrived in Yekaterinburg on 23 May 1918, accompanied by a group of servants and officials of the royal retinue.

On July 16, 1918, the day before the massacre, there arrived in Yekaterinburg a special train consisting of a locomotive and a single passenger carriage. The few other passengers included one person in the black attire of a Jewish rabbi with his face disguised. The rabbi was greeted by Shaya Isaakovich Goloshchekin and accorded with maximum respect as might a visiting dignitary. The rabbi was accompanied by protection of six soldiers. Upon being directed to the basement of Ipatiev house the rabbi traced cabalistic signs on the wall: “The Tsar sacrificed, the kingdom destroyed! About this notifies all peoples.”

The leaders and organizers of the execution of the Tsar family.

Leading executioners of the Imperial family whose Jewish names appear in brackets. Left to right: Top (Yankel Solomon Movshevich Sverdlov) Yakov Sverdlov, Philippe Goloshchyokin (Shaya-Isay Fram Goloshchekin) and Pyotr Voykov (Pinhus Wainer). Bottom row: Alexander Georgievich Beloborodov (Vaisbart Yankel Isidorovich), Konstantin Myachin (Vasily Yakovlev) and  Georgy Safarov (Voldin).

MhhB5mcHe-g

The killers from left to right: Pyotr  Ermakov,  Mikhail Medvedev (Kudrin),  Pavel Medvedev,  Yakov Yurovsky and Grigory Nikulin.

Yurovsky's Family

Yurovsky’s Family

Yakov Yurovsky supervised the Imperial family’s assassination. He was responsible for administering the coup de grâce and afterwards searching the bodies. Pyotr Voykov (Pinhus Wainer) took part in the shooting and assisted in carrying out the coup de grâce by bayoneting their victims. Later, he was delegated to destroy the family’s remains by a combination of dismemberment and the use of sulphuric acid.

The scrawled writing was afterwards found on the walls of the room in which the Imperial family was slaughtered. These were translated and transcribed by German-Jewish poet Heinrich Heine (1797-1856). The lines appear on the wall which the Imperial family had their backs to whilst being gunned down. There was also writing discovered near the basement window of Ipatiev House.

Belsatzar ward in selbiger Nacht / Von seinen Knechten umgebracht or in English ‘Belsatzar was, on the same night, killed by his slaves.’

Belsatzar

In the Old Testament story, the King of the Gentiles, Belshazzar, saw ‘the writing on the wall’ foretelling his destruction (Daniel 5) and he was killed as punishment for his offenses against Israel’s God.

In a clever play on the original Heine quotation the unknown writer, almost certainly one of the killers, substituted Belsatzar for Heine’s spelling Belsazar, in order to signal even more clearly his intended symbolism. The Heine inscription described the racial / ethnic nature of the murders: ‘A Gentile king had just been killed as an act of Jewish retribution.’

According to the guard’s recollection, the Empress and Grand Duchess Olga with others during the massacre made a vain attempt at crossing themselves. Yakov Yurovsky reportedly raised his gun at Nicholas’s torso and fired; the Tsar fell dead after which his killer shot the schoolboy son of the Tsar and Tsarina.

An assortment of killers then began shooting chaotically until all the intended victims had fallen. Several more shots were fired and the doors were then opened to disperse the smoke and fumes. A few of the martyrs survived the carnage. These unfortunates were stabbed to death with bayonets by Peter Ermakov.  It was necessary for him and others to use bayonets as with the doors now open there was a need to keep the noise of the carnage muted.

The last martyrs to die were Tatiana, Anastasia, and Maria. Between them, the sisters were carrying a little over 1.3 kilograms of diamonds sewn into their clothing. This had given them a degree of protection from the gunshots. These young women and girls were bayoneted to death.

Olga sustained a gunshot wound to the head. Maria and Anastasia were said to have crouched up against a wall covering their heads in terror until they were shot down. The Jewish revolutionary Yakov Yurovsky personally killed Tatiana and Alexei. Tatiana died from a single bullet through the back of her head. Alexei received two bullets to the head, one behind the ear after the executioners realised he had not been killed by the first shot.  Anna Demidova, Alexandra’s maid, survived the initial onslaught but was stabbed to death against the back wall while trying to defend herself with a small pillow that was filled with precious gems and jewels.

101606508_large_4723908_1229356924_081215_massacre9

While the bodies were being placed on stretchers, one of the girls, possibly Anastasia, cried out and covered her face with her arm. Ermakov grabbed Alexander Strekotin’s rifle and bayoneted her in the chest. When it failed to penetrate the young woman’s torso he pulled out his revolver and shot her in the head.

Some of Pavel Medvedev’s stretcher bearers had by now begun to rifle through the victims’ clothes for valuables. On seeing such activity Yakov Yurovsky demanded that they surrender looted items or be shot.

Photo_119_-_Topazes_found_at_the_mine

In the hasty burial of the bodies, several jewels like these topazes were overlooked by Yurovsky’s murderers and eventually recovered by White Army investigator Nikolai Sokolov in 1919

The attempt to completely destroy the Imperial family’s remains began the following day. This operation was assisted by Yakov Yurovsky and carried out under the direction of Pyotr Voykov (Pinhus Wainer). The occasion was supervised also by Goloshchyokin and Beloborodov.

Pyotr Voykov recalled that dreadful scene with an involuntary shudder. He said that when this work was completed the dismembered cadavers were thrown down a forest mine. Upon this appalling scene of carnage was poured gasoline and sulphuric acid. In a vain attempt to destroy all evidence of the massacre the parts were afterwards allowed to burn for two days.

Pyotr Voykov afterwards recounted: “It was a terrible picture. We, the participants of the burning corpses were downright depressed about this nightmare. Even Yurovsky, in the end, could not resist and said that even those few days and he would have gone mad.” (Besedovsky G. Z. ‘On the Road to Thermidor’ M., 1997. S.111-116).

Soon after the massacre, Yekaterinburg was liberated by the White Armies. An aim of the liberating armies was to discover the mystery of the Imperial Russian family’s disappearance. To carry out his investigations the White Army’s delegated investigator, Nikolai Sokolov dressed as a peasant in order that he drew as little attention to himself as possible. It was at this point that the reward for the assassination of the Imperial family posted by Wall Street banker Jacob Schiff was settled. Jacob Schiff (1847~1920) is the Jewish-American banker whose financial clout funded the 1904 ~ 1905 Japanese in war against Tsarist Russia.  Schiff’s apologists and palace historians say the banker’s generosity was on account of the alleged anti-Semitism of Tsar Nicholas II.

On the basis of the material brought before it the White Army’s official investigator Nikolai Sokolov drew the following conclusions: ‘the corpses were brought to the mine under the cover of darkness in the early morning of July 17, 1918. Clothing was roughly cut (damage is found on buttons, hooks, and eyes). The corpses were then dismembered and completely destroyed by fire and sulphuric acid. At the same time, the bodies of those executed were heated with fat added to by lead from bullets. To explain the later finding of jewels Nikolai Sokolov explained that according to the testimony of the witness Tyegleva the Grand Duchess secretly sewed jewellery in her clothing. The princesses had also secreted gems in their apparel, some of which went unnoticed during the disposal of the family’s remains.

When the mine shaft was later excavated there were discovered much jewellery. From the torn brassieres a rain of pearls and precious stones cascaded. Some jewellery, mostly earrings, and pendants lay unnoticed in the surrounding grass. Despite the discovery of the jewellery the executioners and body disposal team worked quickly to finish their work with their paying attention to individual items. Witnesses reported the movement of cars and trucks, carts and riders near Ganina Yama 15 km north of Yekaterinburg. This area during the period July 17 to 19, 1918 was cordoned off by Red Guards. Nikolai Sokolov writes that during these days were also heard grenade explosions.

tyy

Ganina Yama (Ganya’s Pit or Ganina hole). Investigator Nikolai Sokolov at the site of a bonfire. Nikolai Sokolov devoted his life to collecting documents and evidence relating to the murder of the Romanovs.

Nikolai Sokolov later managed to find two orders drawn up by Pyotr Voykov on July 17, 1918. These orders had been placed with a local drugstore named Russian Society. Each order bore the requirement to issue employee Commissariat Zimin with sulphuric acid. The first order was for 5lbs with 3lbs more placed in the second jar. In total, Zimin was issued 11lbs of sulphuric acid for which was paid 196 roubles and 50 kopecks. According to Nikolai Sokolov, the sulphuric acid was delivered to the mine on 17 and 18 July.

At the mine itself traces of two large fires were discovered. Here, dozens of objects have since been discovered that relate to the murdered Imperial family.  Many items were burned or otherwise destroyed. Nothing was spared of the Tsar’s family; even their pet dogs were slaughtered.

mwalsh-sokolov

Nikolai Sokolov. To carry out his investigations the Nikolai Sokolov dressed in peasant in order that he draws as little attention to himself as possible.

Following the massacre of the Imperial family, the German-born Jacob Schiff celebrated the funding of the 1917 Bolshevik coup which had brought about regime change in Russia. Schiff had personally underwritten a substantial reward for the murder of the Russian royal family. This Jewish banker’s investment funded a tyranny which, at the time of its collapse in 1990, is estimated to have directly or indirectly led to a loss of life estimated between 70 and 100 million mostly European Christians. Thus, Jacob Schiff appears to have achieved the dubious distinction of being the biggest killer in the history of humankind.

On the night of the New York celebrations a letter penned by the banker was read out to the ecstatic attendees.:  “Will you say for me to those present at tonight’s meeting how deeply I regret my inability to celebrate with the Friends of Russian Freedom the actual reward of what we hoped for and striven for these long years.” ~ Jacob Schiff, New York bankers, ‘Kuhn, Loeb & Co. Quote: New York Times, March 24. 1917.

Jacob Schiff

From this point on the insurrection was to continue until 1922. Soon after the expulsion of the White Armies corporate America and Europe moved in to plunder the assets of the nation that was before the coup Imperial Russia.

Yekaterinburg bore the name of Sverdlovsk from 1924 to 1991. The street and Ipatiev House where the Imperial family was placed under house arrest before their slaughter was renamed Sverdlov Street. In this grim building, Imperial Russian Emperor Nicholas II, his family and members of his household staff, were massacred. In 1991 a decision was made that this city’s name be returned to its original name of Yekaterinburg.

2143b

The Russian President Vladimir Putin during his tenure has atoned for the crimes carried out by the Bolsheviks. Throughout the Russian Federation now appear monuments dedicated to the memory of the Gulag network of slave camps. Ipatiev House was razed to the ground during the Soviet period in 1977. Since, on the ruins of the demolished house, stands Yekaterinburg’s Church of the Blood Cathedral.  In addition to the cathedral the Church of St. Nicholas (the Tsar has since been canonised) has been built at the Romanov Monastery. This holy place of pilgrimage is situated close to where the Tsar and his family’s remains were discovered at Ganina Yama.

ган-яма

Tsar Nicholas II’s murder 100 years on: The terrible fate of Russia’s imperial family

Recommended books Trotsky’s White Negroes and Slaughter of a Dynasty by Michael Walsh

KEEP REAL NEWS OPEN: Donate by using PayPal, Western Union or registered mail. 2) Follow our blog. 3) Share our stories and 4) buy our books. 5) Receive free newsletters by writing subscribe to euroman_uk@yahoo.co.uk. Click ‘Mike Walsh’ to meet the publisher of The Ethnic European.

Megacaust plus link

Germany: Migrant Rape Crisis Still Sowing Terror and Destruction

  • The director of the Criminal Police Association, André Schulz, estimates that up to 90% of the sex crimes committed in Germany do not appear in the official statistics.
  • “There is a strict order by the authorities to not report on crimes committed by refugees,” a high-ranking police official in Frankfurt told Bild. “Only specific requests from media representatives about such acts are to be answered.”
  • Germany’s migrant sex-crime problem is being exacerbated by its lenient legal system, in which offenders receive relatively light sentences, even for serious crimes. In many instances, individuals who are arrested for sex crimes are released after questioning from police. This practice allows suspects to continue committing crimes with virtual impunity.

Germany’s migrant rape crisis continues unabated. Preliminary statistics show that migrants committed more than a dozen rapes or sexual assaults every day in 2017, a four-fold increase since 2014, the year before Chancellor Angela Merkel allowed into Germany more than a million mostly Muslim male migrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East.

A quarterly report — Criminality in the Context of Migration (Kriminalität im Kontext von Zuwanderung) — published by the Federal Criminal Police Office (Bundeskriminalamt, BKAshowed that migrants (Zuwanderer, defined as asylum seekers, refugees and illegal immigrants) committed 3,466 sex crimes during the first nine months of 2017 — or around 13 a day. (Final crime statistics for 2017 will not be publicly available until the second quarter of 2018.) By comparison, in all of 2016 migrants committed 3,404 sex crimes, or around nine a day; in 2015, 1,683 sex crimes, or around five a day; in 2014, 949 sex crimes, or around three a day; and in 2013, 599 sex crimes, or around two a day.

The actual number of migrant-related sex crimes in Germany, however, is believed to be far higher than the official number. For instance, the BKA data includes only crimes that have been solved (aufgeklärten Straftaten). On average only around half of all crimes committed in Germany in any given year are solved (Aufklärungsquote), according to police statistics.

The director of the Criminal Police Association (Bund Deutscher Kriminalbeamter, BDK), André Schulz, estimates that up to 90% of the sex crimes committed in Germany do not appear in the official statistics.

German police frequently omit any references to migrants in crime reports. When they do, they often refer to migrant criminals with politically correct euphemisms such as “southerners” (Südländer), men with “dark skin” (dunkelhäutig, dunklere Gesichtsfarbe, dunklem Hauttyp) or a combination of the two: “southern skin color” (südländische Hautfarbe). This practice, apparently aimed at delinking the attackers with Islam, makes it virtually impossible for German citizens to help police identify suspects.

“There is a strict order by the authorities to not report on crimes committed by refugees,” a high-ranking police official in Frankfurt told Bild. “Only specific requests from media representatives about such acts are to be answered.”

Germany’s migrant rape crisis has continued into 2018. Despite the mounting human toll, many of the crimes are unreported or downplayed as isolated incidents (Einzelfall) by German authorities and the media, apparently to avoid fueling anti-immigration sentiments.

  • On February 18, a 33-year-old woman was raped while visiting a cemetery in Bochum. The attacker ambushed the woman from behind and hit her on the head with a rock, rendering her unconscious. He then repeatedly raped her. Bochum police kept silent about the rape until pressed by Rheinische Post, a local newspaper. It subsequently emerged that the rapist is a convicted sex offender who had attended a “rehabilitation” program and was then released from custody.

    Authorities in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) apparently suppressed information about the rape to prevent public concern over the recidivism of convicted sex offenders. The police cover-up sparked public outrage. “The public, in my view, has a right to know that convicted sex offenders pose a real danger when they are back out,” said a senior detective. “When something as horrible as Bochum happens, it has to be called by name, without any ifs or buts. When such important information is withheld from the public, people think everything is fine and that of course participants will not relapse.” A police spokesperson said the media blackout was meant to protect the victim: “We know from psychologists that this is often very stressful for the victims.” After a backlash, Bochum police admitted to making a “mistake.”

  • On February 22, an 18-year-old British student on a class trip to Berlin was raped by two men after she became separated from her group. She was hospitalized for two days. Berlin police kept silent about the rape until the girl returned to Britain and her parents contacted British media outlets, which reported on the case. When pressed for information by Journalisten Watch, a media accountability group, Berlin police admitted that they had arrested two men in relation to the rape but released them due to a lack of evidence (Haftgründe lagen nicht vor).
  • On January 26, an “Asian or North African” man (orientalisch bis nordafrikanischer Herkunfttried to rape a female student at the Goethe University in Frankfurt. It subsequently emerged that three other women had been attacked by a man who police believe is the same individual. Although the attacks occurred on October 6, December 29 and January 6, university officials did not warn students that a sex offender was stalking the campus until February 2, four months after the first attack.
  • On January 11, an unidentified man sexually assaulted two 15-year-old girls on a subway train in Munich. One of the girls managed to take a picture of the man, but police refuse to make the image public. A police blotter asks the public to help them find the man, described as follows: “Male, 170cm, 20s, skinny, red overcoat, dark pants, black shoes.”
  • On January 10, police in Magdeburg released a photograph of a “dark-skinned” man (dunkle Hautfarbe) suspected of raping and seriously injuringa woman at the central railway station on June 27, 2017. Police did not say why they waited more than six months to make the image public.
  • On January 4, a 24-year-old man raped a woman at a school in Hanover. The police blacked out information about the man’s nationality. Bild filled inthe missing details: he is from Albania. A local newspaper, Hannoversche Allgemeine, initially reported that the man was from Albania; an hour later, however, it “updated” its story by replacing the word “Albania” with “the Balkans.”

Many rapes and sexual assaults occur on public transportation or transport hubs such as bus and train stations. The problem is especially acute in Berlin, where police received 296 reports of sexual assaults on buses and trains in 2017, almost twice as many as in 2016, according to Bild.

On March 4, for instance, a 30-year-old Egyptian man who raped at least four women at or near subway stations in Berlin turned himself in after police published surveillance photos of him. The man chose his victims while riding on subway trains. He made eye contact with them, followed them out of the station and subsequently raped them. Berlin police blacked out information about the man’s nationality. Berliner Zeitung filled in the missing details: he was born in Egypt.

On February 28, an 18-year-old Syrian asylum seeker sexually assaulted several women on a train to Munich. The man systematically made his way through the train and entered those compartments in which women were seated alone. He was arrested when the train arrived at the central railway station in Munich. Police said the man has a long rap sheet.

On January 10, a 31-year-old asylum seeker from Chad sexually assaulted two teenage girls on a regional express train originating in Müllheim. Police said the man had sexually harassed the girls on the station platform even before the train departed. After the girls boarded the train, he sat next to them and began sexually groping them. When girls then moved to another compartment, he followed and sexually assaulted them. The girls then locked themselves into one of the train’s restrooms and called police. The man was detained when the train arrived in Freiburg. Police said the man — who has multiple outstanding warrants for other sexual crimes — had been arrested a day earlier for assaulting a woman on another train, but was released.

Attacks on public transportation have now spread to all parts of Germany, in large cities and small towns:

  • Frankfurt, February 28. A 29-year-old asylum seeker from Ethiopia sexually assaulted a 34-year-old woman on a train.
  • Weilburg, February 24. A “southerner” (Südländermasturbated in front of an 18-year-old female passenger on an intercity bus to Weilmünster. Police said the man got on the bus, sat directly next to the woman, masturbated and alighted at the next stop.
  • Mühlhausen, February 13. Six “North African men” (Männer nordafrikanischer Herkunftsexually assaulted a 17-year-old woman on a regional train from Erfurt.
  • Friedrichshafen, February 15. An “Asian-looking” man (orientalisches Aussehenmasturbated in front of a female passenger on a train.
  • Heilbronn, February 14. An “Arab-looking man” (arabisch aussehende Mannsexually assaulted a 26-year-old pregnant woman at a bus stop.
  • Hamburg, February 12. An 18-year-old Afghan asylum seeker sexually assaulted a 19-year-old woman at the Jungfernstieg subway station.
  • Karlsruhe, February 11. Two “southern-looking” men (südländischem Erscheinungsbildsexually assaulted a 28-year-old woman on a tram.
  • Pforzheim, February 11. A 20-year-old Turkish man sexually assaulted a 17-year-old woman on a tram.
  • Zierenberg, February 7. A 25-year-old asylum seeker from Azerbaijan was arrested for sexually assaulting two teenage girls on a regional train.
  • Weil am Rhein, February 7. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkler Hautfarbesexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl at a subway station.
  • Schopfheim, February 1. A 61-year-old Indian man was arrested for sexually assaulting an 11-year-old girl on a train.
  • Heidelberg, February 1. A 21-year-old Eritrean man sexually assaulted a woman at a tram station.
  • Schwabing, February 1. An “Asian-looking” man (orientalisches Aussehenrubbed his exposed genitals on a 28-year-old woman on subway train.
  • Dresden, January 28. A “southern-looking” man (südländischem Aussehensexually assaulted a 20-year-old woman at a tram station.
  • Bad Schwartau, January 26. A “dark-skinned” man (dunklerem Hauttypsexually assaulted an 18-year-old woman at a bus stop.
  • Greifswald, January 20. Four “North African” men (nordafrikanischer Herkunftsexually assaulted a 33-year-old woman at the central railway station.
  • Mannheim, January 17. A 72-year-old Turkish man sexually assaulted a woman on an intercity train from Stuttgart.
  • Berlin, January 13. A 29-year-old Lebanese man masturbated in front of a 19-year-old woman on an intercity train. Police said the man was in Germany illegally.
  • Mannheim, January 9. A 28-year-old Afghan man sexually assaulted a 23-year-old woman on a tram at the central railway station. An hour later, he sexually assaulted another woman on a different tram. The man was questioned and released.
  • Munich, January 9. An “Indian- or Afghan-looking” man (indische/afghanische Erscheinungsexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl at the Harras subway station.

Many victims are children, some of whom have been attacked in front of their parents:

  • Mörfelden-Walldorf, February 27. A “dark-skinned” man (dunklen Teintexposed himself to several 11-year-old boys as they were walking home from school.
  • Velen, February 25. A “brown-skinned” man (leicht dunkler Hauttypexposed himself to at least four children at a campground.
  • Eberswald, January 26. Four 19-year-old Syrians tried to sexually assault a 14-year-old girl. When the girl’s father intervened, the Syrians threw him to the ground and punched and kicked him.
  • Mörfelden-Walldorf, January 26. A “dark-skinned” man (dunklen Teintexposed himself to an 11-year-old girl.
  • Moosach, January 24. A man speaking broken German approached an eight-year-old girl at a playground and kissed her on the mouth in front of her mother.
  • Schwenningen, January 11. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkle Hautfarbeassaulted two 11-year-old boys at a bus stop.

Sexual assaults have occurred in public spaces ranging from parks and pools to supermarkets:

  • Sulzbach, March 10. A “presumably Asian” man (vermutlich asiatischer Herkunftsexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl at an electronics store.
  • Weinheim, March 5. An “Eastern European” man (osteuropäisches Erscheinungsbildsexually assaulted two 14-year-old girls at a public swimming pool. Seven children have been sexually assaulted at the facility during the past 12 months.
  • Konstanz, March 3. A “Black African” man (Schwarzafrikanersexually assaulted a woman at a park.
  • Hagen, February 17. A “southern-looking” man (südländisches Aussehenexposed himself to a 68-year-old woman at a park.
  • Kitzingen, February 3. Three Afghan migrants sexually assaulted two girls at a public swimming pool.
  • Fellbach, January 10. A “dark-skinned” (dunklem Teint) man fondled himself in front of a 35-year-old woman at the city hall.
  • Hamburg, January 1. A 22-year-old Moroccan man sexually assaulted a 34-year-old woman at a hospital.

Many victims have been stalked and attacked while making their way to and from home:

  • Dresden, March 9. A “southerner” (Südländersexually assaulted a 27-year-old woman as she was entering her home in Dresden. A day later, a man of similar appearance sexually assaulted a 40-year-old woman as she was entering her home, also in Dresden.
  • Essen, March 2. A man speaking German with an accent sexually assaulted a 30-year-old woman who was walking home from the central railway station.
  • Werten, March 2. Three “southern-looking” men (südländisches Erscheinungsbildsexually assaulted a woman as she was getting into her car.
  • Dresden, February 5. A “southern-looking” man (südländisch aussehendsexually assaulted a 33-year-old woman as she was entering her home.
  • Krefeld, January 15. A “southerner” (Südländersexually assaulted an 18-year-old woman. The man and the woman were riding on the same tram and both got off at the same stop. She was walking home when the man ambushed her from behind.

Instances continue of taharush, a practice in which groups of males encircle females and assault them:

  • Essen, March 11. A group of seven “southern-looking” (südländisches Aussehen) teenage males speaking Arabic encircled and sexually assaultedthree teenage females.
  • Lienen, March 4. A group of ten migrants encircled and sexually assaultedseveral women at an outdoor festival.
  • Greifswald, January 20. Four “North African” men (nordafrikanischer Herkunftsexually assaulted a 33-year-old woman at the central railway station.
  • Düsseldorf-Altstadt, January 13. A group of young men encircled and sexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl.
  • Bremen, January 1. A group of young men encircled and sexually assaultedtwo women in the city center. Police arrested a 20-year-old Syrian man.
  • Rüthen, January 1. A group of young men encircled and sexually assaulted a 23-year-old woman.

Migrants with exhibitionist tendencies are omnipresent:

  • Oelde, February 22. A “yellow-looking” man (leicht gelblichen Teintexposed himself to several school girls. The same individual is believed to have exposed himself to two school girls in the same town on February 18.
  • Kirchheim unter Teck, February 17. A 22-year-old Iraqi man was arrested for exhibitionism.
  • Hagen, February 17. A “southern-looking” man (südländisches Aussehenmasturbated in front of a 68-year-old woman at a park.
  • Stuttgart-Degerloch, February 4. A “southern-looking” man (südländisches Aussehenexposed himself to a 32-year-old woman.
  • Heidelberg-Altstadt, January 21. An “Asian-looking” man (orientalisches Aussehenexposed himself to a 30-year-old woman.
  • Hamburg, January 18. A 21-year-old Somali man exposed himself to passersby at the central railway station.
  • Chemnitz, January 17. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkelhäutigexposed himself to a 15-year-old girl at a playground.
  • Unterjettingen, January 13. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkelhäutiger Mannfondled himself in front of passersby.
  • Tübingen, January 9. A “dark-skinned” man exposed himself and urinated while staring intently at a 23-year-old female student at the University of Tübingen. Police said the man is believed to have exposed himself in the same way to several other female students at the university.
  • Seckach, January 6. A “dark-skinned” man (dunklem Teintfondled himselfin front of a 17-year-girl on a train.

Germany’s migrant sex-crime problem is being exacerbated by its lenient legal system, in which offenders receive relatively light sentences, even for serious crimes. In many instances, individuals who are arrested for sex crimes are immediately released after questioning from police. This practice allows suspects to continue committing crimes with virtual impunity.

On January 2, for instance, prosecutors in Traunstein reopened a case involving a 22-year-old Afghan exhibitionist after pressure from a local newspaper. The man repeatedly exposed himself to a 15-year-old girl on a school bus. In one instance, the girl filmed the man fondling himself and exposing his erect penis. Prosecutors dropped all charges after the Afghan said he was “scratching his penis because of an itch.” After the Munich-based Wochenblatt uploaded the girl’s video on YouTube, prosecutors reversed themselves and ordered the man to appear in court.

  • Hamburg, March 4. A 25-year-old illegal migrant from Kosovo was arrested for sexually assaulting a 29-year-old woman. The man had an outstanding arrest warrant and was on a deportation list.
  • Bad Krozingen, February 19. A 22-year-old Gambian man sexually assaulted a 25-year-old woman at a park. Police said the man had sexually assaulted another woman on February 3.
  • Heidelberg, February 16. A 37-year-old Syrian man was arrested for sexually assaulting several women in the city center. The man was questioned and released.
  • Tübingen, February 13. A 44-year-old Libyan migrant was arrested for sexually assaulting a 17-year-old woman. The man was questioned and released.
  • Esslingen, January 29. An 18-year-old Afghan asylum seeker raped a 13-year-old girl. It later emerged that the Afghan had a previous rape conviction but in December 2017 a court in Stuttgart ordered that he be released from custody.
  • Münster, January 14. A 23-year-old Afghan man physically and sexually assaulted a woman on a train. The man was questioned and released.
  • Hennigsdorf, January 2. A 35-year-old Polish man attempted to rape a 41-year-old woman. The man was released from custody after posting bail of €300 ($370). Police said the man had attempted to rape another woman in Thüringen in November 2017. It remains unclear why police continue to release him.
  • Freiburg, December 26. A 32-year-old Algerian asylum seeker sexually assaulted two 17-year-old girls at the central railway station. Police said the man had five outstanding arrest warrants.

Migrants often show extreme disrespect respect for law enforcement officers:

  • Warstein, March 1. A 37-year-old Moroccan man sexually assaulted a 36-year-old woman. When police tried to arrest the man, he attacked the officers.
  • Mainz, February 24. A 28-year-old Kenyan man sexually assaulted a 22-year-old woman at a restaurant. When police tried to arrest the man, he attacked the officers.
  • Marburg, February 12. A 20-year-old Eritrean man sexually assaulted a woman at a railway station. When police tried to arrest the man, he kicked and punched the officers.
  • Görlitz, January 8. A 30-year-old Moroccan man exposed himself to two police officers at a railway station. The officers were questioning him when he abruptly dropped his trousers.

Germany’s mainstream media has been conspicuously silent concerning the migrant rape crisis. Only the most sensational crimes are covered by the national media, none of which has connected the dots and reported the big picture. This lapse may explain why there has been very little public outrage over the sanctioned criminality that has befallen so many German women and children.

(Image source: USAF/Margo Wright)

Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute.

Appendix

Sexual Assaults and Rapes by Migrants in Germany, January-February 2018.

Police blotters show that Germany’s migrant rape crisis — which continues unabated day after day — has now spread to cities and towns in all 16 of Germany’s federal states. Public spaces have become increasingly perilous for women and children; they have been attacked by migrants at beaches, bike trails, cemeteries, discotheques, grocery stores, music festivals, parking garages, playgrounds, schools, shopping malls, taxis, public transportation (buses, trams, intercity express trains and subways), public parks, public squares, public swimming pools and public restrooms. Nowhere is safe. Following are a few cases from just the first two months of 2018:

January 1. A 23-year-old Sudanese asylum seeker raped a 27-year-old woman in Speyer. A group of young men encircled and sexually assaulted two women in Bremen; police arrested a 20-year-old Syrian man. A group of four young men encircled and sexually assaulted a 23-year-old woman in Rüthen. Two Guinean men sexually assaulted a 32-year-old woman near the central railway station in Dortmund. A 22-year-old Moroccan man sexually assaulted a 34-year-old woman at a hospital in Hamburg. A man speaking German with a foreign accent sexually assaulted a woman in Schwabach. Two “southern-looking” men (südländischem Erscheinungsbildsexually assaulted a woman at a railway station in Karben-Kloppenheim; the men physically assaulted a passerby who tried to intervene. A “southern-looking” taxi driver (Südländersexually assaulted a female passenger in Bochum.

January 2. Two “Arab-looking” men (arabisch aussehenden Personensexually assaulted a 75-year-old woman as she was leaving a shopping center in Stadtallendorf. A man speaking a foreign language fondled himself in front of a female passerby at the Schlossgarten in Erlangen. The same man exposed himself to a female jogger. A 35-year-old Polish man attempted to rape a 41-year-old woman in Hennigsdorf. Police said the man had attempted to rape another woman in Thüringen in November 2017.

January 3. A “Turkish-looking” man (türkischstämmigsexually assaulted a 17-year-old girl on a bus in Potsdam as she was going to school.

January 4. A 24-year-old Albanian man raped a woman at a school in Hanover.

January 5. A man speaking broken German raped a 41-year-old woman in Ofterdingen. Two Afghan men (ages 25 and 17) sexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl at a tram station in Gera.

January 6. A man speaking broken German sexually assaulted a 33-year-old woman in Wolfenbüttel. A man speaking German with a foreign accent sexually assaulted a 22-year-old woman in Waiblingen. A 40-year-old Sudanese man sexually assaulted two women in Papenburg. A “dark-skinned” man (dunklem Teintfondled himself in front of a 17-year-girl on a train in Seckach.

January 7. Two “southern-looking men” (südländisch aussehenden Männernsexually assaulted a 15-year-old girl in Gera. A man speaking broken German sexually assaulted a 23-year-old woman in Leck. A “North African” man (nordafrikanisch aussehendsexually assaulted a 30-year-old woman in Dresden.

January 8. Police issued a composite sketch of a man who brutally raped a 23-year-old woman in the stairwell of her apartment building in Hanau. The man is believed to be responsible for at least four other sexual assaults in the city. A 30-year-old Moroccan man exposed himself to two police officers at a railway station in Görlitz.

January 9. A man speaking German with an Eastern European accent raped a woman in Nettetal-Leuth. A 24-year-old Afghan man tried to rape a 23-year-old Iranian woman in Grünstadt. A 28-year-old Afghan man sexually assaulted two women on two trams in Mannheim. Four “dark-skinned” men (dunkelhäutigassaulted a 29-year-old woman in downtown Bad Krozingen. Police said they may be the same men who sexually assaulted a 16-year-old girl in the same area on December 19. An “Indian- or Afghan-looking” man (indische/afghanische Erscheinungsexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl at the Harras subway station in Munich. A “dark-skinned” man exposed himself and urinated while staring intently at a 23-year-old female student at the University of Tübingen. He is believed to have exposed himself in the same way to several other female students at the university.

January 10. A 31-year-old asylum seeker from Chad sexually assaulted two women on a train originating in Müllheim. A “dark-skinned” man (dunklerer Teintexposed himself to a 15-year-old girl in Überlingen. A “dark-skinned man (dunkelhäutigen Tätermasturbated in front of passersby in downtown Augsburg. A “dark-skinned” (dunklem Teint) man fondled himself in front of a 35-year-old woman at the city hall in Fellbach.

January 11. A 20-year-old Afghan man sexually assaulted a 29-year-old woman, who was on a walk with her son, in Kassel. Two police officers witnessed the incident and arrested the man, who resides in a nearby refugee shelter. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkle Hautfarbeassaulted two 11-year-old boys at a bus stop in Schwenningen. A “presumably southern” man (vermutlich südländischer Abstammungmasturbated in front of a young woman at the Steele railway station in Essen. A man of “presumably foreign origin” (vermutlich ausländischer Herkunftfondled himself in front of a 15-year-old girl near the train station in Lingenfeld.

January 12. A “southern-looking” man (südländisches Aussehensexually assaulted a 22-year-old woman at a restaurant in Limburg. The man was trying to make eye contact with the woman and became enraged when she ignored him.

January 13. A 46-year-old Turkish man exposed himself to a 23-year-old woman and a 16-year-old girl at the central railway station in Mönchengladbach. A 25-year-old Iraqi man sexually assaulted a 20-year-old woman on a train between Münster and Dortmund. When two passengers intervened, the Iraqi physically assaulted them. A 29-year-old Lebanese illegal immigrant masturbated in front of a 19-year-old woman on a train in Berlin. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkelhäutiger Mannfondled himself in front of passersby in Unterjettingen. A group of young men encircled a 14-year-old girl and sexually assaulted her in Düsseldorf-Altstadt.

January 14. A 23-year-old Afghan man physically and sexually assaulted a woman on a train near Münster. The man was held for questioning and released. A 21-year-old Syrian asylum seeker sexually assaulted a 19-year-old woman in Hamburg.

January 15. An Arab-looking man sexually assaulted a 33-year-old woman in Horn. A “southern-looking” man (südländischen Aussehenexposed himself to two 13-year-old girls in Essen. A “dark-skinned” man (dunklen Teintsexually assaulted a 42-year-old woman in Krefeld. A “southerner” (Südländersexually assaulted an 18-year-old woman in Krefeld.

January 16. A 24-year-old Nigerian man tried to rape a 59-year-old Russian woman in Munich.

January 17. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkelhäutigexposed himself to a 15-year-old girl at a playground in Chemnitz. A 72-year-old Turkish man sexually assaulted a woman on a train between Stuttgart and Mannheim.

January 18. Two “North African” men (nordafrikanische Erscheinungsexually assaulted and robbed a 51-year-old woman in Trier. A 21-year-old Somali man exposed himself to passersby at the central railway station in Hamburg.

January 19. Six “dark-skinned” boys (dunkelhäutigen Jungensexually harassedfour teenage girls in Ueckermünde.

January 20. Four “North African” men (nordafrikanischer Herkunftsexually assaulted a 33-year-old woman at the central railway station in Greifswald.

January 21. A 19-year-old Ethiopian man sexually assaulted an 18-year-old woman in Gera. Two North African men sexually assaulted a 22-year-old woman in Greifswald. An “Asian-looking” man (orientalisches Aussehenexposed himselfto a 30-year-old woman in Heidelberg-Altstadt.

January 22. A “southern-looking” man (südländisches Aussehenexposed himselfto an 82-year-old woman in Neu-Ulm. A man of “Turkish or Arab appearance” (türkischer oder nordafrikanischer Herkunftsexually assaulted a 16-year-old girl in Freiburg.

January 23. A “foreign-looking” man (ausländisches Aussehenexposed himself to three women in Erlangen. A “dark-skinned” man (dunklen Teintsexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl in Groß-Gerau.

January 24. A man speaking broken German approached an eight-year-old girl at a playground and kissed her on the mouth in Moosach. Three “dark-skinned” man (dunklen Teintsexually assaulted a 29-year-old woman who was out walking her baby in Höchst.

January 25. A “North African” man (nordafrikanisches Erscheinungsbildsexually assaulted a 25-year-old woman walking home from a train station in Hamburg.

January 26. An “Asian or North African” man (orientalisch bis nordafrikanischer Herkunftraped a 22-year-old female student at the Goethe University in Frankfurt. The same man is thought to be responsible for the rape or attempted rape of three other women on the campus during the past six months. Four 19-year-old Syrians tried to sexually assault a 14-year-old girl in Eberswald. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkelhäutigsexually assaulted a 35-year-old woman in Dortmund. When she resisted, he slashed her stomach with a knife. A “dark-skinned” man (dunklerem Hauttypsexually assaulted an 18-year-old woman at a bus stop in Bad Schwartau.

January 28. A man speaking broken German sexually assaulted a 67-year-old woman in Bonn. A “southern-looking” man (südländischem Aussehensexually assaulted a 20-year-old woman at a tram station in Dresden. A 20-year-old German woman accidently bumped into a man at a carnival event in Münstertal in the Black Forest. When the woman apologized, the man, believed to be Russian or Eastern European, grabbed the woman’s arm and broke her wrist.

January 29. An 18-year-old Afghan asylum seeker raped a 13-year-old girl in Esslingen. It later emerged that the Afghan had a previous rape conviction but a court in Stuttgart had ordered him to be released from custody in December 2017. A “southerner” (südländischsexually assaulted a 16-year-old girl in Speyer. A “southern-looking” man (Südländisches Aussehenexposed himself to a 14-year-old girl in Wesel. A man speaking broken German sexually assaulted a 67-year-old woman in Bonn-Tannenbusch. A “dark-skinned” man (südländisches Aussehensexually assaulted a 22-year-old woman at a hospital in Moers.

January 30. A 45-year-old Iranian man raped a 41-year-old woman in Bothfeld.

January 31. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkle Hautfarbesexually assaulted a 16-year-old girl at a bus station in Goch.

February 1. A 61-year-old Indian man was arrested for sexually assaulting an 11-year-old girl on a train in Schopfheim. An “Asian-looking” man (orientalisches Aussehenrubbed his exposed genitals on a 28-year-old woman on subway train in Schwabing. A 21-year-old Eritrean man sexually assaulted a woman at a tram station in Heidelberg.

February 2. A “dark-skinned” man (dunklen Teintsexually assaulted a 15-year-old girl at a railway station in Überlingen. Although 10-15 people were present, no one intervened to help the girl. A 30-year-old West African man sexually assaulteda 52-year-old woman in Baden-Baden. A “southern-looking” man (südländisches Aussehensexually assaulted a 17-year-old girl in Weimar.

February 3. A man speaking German with an accent sexually assaulted a female train conductor at a subway station in Nürnberg. An “African-looking” man (schwarzafrikanisches Aussehensexually assaulted two women in Bad Krozingen. Three “southern-looking” men (südländischer Erscheinungsexually assaulted a 23-year-old woman in Herford. Three Afghan migrants sexually assaulted two girls at a public swimming pool in Kitzingen.

February 4. A “southern-looking” man (südländisches Aussehenexposed himselfto a 32-year-old woman in Stuttgart-Degerloch.

February 5. Three “dark-skinned” men sexually assaulted a 19-year-old woman at a bus station in Freiburg. A “southern-looking” man (südländisch aussehendsexually assaulted a 33-year-old woman as she was entering her home in Dresden.

February 7. A 39-year-old Syrian man sexually assaulted a 16-year-old girl in Uedem-Keppeln. A 25-year-old asylum seeker from Azerbaijan was arrested for sexually assaulting two teenage girls on a regional train in Zierenberg. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkler Hautfarbesexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl at a subway station in Weil am Rhein. A 17-year-old Iraqi raped a 14-year-old girl in Dresden.

February 8. A 23-year-old Romanian man raped a 39-year-old woman in a parking garage in downtown Stuttgart.

February 9. A “dark-skinned” man (dunklem Teintexposed himself to a woman at a clothing store in Kirchheim unter Teck.

February 10. A 25-year-old North African man sexually assaulted two teenage girls at the railway station in Oppum. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkelhäutig) sexually assaulted a woman at a bus stop in Tübingen.

February 11. Two “southern-looking” men (südländischem Erscheinungsbildsexually assaulted a 28-year-old woman on a street car in Karlsruhe. A 20-year-old Turkish man sexually assaulted a 17-year-old woman on a street car in Pforzheim.

February 12. A 20-year-old West African man raped a 65-year-old woman in Viersen. An 18-year-old Afghan asylum seeker sexually assaulted a 19-year-old woman at the Jungfernstieg subway station in Hamburg. A 20-year-old Eritrean man sexually assaulted a woman at railway station in Marburg. When police tried to arrest the man, he resisted by kicking and punching the officers. A “southern-looking” man (südländischer, dunkler Hauttypsexually assaulted a 15-year-old girl who was riding home from school on a bicycle in Wesel. A “southern-looking” man (südländisches Erscheinungsbildattempted to rape a young woman at a park in Aachen. A “dark-skinned” man (dunklen Teintsexually assaulted a 16-year-old girl in Riegel.

February 13. Six “North African men” (Männer nordafrikanischer Herkunftsexually assaulted a 17-year-old German woman on a regional train between Erfurt and Mühlhausen. A 44-year-old Libyan migrant was arrested for sexually assaulting a 17-year-old woman in Tübingen. He was questioned and released.

February 14. An “Arab-looking man” (arabisch aussehende Mannsexually assaulted a 26-year-old pregnant woman at a bus stop in Heilbronn.

February 15. An “Asian-looking” man (orientalisches Aussehenmasturbated in front of a female passenger on a train in Friedrichshafen. Two “Arab-looking” men (arabisch ausgesehenattempted to rape a 23-year-old woman in Bad Soden.

February 16. A 37-year-old Syrian man was arrested for sexually assaulting several women in downtown Heidelberg. The man was questioned and released.

February 17. A “southern-looking” man (südländisches Erscheinungsbildsexually assaulted an 18-year-old woman in Hamburg. He ambushed the woman from behind, sprayed her in the face with pepper spray to immobilize her and them assaulted her. A 22-year-old Iraqi man was arrested for exhibitionism at a shopping center in Kirchheim unter Teck. A “southern-looking” man (südländisches Aussehenmasturbated in front of a 68-year-old woman at a park in Hagen.

February 18. A 33-year-old woman was raped while visiting a cemetery in Bochum. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkelhäutigsexually assaulted a 25-year-old woman at knifepoint in Heidelberg-Weststadt. An “Indian- or Pakistani-looking” man (indisch/pakistanisches Aussehensexually assaulted a 33-year-old woman in Konstanz. A “yellow-looking” man (leicht gelblichen Teintexposed himself to two school girls in Oelde. The same individual is believed to have exposed himself to several school girls in the same town on February 22.

February 19. A 22-year-old Gambian man sexually assaulted a 25-year-old woman at a park in Bad Krozingen. Police said the man had sexually assaulted another woman on February 3.

February 22. An 18-year-old British student on a class trip to Berlin was beaten and raped by two men after she became separated from her group.

February 24. A 28-year-old Kenyan man sexually assaulted a 22-year-old woman at a restaurant in Mainz. When police tried to arrest the man, he became violent and attacked the officers. A “southerner” (Südländermasturbated in front of an 18-year-old female passenger on an intercity bus near Weilburg.

February 25. A “brown-skinned” man (leicht dunkler Hauttypexposed himself to at least four children at a campground in Velen.

February 26. A 43-year-old Pakistani man sexually assaulted a female passerby in downtown Pforzheim. Witnesses told police the man offered the woman cash for sex and turned violent when she refused. A “southern-looking” man (südländisches Aussehensexually assaulted a 30-yer-old female jogger in Aschaffenburg.

February 27. A “dark-skinned” man (dunklen Teintexposed himself to several 11-year-old boys as they were walking home from school in Mörfelden-Walldorf.

February 28. A 29-year-old asylum seeker from Ethiopia sexually assaulted a 34-year-old woman on a train near Frankfurt. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkelhäutigsexually assaulted a 17-year-old female near the railway station in Ravensburg. An 18-year-old Syrian asylum seeker sexually assaulted several women on a train to Munich. An 18-year-old Afghan asylum seeker was arrested at the central railway station in Berlin on charges of raping a woman in Schweinfurt in August 2017.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/12066/germany-rape-crisis

UK: Islamization Full Speed Ahead

Pictured: Anjem Choudary, a radical terrorist-linked Islamist cleric who has advocated sharia in the UK and is now serving a prison sentence for urging support for ISIS. (Photo by Oli Scarff/Getty Images)

  • This is how Islamization occurs and is made permanent: Other schools will think carefully of the risks before they even attempt to “limit the Islamization process”.
  • It is virtually impossible for “Islamophobia” to be “underreported” in London. The UK is nothing, if not clinically obsessed with “Islamophobia”. In 2016, London mayor Sadiq Khan’s Office for Policing and Crime announced it was spending £1.7 million taxpayer money policing speech online.
  • British police have even been taking lessons about Islam and “Islamophobia” from radical Islamist groups such as Mend. One of the most active Mend figures, Azad Ali, has said that he has “love” for Anwar Al-Awlaki, an influential US-born Islamic terrorist, who was killed by a US drone strike in Yemen in 2011.

The UK is accelerating its Islamization at an ever-increasing speed. The desire of the British establishment to submit to Islam appears to be overwhelming.

In a recent report, the Henry Jackson society exposed how the UK used taxpayer funds to support Islamist charities working against British society to the tune of more than six million pounds in 2017 alone. According to the report, “As the case studies in this report are illustrative rather than comprehensive, it is likely that this sum represents only the tip of the iceberg”. The report concludes, “Until more comprehensive action is taken, a network of Islamist extremists operating in the UK will continue to use charities and taxpayer money to fund the spread of divisive, illiberal and intolerant views within our communities”.

Among the charities detailed in the report, are several Islamic charities involved in dawa [outreach, proselytization], such as the Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA), as well as several charities connected to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, such as the Muslim Charities Forum (MCF) and Islamic Relief.

Deploying taxpayer money to support Islamic charities is not the only way in which the UK embraces Islamization.

St. Stephen’s Primary School in Newham, London, was recently forced to change its ban on hijabs for girls under the age of eight, even though, in Islam, girls are not obliged to cover themselves before they reach puberty.

This reversal happened after a massive coordinated backlash by Islamic organizations, such as the Muslim Council of Britain — which the UK government believes to be linked to the Muslim Brotherhood — and MEND. The campaign against the ban included a petition, signed by more than 19,000 people as well as local councilors. Ten Newham councilors protested that, “To attack an article of faith and clothing in this manner is an outrage and is simply wrong. The argument against allowing school children of whatever age, to wear a hijab actually goes against our fundamental values as a progressive, tolerant and inclusive society. We therefore call upon the school to overturn this decision immediately…” During the coordinated campaign against the hijab ban at the school, teachers were subjected to bullying and abuse, and the head teacher responsible for introducing the ban was compared to Hitler.

The school’s chair of governors, Arif Qawi, who had written in a social media post that he was trying to “limit the Islamisation process, and turn these beautiful children into modern, British citizens”, also had to resign. Miqdaad Versi, the assistant secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said his organization welcomed Qawi’s resignation, because of his “appalling” statements in support of the ban. “Yet serious questions remain unanswered as to the school leadership’s attitude towards Muslims, which are potentially discriminatory…We hope that future decisions are made carefully and with full consultation with local communities.” Versi said.

This is how Islamization occurs and is made permanent: Other schools will think carefully of the risks before they even attempt to “limit the Islamization process”. According to the former head of the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted), Sir Michael Wilshaw, the lack of a national policy on wearing hijabs in schools is due to political correctness, which leaves teachers “alone, isolated and vulnerable”.

“There’s something like 150 schools… which in short make it compulsory for youngsters to wear a hijab — so what’s happening about those schools?”, Sir Michael asked recently , “The country has enormously changed. When heads want to change things, they have now to take into account deep-seated and sincere feeling of communities, some of whom who have conservative views”.

The British state evidently cares less about Islamization — and the oppression of little girls — than about political correctness.

The clerical establishment is also pressing Britons to accept and accommodate the ongoing Islamization more readily. Archbishop Welby cautiously admitted in November 2016 that dealing with the religiously motivated violence in Europe “requires a move away from the argument that has become increasingly popular, which is to say that ISIS is ‘nothing to do with Islam’… Until religious leaders stand up and take responsibility for the actions of those who do things in the name of their religion, we will see no resolution.”

Since then, however, he appears dutifully to have returned to the submissive fold and in February 2018, he was once more preaching the politically correct gospel of “Welcoming strangers to our country and integrating them into our culture… We must be generous and allow ourselves to change with the newcomers and create a deeper, richer way of life”. One year ago, in February 2017, Welby suggested that Brexit and the election of Trump were both “in the fascist tradition”.

Britain’s security establishment also seems longing to submit to Islam. Scotland Yard recently warned that hate crimes (“Islamophobia”, in other words, as no other hate crime is taken as seriously) are “hugely underreported”. Chief Superintendent Dave Stringer, Scotland Yard’s head of community engagement said: “The Met has seen a steady increase in the reporting of all hate crime, particularly racist and religious hate crime. Despite this rise, hate crime is hugely underreported and no one should suffer in silence.”

It is virtually impossible for “Islamophobia” to be “underreported” in London. The UK is nothing, if not clinically obsessed with “Islamophobia”. In 2016, London mayor Sadiq Khan’s Office for Policing and Crime announced it was spending £1.7 million of taxpayer money policing speech online. Less than six months ago, London police teamed up with Transport for London authorities to encourage people to report hate crimes during “National Hate Crime Awareness Week”, which ran from October 14-21. The events were mainly targeted at Muslims, with officers visiting the East London Mosque to encourage reporting hate crimes. British police have even been taking lessons about Islam and “Islamophobia” from radical Islamist groups such as Mend. One of the most active Mend figures, Azad Ali, has said that he has “love” for Anwar Al-Awlaki, an influential US-born Islamic terrorist, who was killed by a US drone strike in Yemen in 2011.

Meantime, while the police obsess over “Islamophobia”, regular crime in London is exploding. The latest statistics from the London Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime show that in the past year, homicides have increased 27.1%, knife crimes have increased 31.3%, and there were 2,551 incidents of gun crime, representing a rise of 16.3%. Police recorded 7,613 rapes in the 12 months through January 2018 compared with 6,392 for the previous year, a rise of almost 20%. As reported by the Evening Standard, the figures also show an 8% increase in other sexual offences in the past year, bringing the total number of reported rapes and sexual assaults in London to almost 20,000. Campaigners have suggested the real figure could be “significantly higher” once unreported attacks are taken into account. British police, meanwhile, say they are at a loss to explain what is causing the rise in rapes.

The Metropolitan Police Deputy Commissioner Sir Craig Mackey was recently asked if he had any idea what was behind the surge. His answer: “No, is the honest answer… there is something going on with sexual offending in London that we don’t fully understand, the causes of it. We see the end of it, [but] we don’t understand the causes.”

Meanwhile, 65,000 cases of child sex abuse reached a record high in 2017, or 177 every day: up 15% from 2016.

In Rotherham alone, after 16 years of dismissing the problem, the number of child abuse cases rose to 1,510. The National Crime Agency (NCA) inquiry, “the biggest of its kind in the UK, has identified 110 suspects, of whom 80% are of Pakistani heritage”, officers said.

In its seeming eagerness to submit to Islam, the security establishment even appears to be willing to compare people responding to Islamization and Islamic terrorism with the Islamic terrorists themselves. In a recent lecture, one of the UK’s top counterterrorism officials, Assistant Commissioner Mark Rowley, outgoing head of counter-terrorism policing, compared Tommy Robinson, an anti-Islamist activist, often described as “far-right,” to Anjem Choudary, a radical terrorist-linked Islamist cleric who has advocated sharia in the UK and is now serving a prison sentence for urging support for ISIS.

“Robinson also became a regular fixture in our media, giving him the platform to attack the whole religion of Islam by conflating acts of terrorism with the faith, often citing spurious claims, which inevitably stirred up tensions” Rowe said, “Each side feeds into each other’s extremist rhetoric with the common goal of increasing tensions and divisions in communities”.

Rowe also said, “The right-wing threat was not previously organized. Every now and then there’s been an individual motivated by that rhetoric who has committed a terrorist act, but we’ve not had an organized right-wing threat like we do now”.

Perhaps Rowley might stop to consider why there is now an organized right-wing threat. The British establishment — people such as Rowley — have categorically embraced the “Islam is peace” narrative. The establishment has even let itself and its police be lectured by radical Islamist organizations such as Mend on what Islam is — and has doggedly refused to listen to any dissident voices. Large parts of the British population, therefore, have nowhere to turn with their frustrations at the rapid Islamization of British society, apart from anti-establishment or far-right organizations. No other organizations appear willing to have an open discussion about the ongoing Islamization. Rowley and other establishment figures, especially political ones, continue to evade responsibility for this upheaval — a situation that seems bound to continue, unless or until the British establishment — political, security, educational, clerical and cultural — begins to address, openly and honestly, the rapidly increasing speed of Islamization into British society.

Unfortunately, that enquiry appears unlikely to happen.
Judith Bergman is a columnist, lawyer and political analyst.

Source:

FBI Expresses ‘Grave Concerns’ About Release of the Memo on Alleged FBI Abuse

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) issued a statement defending itself and expressing “grave concerns” about a House Intelligence Committee memo due to be released in days.

The memo reportedly details abuse by senior Obama Justice Department and FBI officials in obtaining a surveillance warrant against Trump foreign policy campaign adviser Carter Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

“The FBI takes seriously its obligations to the FISA Court and its compliance with procedures overseen by career professionals in the Department of Justice and the FBI. We are committed to working with the appropriate oversight entities to ensure the continuing integrity of the FISA process,” said the statement.

“With regard to the House Intelligence Committee’s memorandum, the FBI was provided a limited opportunity to review this memo the day before the committee voted to release it,” it said, referencing FBI Director Christopher Wray’s viewing of the memo on Sunday.

“As expressed during our initial review, we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy,” it said.

House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) immediately fired back at the FBI in a statement:

Having stonewalled Congress’ demands for information for nearly a year, it’s no surprise to see the FBI and DOJ issue spurious objections to allowing the American people to see information related to surveillance abuses at these agencies.

The FBI is intimately familiar with ‘material omissions’ with respect to their presentations to both Congress and the courts, and they are welcome to make public, to the greatest extent possible, all the information they have on these abuses. Regardless, it’s clear that top officials used unverified information in a court document to fuel a counter-intelligence investigation during an American political campaign.

Once the truth gets out, we can begin taking steps to ensure our intelligence agencies and courts are never misused like this again.

The four-page memo reportedly summarizes some classified information that committee staffers were allowed to view in a secure setting and take notes on, but not to keep.

Republicans on the committee have used the words “shocking” to describe the memo, but they also say it is based on facts.

Democrats on the committee have offered shifting explanations as to why the memo should not be released — that it was dangerous to national security; that readers would not understand; and that it is a distortion of the facts.

They have drafted their own memo, which they argue will dispute the Republican memo and give their own context. The committee voted earlier this week to make that memo available to all House members first, before it is made public, as with the original memo.

The memo is slated to be released this or next week, barring any objections from the president.

The New York Times on Wednesday reported that FBI officials “say privately” that Trump, in approving the memo’s release, is “prioritizing politics over national security” and “putting the bureau’s reputation at risk.”

Republicans argue that the FBI opposes releasing the memo since it will expose its own wrongdoing, and that there is no reason to submit a memo exercising oversight on the DOJ and the FBI to those agencies to approve the release of.

Earlier this week, Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe announced he was going on terminal leave, after FBI Director Christopher Wray reportedly viewed a Justice Department inspector general report that said McCabe did nothing for three weeks after learning there were Hillary Clinton emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop.

Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who is reportedly mentioned in the memo for extending the spy warrant on Page, visited the White House to meet with Chief of Staff John Kelly on Monday for a “last-ditch effort.”

Kelly, however, said on a Fox News radio show Wednesday morning that he expected the memo to be released “pretty quick.”

Sweden’s Highway to Hell

By Thomas Müller

The lugenpresse at the Times of London were forced by necessity to report on actual news-on-the-ground in the migrant-swamped city of Malmo, Sweden. Thanks for finally playing. Sweden has been “experiencing an unprecedented surge of gang shootings, bombings and sexual assaults,” the Times admitted. “People use machine guns and hand grenades — they want to kill,” said Zoran Markovic, the former chief of community policing in Rosengård. Anti-tank weapons were found in a basement.

Rosengård’s force works from a black fortress of reinforced concrete with narrow windows and a 10-foot-high electric fence. It was bombed last week, days after a police car was blown up.

The New Nationalist (TNN) conducted open-source research on the size and composition of the Malmo migrant gangs and found information shockingly scarce — no doubt part of the PC black-out on the topic.

There was poor news coverage even within Sweden, which is hardly a surprise. Real news media would have investigative journalists on this; but this, too, seems lacking. Coverage that does exist, such as the following headline from a TIME magazine article, uses politicized gaslighting against the code words “Alt-Right” and “conspiracy theory” instead of real investigative reporting.

“More than 36 percent of young Swedish women say they feel unsafe at night,” the article continues. The authorities have admitted they are unable to investigate rape cases immediately because the resources are focused on gang crime. “We are forced to choose between two evils,” the police said.

According to the article, Stefan Lofven, the far left Social Democratic Party prime minister (whose pro-Third World immigration and “asylum” policies are the cause of the migrant invasion and violence), said last week that he was ready to deploy the army into the “affected areas.”

Even the Swedish Democrat leader Jimmie Akesson “declared war” against organized crime and suggested that Sweden should deploy the military to no-go zones to counter the out-of-control violence.

“People are shot to death in pizza restaurants, people are killed by hand grenades they find on the street,” Akesson said in parliament on Wednesday. This is the new Sweden; the new, exciting dynamic, multicultural paradise that so many here in this assembly … have fought to create for so many years,” he said sarcastically.

Last year, BBC showed just how dishonest — and we would suggest malintentioned — they are by coining an article showing that sex offences have stabilized in recent years. A precocious 13 year old could tell you by looking at Charts 1 and 2 that, yes, the parabolic rise has ended and only because Sweden is no longer offering significant numbers asylum. But the damage is done. Sweden now has one of the highest per-capita rape rates in the word [see Chart 3].

A Question No One is Asking

Is there something else to this deluge of riffraff descending upon Sweden? Could it be much more deliberate and weaponized than anyone ever imagined? Could the politicians and international agencies responsible be traitors and fifth columnists of the worst kind? It appears that gangsterism has been transferred from Somalia to Malmo.

One Somali journalist returned to her country out of fear and stated that it’s safer at home than in PC Sweden, given that at home the issue is treated with greater honesty.

Also consider that in the last few years Somalia has enjoyed a solid economic and social recovery. Work is available and investors from China, Qatar, Turkey and India are coming in. There is little reason to be offering refugee status to Somalians now as their country could also use its better-quality people.

Did someone take the lowest common denominator out of Somalia, Eritrea and Afghanistan and dump it on Sweden? Additionally, the anti-social impact of the Somalian diaspora has been much less elsewhere. Did Sweden get the special treatment? Is this why the background on these criminals is so hard to ascertain? The push was orchestrated by wealthy usual suspect internationalists allying with a twisted, inverted, masochistic, brainwashed element within Swedish society itself.

TNN Takeaway: No European country should allow unmanageable populations of Africans and Middle Easterners. But even more importantly, those small numbers that are let in should be heavily screened. Adding insult to injury, Swedish fifth columnists arranged for a criminal element to enter. The traitorous and disgraced Swedish government is responsible for trashing their country and needs to be condemned, canned and replaced with adult supervision. And I am not buying the “incompetence” lie.

For those who cry racist, ask what the impact and outcry would be if Sweden sent its 1,000 most dangerous and worst white criminals to some country with a different culture and race, and that country stood by in political correctness and a news blackout while they formed criminal gangs and raped the native women.

Congratulations, idiots, you have Brazilified your country. When the new adult supervision is established, they can consult with the BOPE from Rio de Janerio and employ tactics as illustrated in the following video clip. BOPE can bring to Sweden the benefit of years of experience dealing with Hell.

Source:

National Socialist Racial Thought

By Dr. Walter Gross

Head of the Reich Bureau for Enlightenment on Population Policy and Racial Welfare

Of all the measures introduced in the new Germany those bearing on National Socialist racial policy caused the greatest stir internationally, for here was a State setting its feet upon paths hitherto almost untrodden and leading through untouched preserves, whose aims were in many respects liable to clash with established Liberal views. Relevant legislation served to corroborate and achieve these aims and it was no wonder, therefore, that – in the beginning at least – this particular phase of National Socialist reconstruction met with universal misunderstanding and prejudice.

We are happy meanwhile to be able to discern that other nations have come to realize that Germany is, indeed, taking to new paths, but they are right ones and are necessary and, more than that, Germany is in many respects blazing a trail for others; mention need only be made of our law for the prevention of the transmission of hereditary diseases (Sterilization Law) which has been followed in Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland by similar laws or draft proposals. However, no one will wholly understand or sympathize with our legislation who is not wholly familiar with the fundamental change in the philosophical. conception of life which has come with National Socialism in the light of history.

Whereas formerly, and more especially under the powerful influence of Marxist teachings, the development and decline of States and civilizations was attributed to economic or purely political causes, we see to-day the determining role played by the human being in sustaining and shaping economy, the State, culture, politics, art and intellectual thought.

We have come to feel that the protection and preservation of the people who, after all, are originally responsible for the achievements of the State and culture, is the chief factor in retaining these achievements; for good blood and the strength that comes from good blood is given a people only once and if allowed to degenerate cannot be regenerated as one would rebuild a city or restore devastated lands.

Thus, wise statesmanship will place the preservation of the biological, that is, racial energy of its people before its political and economic concerns. The endless series of past empires and civilizations which have flourished and declined forcefully remind us how inexorable are the consequences of ignoring this truth.

History and the study of the science of population show that there are three biological stages which inevitably lead to the destruction of the vitality of a people and with it the destruction of the foundations of the State and culture as such. These three stages are:

A decreasing population,
An increase of the hereditary unfit,
The promiscuous mingling of races.

In these respects, Germany’s position in 1933 was alarming. A declining birth-rate among the fitter inhabitants and unrestrained propagation among the hereditarily unfit, the mentally deficient, imbeciles and hereditary criminals, etc., had led, for instance, to a state of affairs in which the increase of the healthier section of the population in the past 70 years was only 50 per cent., while the unhealthy and, in fact, those only fit to live in asylums, had multiplied ninefold in the same time, or 450 per cent.

The care of the latter costs the working population of Germany the not inconsiderable sum of 1 billion reichsmarks yearly, while the entire administrative costs of the Reich, Provinces and Communes amount to 713 million reichsmarks. It was, therefore, an act of self-preservation which caused the National Socialist State to promulgate the Law to prevent the transmission of hereditary disease. It was a measure taken in self-defence and much more besides. For a large portion of the hereditary unfit had brought children into the world in ignorance of the consequences of their own afflictions, and many – those still possessed of a sense of responsibility – were horrified at seeing the “sins of the fathers” visited upon their children. To this unfortunate category the National Socialist State lends a helping hand in freeing them from possible mental torment. Sterilization relieves their conscience of the frightful burden of causing further pain and suffering to innocent beings.

It is frequently claimed abroad in circles hostile to Germany that the politically undesirable are hauled up for Sterilization. Anyone versed in German Law and the thoroughness and precautions attendant on the whole procedure knows full well the absurdity of such allegations and that no one can be sterilized simply on request or as a result of political pressure.

The law for the prevention of the transmission of hereditary disease is only applicable in acknowledged cases of physical and mental deficiency such as congenital idiocy, schizophrenia, manic-depressive insanity, hereditary epilepsy, chronic St. Vitus dance, hereditary blindness, deafness and serious bodily defects; in addition, it applies to chronic inebriates. The procedure in regard to the act of Sterilization can take place upon application being lodged with the special Court of Heredity by the person concerned, his relatives, a local physician or such official persons as are connected with matters of public health.

The competent Court, which is composed of an officiating judge, a medical officer and a doctor, decides whether Sterilization is called for or not. If the applicant or person under consideration does not agree with the decision of the Court, an appeal may be lodged with the Higher Court which has a similar composition as the Lower Court, although the individuals are never the same. The decision of the Court of Appeal is final. Even then the operation may be avoided by taking life-long sojourn – or at least for as long as the faculty of procreation exists – in a private home, provided such sojourn entails no costs for the Government. This clause was included in order that possible adherents of the Catholic faith who might have conscientious objections on the grounds of the Papal encyclical be given the opportunity of observing their religious tenets at all costs.

These measures of the National Socialist State, despite their broadmindedness, have been attacked mainly for political or dogmatic reasons. Such criticism is based on a number of objections which appear unfounded and extravagant. They may be summarised in three groups.

The first arises purely from the individualist standpoint which resents any intrusion into the life of the individual. According to its advocates, the individual has the right to be without children if he prefers or, despite obvious hereditary afflictions, procreate at will, or indeed, by transcending all frontiers and racial barriers, to contract marriage to his own taste. Fundamentally, that is, any restriction on the life of the individual demanded by the collective interests of the community is categorically rejected. Obviously, such an attitude must be deplored in every State since, if applied in all spheres, it would render communal and State institutions, both economic and cultural, impossible.

Civilisation is only possible through the individual becoming part of the whole and just as collective authority in the interests of all limits the egoism of the individual by, say, taxation laws or measures to combat epidemics, etc., it similarly has the right to implement such measures for the benefit of the community as are scientifically proved expedient in the way of population policy or eugenics. The need for such action prevailed in Germany.

The second set of objections is mainly based on humanitarian grounds. It is argued, for instance, that the act of sterilisation represents such a weighty sacrifice for the person concerned that society should only accept it if made voluntarily. But it is not humane that among civilised peoples the standard of living of that section of the population which is fit and able to work is lowered by burdening it with the excessive levies necessary for the maintenance of and keeping within its midst the hereditarily diseased who, despite these heavy costs, can never be healed of their ailments. After all, the healthy members of the race are also entitled to a share of compassion and humane considerations.

Nor is it justifiable to argue that sterilisation will not do away with the possible recurrence of similar cases. In arguing thus one might just as well refrain from putting out a fire because another might happen to break out elsewhere at some other time. Incidentally, sterilisation is and remains a humane duty to the individual. How great is the mental agony of a person suffering from some hereditary disease in the pitiful knowledge that not only he himself is incurable but that his children frequently begotten in ignorance of the complications of his own trouble, are doomed to a similar or worse fate. Timely sterilisation rids the hereditarily unfit of such mental torment.

Other objectors insist that the operation should only be performed with the consent of the individual. It is foolish, however, to want acquiescence from a human being who has no command over his morbid instincts or of one who is to be prevented from procreation for the very reason that he is suffering from some mental debility.

Everywhere in organised society, justice and morals are bound to interfere with personal liberty to a greater or lesser extent, even with that of the healthy individual. If an epidemic breaks out endangering the welfare of the community everyone, whether he wants to or not, must be vaccinated; similarly, just as the doctor takes preventive measures on this score, the specialist in the sphere of hereditary transmission, both medical and legal, backed by the knowledge of biological necessities must, if called upon, take upon his shoulders the responsibility which the individual patient is unable to bear.

A third and last group fears lest the suggestion of a biological stratification of society or the racial classification of humanity should lead to serious conflicts. As to this, it may be said that racial peculiarities are natural and any social or human system of differentiation will last only so long as it is in harmony with natural phenomena. Why, the very knowledge and acknowledgment of the social claims of the race, of racial hygiene, and its practical application, is calculated to limit, even prevent wars.

For war, even if successful, signifies biologically an irretrievable loss of the best hereditary tendencies. Since National Socialist Germany frankly thinks along biological lines she wants nothing but peace. The National Socialist idea of State is the most peaceful conceivable, for it of all others sees its duty in the preservation of the pure racial continuity of its people. Nothing but sheer want of sense could accuse the new Germany of hankering after war. For we are only too well aware what irreparable damage has been done and how heavy has been the toll taken of our people in the way of hereditary values through centuries of retrogressive selection, declining birth-rate and, finally, through the frightful decimation of the flower of our manhood in the War.

If we need peace and quiet for the political and economic regeneration of our people tried almost beyond endurance, we need it doubly so to effect the reconstruction and vital racial aspirations of our population policy directed along biological lines, for nothing could be more disastrous than war with its ruthless destruction of the best and consequent indirect preferential selection of the less valuable.

Even a victorious war is biologically a loss. The true statesman is aware of this and will never take to the sword except as a last necessity. Here it becomes manifest that the national-racial principle – contrary to the aims maliciously attributed to it – is in itself the surest guarantee for a policy fundamentally peaceful.

Most open to misinterpretation are National Socialist views on the relations between the various races of the world. It has been questioned whether the fundamental racial principles of the new world theory must not breed condescension, even contempt of people of different race. Quite the contrary; these very principles offer the very best guarantee for mutual tolerance and for the peaceful co-operation of all.

We appreciate the fact that those of another race are different from us. This scientific truth is the basis, the justification and, at the same time, the obligation of every racial policy without which a restoration of Europe in our day is no longer practicable. Whether that other race is “better” or “worse” is not possible for us to judge.

For this would demand that we transcend our own racial limitations for the duration of the verdict and take on a superhuman, even divine, attitude from which alone an “impersonal” verdict could be formed on the value or lack of such of the many living forms of inexhaustible Nature. But we of all people are too conscious of the inseparable ties of the blood and our own race to attempt to aspire to such an ultra-racial standpoint, even in the abstract.

History, science and life itself tell us in a thousand ways that the human beings inhabiting the earth are anything but alike; that, moreover, the greater races are not only physically but especially spiritually and intellectually different from each other. Yesterday one passed this fact by, and in attempting to unify political, economic, cultural and religious standards for all nations of the earth, one was sinning against Nature, violating the natural attributes of various racial and national groups for the sake of a false principle. To-day we bow to the racial differences existing in the world. We want every type of being to find that form of self-expression most fitted to its own particular requirements.

The racial principles of National Socialism are, therefore, the surest guarantee for respecting the integrity of other nations. It is incompatible with our ideas to think of incorporating other nationalities in a Germany built up as a result of conquests, as they would always remain – because of their alien blood and spirit – a foreign body within the German State. Such foolhardy thoughts may be indulged in by a world which has as its goal economic power or purely territorial expansion of its frontiers, but never by a statesman thinking along organic, racial lines whose main care is the preservation of the greatness and along with it the essential unity of his people held together by the ties of blood relationship.

For this reason, we have nothing in common with chauvinism and imperialism because we would extend to other races peopling the earth the same privileges we claim for ourselves: the right to fashion our lives and our own particular world according to the requirements of our own nature.

And if National Socialism would wish to see the unrestricted mixing of blood avoided for the individual, there is nothing in this to suggest contempt. After all, we Germans ourselves, viewed ethnologically, are a mixture. The National Socialist demand is only that the claims of the blood and the laws of biology should be more closely observed in future.

Here again our standpoint is not so very far removed from that of other people with a sound mental outlook. The American Immigration Laws, for instance, are based on definite racial discrimination. The Europeans and the inhabitants of India, the Pacific Islands, etc., have instinctively held aloof from a mingling of the blood, and both sides genuinely regard any transgression as very bad form. Nevertheless, this natural attitude in no way detracts from the possibility of close co-operation and friendly intercourse. And, speaking on behalf of the new Germany, let me once more emphasise:

We do not wish our people to intermarry with those of alien race since through such mingling of the blood the best and characteristic qualities of both races are lost. But we will always have a ready welcome for any guests who wish to visit us whether of kindred or foreign civilisation, and our racial views only lead us to a fuller appreciation of their essential peculiarities in the same way as we would want our own peculiarities respected.

On the basis of this reasoning, the National Socialist State was bound to object to the imperialistic designs of the Jewish people on German soil. Thus it is purely an internal concern of the German people who could no longer tolerate the domination – a result of political errors in the past – of an alien race having neither sympathy nor understanding for them. During the political regimes of the past the Jews had managed to obtain an increasing hold on politics, art, culture and commerce. Since 1910, as many as 13 of them had immigrated every day into Germany from the East. Thus Berlin had –

32.2 per cent. Jewish    chemists
47.9      ”           “           doctors (60 per cent, panel doctors)
50.2      ”           “           lawyers
8.5       ”           “           newspaper editors
14.2      ”           “           producers and stage managers
37.5      ”           “           dentists

No people on earth with a vestige of pride in itself and its national honour will be willing to put up with such domination of the key professions by members of a completely alien race. At the same time, the Jews were a determining factor in those political parties which were against any reconstruction on national lines. As to the so-called State Party, for instance, 28.6 per cent. of its parliamentary members were Jews, and in the Social Democratic Party the figure was 11.9 per cent. It is of some political significance that the founders of the German Communist Party, a branch of the Moscow Comintern, that destructive force, were Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg, both Jews.

This predominance of alien influence foreign to the German nature in politics, science and things cultural, provided the objective for the law for the restoration of professionalism in the Civil Service and what has since come to be known as the Nuremberg Laws.

The Jews in Germany constitute a group of aliens who can expect to enjoy the hospitality of the country just like the members of other races. But no Frenchman would wish to have his leading offices of State occupied by Englishmen, and no Englishman would want to see the key positions in the politics, art and culture of his country occupied by, say, Japanese. Who then can reasonably object to the Germans removing the Jews from the prominent positions in their country?

As to the higher percentage of crime which is an additional factor of importance in judging the Jewish question in Germany, it may be mentioned that the majority are immigrants from Eastern Europe, whose cultural and moral ideas could never be in harmony with those of the German people. The Nuremberg Laws, therefore, exclude members of the Jewish race from obtaining Reich citizenship.

Persons of mixed parentage – some 300,000 in all – can become citizens of the Reich, but are excluded from holding office in the Civil Service, the Army and the medical and legal professions. Exemptions are possible as provided for in the Laws. The regulation forbidding marriage between a Jew and a German and making illicit intercourse liable to punishment was designed primarily with a view to preventing the birth of further individuals of mixed blood whose fate is a sorry one everywhere in the world, because they are neither one thing nor the other. For those already in existence a distinction is made between those having two Jewish grandparents and those with only one.

The former require the approval of the authorities for contracting marriage with someone of German or allied blood. The latter may not marry a Jew or a member of the former category. They may only marry people of German blood and their children are exempt from the restrictive regulations (Army Laws and the Law for the restoration of professionalism in the Civil Service, etc.). In short, their children become full members of the German community.

These measures were necessary because we realized that a nation or a people can only preserve its culture and its intellectual individuality by keeping the blood pure. It has been said that “every race is a divine inspiration” – a shaft incidentally aimed at the racial policy. We would re-join, however, “just because every race is a divine inspiration, the foremost task of civilization is to keep that inspiration pure and reject the least contribution towards detracting from its purity.”

Source: http://www.renegadetribune.com/national-socialist-racial-thought/

African Gangs: the Plague Upon Melbourne, Australia

By Thomas Müller

Australia is suffering from the same type of Saul Alinskyite neo-Marxist infestation as Sweden. Fifth columnists infiltrated the judiciary, media, police and government. This is NOT organic, and it has manifested itself in the form of rampaging mobs dominated by black African youth. Presented below is a sampling of videos illustrating this issue.

Keep in mind that unlike in Europe, African migrants didn’t just arrive on floating rafts. There is some 5,500 miles (8,800 km) between the eastern most part of the African continent and the western most part of Australia, and it’s at least a 10-hour flight. So the question begs: How did they get there? Who brought them into Australia?

As background, there are 24,000 Sudanese, 10,000 Somalis, 18,000 from Mauritius and a few thousand from various other African countries in Australia. The epicenter of the mob is Melbourne and is largely Sudanese. The Sudanese arrived between 2003 and 2006, meaning that most of the young vagabundos were raised in Australia.

A second large wave of migration from the dark continent to Australia occurred between 2011-12. As we also saw in Sweden, there was a special criminality in that second wave that jump-started rampant wilding and mob behaviors. Selected for ultimate chaos? A real investigation would look into the parties responsible for that importation of thugs. The fact that this hasn’t happened is extremely suspicion.

As seen in Europe and America, government groups and some media employ cheap shadow-word games and lies to describe the situation. Victoria Deputy Police Commissioner Shane Patton said that “networked criminal offenders” are not technically “gangs,” because they lack any organised structure. Then, as the incidents pile up, Patton claimed the group was “just an alcohol-affected mob.” In fact, the drug of choice is Khat, an amphetamine-like stimulant that is said to cause excitement and euphoria. You will see the jazzed up effect in the video clips.

It is now admitted that new and more-dangerous mob operatives are on the scene. One is appropriately called Menace to Society (MTS). Its modus operandi has expanded to targeting and ambushing police.

In December, MTS took over and tore up a Melbourne community center and turned it into a drug dispensing hangout.


Melbourne’s expensive and once vaunted Metro line system has been badly harmed by gangbangers. Notice that this TV station had to resort to a FOI to get the data on this from police.

It was claimed that the initial gang, Apex, was primarily composed of young Sudanese men and boys, but Victoria Police has since stated that the gang is a “non-entity,” is “no longer and never was predominantly African” and that “a large cohort of that gang was in fact Australian-born offenders.” Police claimed Apex had little structure and no official colors. However, when one examines the video, there’s clear evidence. The following clip shows a black mob going right into middle-class neighborhoods, and specific garb [at minute 1:28] is quite apparent.

This trying to stick it on “Australian born natives” didn’t go over well in sane Australian circles as there is clear video evidence and documentation showing almost all are dark skinned individuals.

photo: Herald Sun

Next, leaders in the African community admitted they do have issues with a small cohort of African youth who are committing high-end crimes, Patton told The AustralianIf we apply logic, it’s evident in the videos that hundreds — if not thousands — of African youth are involved in these wildings. If we take the total Sudanese and Somali population of 34,000 and subtract out those not between 12 and 25 years old, we are left with perhaps 5,000 to 7,000 youth. In reality, a far-too-large percentage of them are drugged wilders.

After the Moomba Festival fireworks on the night of Saturday March 13, 2016, there was a brawl in and around Federation Square in Melbourne’s Central Business District, largely between members of Apex and Islander 23Around 200 mostly young men participated in the brawl. Eyewitnesses said it looked organized. Incredibly, only four were arrested.

Facts on the ground point to African girls egging on the action and brawling. This is similar to wilding behaviors seen in mall mob events in the U.S. Witnesses put the wilder mob size at St. Kilda Beach as 200. And once again, eyewitnesses describe the perps as organized, with whites being the targets.

As wildings incidents mounted, Border Force Chief Roman Quaedvlieg stated that mob members could be deported under legislation previously used to deport outlaw motorcycle club members. Anthony Kelly, head of the Flemington and Kensington Community Legal Centre, expressed the dindu (didn’t do nothin’) philosophy and claimed such legislation would be inherently racist and akin to apartheid.

Even as late as January 2018, Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton was ridiculed as racist by the masochist fifth-column cabal when he commented that sentences being handed down were “too light” due to “political correctness that’s taken hold.”

“There’s no deterrence there at the moment,” said Dutton, adding that Victorian courts are filled with “hard-left activist judges” who engaged in an “ideological experiment” in sentencing.

The federal government needs to “weed out the people who have done the wrong thing,” including deporting people who are not Australian citizens, Dutton said, and linked the issue to federal Labor’s refusal to pass a stricter citizenship test. He said if people “are not prepared to integrate” by sending their children to school and preventing them from “wandering the streets at night committing offences,” then “they don’t belong in Australian society”.

Import the third world, get the third world and plenty of societal friction along with it.

Source:

Does the World Need A New Decree Of Peace? – Part VI to Part I

Dear Readers:

Today we finish reviewing this post by Dmitry Lyskov.  Where we left off, we saw that the new Bolshevik-led government, with its official Decree of Peace, hastened to fulfill a decade-old promise it had made … NOT to the German General Staff, as some anti-Communist ideologues still claim (without any facts to back up this assertion), but to the Second International, and to the world’s “conscious proletariat” represented by that organization.  The Bolshevik delegations to the Congresses of the Second International, especially those meetings of 1907 and 1912, had voted for the peace resolutions and hence obligated themselves to carry them out to the best of their abilities.  Which abilities had improved significantly since taking over the actual government of Russia (one of the warring parties) in October of 1917.

Next Lyskov deals with still another myth perpetuated by those same Great Russian chauvinist forces, amongst whom one can count such anti-Soviet dissidents as Alexander Solzhenitsyn.  It was the bug-eyed Jew-hating fanatic Solzhenitsyn who popularized to the West, not only the “Gulag” meme (which is not exactly a myth, Stalinism was a real thing, but was greatly exaggerated in his telling of it), but also the myth of Russia’s “Stolen Victory” in World War I.

According to this myth:  Russia was perched on the threshhold of victory against Germany.  Tsar Nicholas II was prepared to fight to the bitter end.  But then the Revolution happened, and prevented Russia from marching triumphantly into Berlin at the head of the Victors Parade.  In which case, according to everybody’s What-If Machines, Russia would haveshared the spoils of war with the other Entente victors; Russia would have snagged herself some juicy pieces when the planet was subsequently carved up like a Christmas goose.

Defeated German troops return to Berlin, December 1918

What this theory has going for it, is the actual fact that Germany did lose the war, in the end.  And was forced to pay reparations to the victors.  Hence, it might actually be logical to assume that Russia could have taken her rightful share of the pirates booty.

Aside from that one point, the facts do not support this theory.  One should always remind oneself, that the Tsar abdicated before the Revolution broke out in Petrograd.  Nicky simply quit the game, because he couldn’t deal with the disarray his policies had caused.  The revolution was sparked by the collapse in transport, the lack of food coming into the cities, actual hunger.  The war was lost, not at the front, but at the rear.  No revolutionary agitators, however skilled their oratory, even were they born with a hundred of Cicero’s golden tongues, could not have produced such an effect.

More to the point, the Tsar was forced to abdicate, not by revolutionary firebrands, but by his own General Staff.  I suppose one could say that even Tsarist Russia had something like a Deep State!

Another fact:  Decree #1 of the Petrograd Soviet, which is often cited as a defeatist document, since it ordered the troops to disperse, was technically directed just to the Petrograd garrison, not to the Russian army as a whole.  As it so happened, the decree then got passed from hand to hand over the entire front line, almost at the speed of light.  The men went “yay, we can go home!” and took off for home.  The officers had simply lost control over the soldiers.  There was no command left.  There was no military discipline.  The solid flesh of the Russian army had melted, thawed, and resolved itself into a dew.

Under such conditions, could Russia have possibly continued fighting the war unto the eventual victory?  Lyskov answers his own question.

Building A New Army

At the start of 1918 the Bolshevik government started to build a new army for the nation:  the Red Army.  On the surface this would not seem like a promising project, given that the entirety of Russian manhood had just voted en masse with their feet that they didn’t want to be in the army any more.

And now we see the paradoxical situation which even General Denikin had commented on:  That the same soldiers who kept whining for years that didn’t want to fight, suddenly wanted to fight.  What, oh what, could have changed their minds, what could possibly turn these army sad-sacks and deadbeats into Spartan warriors?  (Maybe the fact that they had just finished partitioning up the landlords estates and then come to find, that they have to take up the gun again, to keep their newly acquired land?)

Having something valuable to fight for, understanding precisely what one is fighting for, doesmake a difference, oddly enough.   Motivation is an important thing, psychologically speaking.  Still, it was an amazing feat for the Bolshevik government to reunite literally millions of soldiers with their weapons and send them back out there into the fray!  Only this time, not to fight against Germans, but to fight against their former masters and bosses!

Woman! Learn how to read!

How did the Bolsheviks do this?  With threats and cajolings?  Maybe that too.  But primary via the hackneyed and old-fashioned tactic of education.  In the year 1919 alone, the Red Army newspapers reached a circulation of almost 150 million.  In Soviet Russia, 68 million books and brochures were published.  In 1918, the Red Army became the Well-Read Army:  building 3033 libraries for the troops; by 1919 this number had increased to 7500 stationary libraries, and 2400 mobile libraries.  The Army also set up around 6000  “Literacy Schools” for the troops, along with theaters and other forms of education and entertainment.  The written word was, of course, supplemented by the speeches of the professional orators who accompanied the army and engaged the soldiers in political agitation.

All of these means of education served an important function:  They transformed the “dark masses” into enlightened masses; patriots of the new Soviet Republic, who were able to discuss, in a halfway-intelligent fashion, the political needs and interests of their brand-new country.  In this way, a new nation was formed from the lowliest members of the former Russian Empire.

Posted in Russian History | Tagged  | 4 Comments

Does the World Need A New Decree Of Peace? – Part V

Dear Readers:

Russian people: These are your rightful rulers…

Continuing to review and work through this post by Dmitry Lyskov, concerning Russian history of 100 years ago.  Lyskov has done a good job in countering historical revisionism, often of the hysterical brand, e.g., “Lenin hated Russia and Russians, Lenin wanted to destroy Russia, etc.”  People who emote those kind of views frequently equate “Russia” with the ruling Romanov dynasty and lament the untimely end of little Alexei and Olga and Tatiana and Maria, and the others.  I am guessing these are the same kind of people who send their small daughters to “Princess School” at Disney World and follow the marriages and spawnings of the ruling English monarchy in the tabloids.  Such people are hopeless sycophants to anybody calling him- or herself of “royal blood”, and simply cannot understand the concept of Democracy.  Nor the idea that ordinary people can actually be political actors; elect their own government; and even have some say in the decisions made by that government.  Through a process of vanity combined with projection, these innate anti-democrats identify their own inner selves with royalty, and somehow believe that they are internally a member of the elite, except that they are not!  They are just ordinary hicks.  Such people are born to be slaves and servants, and so they shall be.  Just probably not to anybody with actual royal blood!  Instead, they will serve the needs of corporate bullies.

Baby girls dressed as Disney Princesses

There are, however, some bourgeois democrats of the Westie variety, who believe the Romanov dynasty had it coming, but that the Rusian people should have then thrown their broad-shouldered support to the “democratic” Provisional Government.  A government which would then continue the Entente’s war against the enemy of mankind, Germany.  This point of view contains a not-so hidden assumption, that the Germans were the bad guys in all of this.  I’m not saying the Germans were any great shakes, but look at the alternative, from the point of view of the oppressed colonial serf:  Who was the most brutal colonialist beast when it came to Africa?  Probably the French and Belgiums, I reckon.  Compared to them, the Germans were practically benign.

First Attempts To End The Bloodshed

Speaking of the bourgeois democrats, we saw in our previous episode, that the new government which took over in February, did actually experience a burst of anti-war conscience.  The Socialists in that government remembered their past pledges, made in 1907 and 1912, to prevent/oppose imperialist wars.   Hence, one month later, in March 1917 they issued the very popular manifesto “To the peoples’s of the world”, calling for the proletarians of the world to step up to the plate, and end the slaughter.

After the Bolsheviks assumed governmental authority in October/November, they issued the first official governmental decree; as mentioned before, this was the famous “Decree Of Peace”.   The Decree was penned mainly by Lenin himself and shows his vigorous and crystal-clear no-B.S. writing style.  The Decree was presented to the Second Congress of Soviets of Workers, Soldiers and Peasants Deputies on 26 October (old style dates); was passed by the Congress; and published in Izvestiya the following day.

Lyskov debunks the popular notion that this decree ended the war immediately.  It wasn’t quite that simple.

The first paragraph of the Decree contained a shout-out to all warring sides and their governments to sit down at the bargaining table and hammer out a “just” peace that left all sides intact, with no annexations.  All sides (not just the defeated) were to pay into a reparations fund to help rebuild the nations after the war.

In essence, this was a call to return to the status-quo, without declarations of victory or defeat.  At the same time, the Bolshevik government expressed itself willing to consider any other reasonable propositions on the table; and in the meantime, there should be a ceasefire.  No more killing!  The Bolsheviks encouraged all warring soldiers to put aside their weapons and fraternize with each other.  “Fraternization” consisted of singing, dancing, drinking beer, having sleepovers in the trenches, and telling old army jokes.

Bolshevik propaganda encouraged Russian and German soldiers to dance the Polka together on the front lines.

The Decree was a complex document.  In essence it set the tone for Soviet foreign policy, and even post-Soviet foreign policy, for decades to come.  In essence, it called for complete transparency in the conduct of foreign relations — i.e., no secret deals.  To prove their bona fides in this matter, the Bolsheviks went so far as to publish the secret treaties signed by the Tsarist regime.

There was one piquant twist in the Bolshevik attitude towards international diplomacy:  As Communist revolutionaries, they maintained the right to speak directly to the peoples of the world, over the heads of their governments and bypassing the usual diplomatic channels.  This was a “revolutionary” idea, no pun intended.  For example,  this paragraph:

“The workers and peasants government of Russia appeals, in particular, to the conscious workers of the three most advanced nations of mankind, as well as the 16 most important participating governments in the war.”  The appeal to the “conscious workers” [as opposed ot the “unconscious workers”] over the heads of their governments, called upon them to step up to the plate and “assume their responsibilities, such as the liberation of mankind from the horrors of war and its consequences”.  It was the duty of these workers to help the new Soviet government bring peace to Europe.

Stolen Victory? Russian propaganda poster of 1915 shows Russia humiliating Germany.

Such phraseology came directly from the Stuttgart and Basel resolutions, proving that all that Socialist Congress verbiage was not just for naught.  The Bolshevik assertion that the war was purely imperialist and had no value whatsoever for the toiling masses, achieved a huge resonance in Russian society.  The “dark masses” chided by General Denikin for their “lack of patriotism” were reaffirmed, by the Bolsheviks, that their instincts had been correct all along.  This war did not belong to them, nor were they to blame for any defeats!  The guilt-tripping of the war-mongers now fell on deaf ears.

Lyskov:  “The Decree of Peace was indeed a fulfillment of a commitment made by the Bolsheviks.  But not to the German General Staff.  It was a commitment made to the Second International.  And this is why it found such resonance among the Russian people.”

Next:  Lyskov addressed the meme of the “Stolen Victory”… an ever-popular propaganda device of the Russian Nationalists and Great Russian Chauvinists.

[to be continued]

Posted in Russian HistoryUncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment

Does the World Need A New Decree Of Peace? – Part IV

Dear Readers:

Continuing to review and work through this post by Dmitry Lyskov.

Entente propaganda portrayed the Germans as gorillas.

Where we left off in our previous episode, we were attending the Seventh Congress of the Second Socialist International in Stuttgart Germany, where we were having a roaring great time and meeting some very interesting people.  This Congress passed many important resolutions, including one that obliged all socialists everywhere to oppose the looming world war (which the Congress accurately foresaw); and — here is the most important point— that if the war should break out despite all our best efforts, then we, socialists, are obliged to take advantage of the situation to do away with the imperialist governments that started it for their own mercenary ends.  In other words, the war would put the socialist revolution directly on the agenda in each one of the participating nations.  The corollary being so obvious that it hardly needs to be stated:  That no socialist should ever ever ever ever give support to his own government in the conduct of such a grotesque and unjust war.  Socialists are supposed to be immune from patriotic rah-rah propaganda that conceals an unsavory truth about Big Capital and its colonialist aims.

I think the discerning reader already guesses what I am leading up to, namely, the shocking reveal that many, if not most, socialists turned out, in the end, to be not so immune to the war frenzy, once the Big One did actually break out.  In the end, it takes more testicular fortitude than people can even imagine, to stand up to the ravings of mass hysteria, once soldiers start shooting and dying, and the government and police assume a self-righteous attitude about “supporting our boys”, etc.

The Basel Congress

But I am getting ahead of myself.  We need to return to the year 1912, two years before the real slaughter began.  Delegates of the Second (Socialist) International met again, this time in Basel, Switzerland, to formulate their response to the Balkan War.  This was an emergency meeting.  The Balkan War was a big deal, and turned out to be the precursor to World War I.  The Congress seated 518 delegates representing almost every nation in Europe.  As the piece (I just linked) notes:  “Congresses in Stuttgart in 1907 and Copenhagen in 1910 had agreed on opposition to war, but had not been able to resolve the differences between those who wanted the International to call for a strike in the event of war, and those who believed that such a commitment was unrealistic and should not be made.”

The Russian delegation was led by Alexandra Kollontai, of the Menshevik faction (later to switch to the Bolshevik faction).  Georgiy Plekhanov was also there, representing the Russian proletariat, as a good professional revolutionary is supposed to do.  You can think of Plekhanov as the Obi-Wan Kenobi to Lenin’s Luke Skywalker (or Darth Vader, depending on your political views).  Lenin regarded Plekhanov as a mentor and was said to fear his rebuke.  Which makes it doubly sad that the old friends eventually had to part ways.  Again, on the issue of the war.  The war was the true litmus test.  Of everything.  (As it turns out, when war did break out, Plekhanov supported the Russian government and the Entente powers against Germany.  Hence, it follows from this, that he would not have endorsed mass strikes intended to disrupt the war effort.)

Lenin did not attend the Basel Congress, but still followed the proceedings very closely.  One could expect nothing less from this professional revolutionary and Congress-connoisseur.  And Lenin could see, even from a distance, that the German Social Democratic Party (SDP) was starting to go squishy on the war issue, even before the war broke out!  Despite the dissenting Leftist faction, led by Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg, the majority SDP leaders were already angling to prevent resolutions mandating general strikes in the warring nations.  Now, this could be a legitimate tactical issue; it is not always a good idea to mandate certain tactics in advance.  Or it could show a certain lack of will…

In the end the Congress passed a compromise resolution which held back on the tactical issue of the General Strike, but was still radical enough to satisfy everybody, even Lenin.  Kollontai was pleased with the result, delighted with her own experiences, and wrote to a friend:  “One felt the need to frighten Europe, to threaten it with the ‘red specter,’ revolution, in case the governments should risk a war. And standing on the table which served as a platform I did threaten Europe!”

Turn Imperialist War Into Class War

We return to Lyskov’s analysis, and his reading of Lenin’s call to turn the imperialist war (when it broke out in 1914) into a “civil war”.  By “civil war”, Lenin did not have in mind the actual Russian Civil War (1918-22).  In his vocabulary, he meant “civil war” as a synonym for “class war”, aka Revolution.  Revolution is an intra-society war of the oppressed and exploited masses against those who oppress and exploit them.  It is a war intended to switch the government from one ruling class to a different ruling class.  Because the government is a civil institution, hence the phrase civil war.  All of this vocabulary is important.  Westies, especially, have lived for decades in a state of brain-washing, where the very language itself is used against them, to control their brains and make them see things in a certain way.  This especially pertains to ruling class propaganda against actual social revolutions, which are described in terms such as “seizing power” rather than “switching the government”, etc.  And the term class war is presented as something particularly bloody and undesirable; which it is, of course, except that the actual ruling class wages class war every minute of every day, just invisibly, most of the time.  Only very honest capitalists such as Mr. Warren Buffett even admit that this war is still on-going, when he was quoted as saying, “There has been class warfare for the last 20 years, and my class has won.”  Except, just expand that 20 years to, oh, say, 10,000 years or so!

Anyhow, leaving that last bit to professional anthropologists, we saw that many international socialists sort of had their fingers crossed when they voted for the anti-war resolutions in Stuttgart and Basel.  In the end, they could not find the testicular fortitude to call for the defeat of their own government and ruling class.  Lenin had no such qualms.  When war broke out, he openly called for the defeat — not of the nation of Russia, but of the Russian monarchy.  A fine distinction, of course, since, according to monarchs everywhere, l’état c’est moi, but others might beg to disagree.

Lenin was never one to waffle around with words:  His definition of the Russian defeat that he desired, was Über-clear:  “In Russia, due to its [economic] backwardness, and not having yet completed even the bourgeois revolution, the main tasks remain as before, with three main conditions for a functional democratic transformation:  A democratic Republic (with complete rights and self-determination of all nations); the confiscation of landowner plots; and an 8-hour working day.”  In other words, according to Lyskov, Lenin was not calling for the military defeat of Russia, there is nothing in there proposing German occupation and administration of the former Empire.  Lenin was calling for the fall of the Romanov monarchy and the formation of a Rusisan Democratic Republican government in its place.  Quite a distinction!

The February Revolution toppled a 300-year-old dynasty.

And this is precisely what Lenin had in mind when he called for the “defeat of one’s own government” and “turning the imperialist war into a civil war”.  All of which terrible phrases, which have frightened children for decades, conceal a much more benign meaning.  Lyskov also remarks, ironically, that nowadays the word “Revolution” sounds benign to most people, but “Civil War” sounds horrible; but a hundred years ago, it was the other way around!

When the February (1917) Revolution broke out, the Romanovs left town, and the reins of government passed into the hands mainly of the Mensheviks and Socialist-Revolutionaries.  And something clicked in their heads around this time, and these old socialists remembered the resolutions that they had voted for, in Stuttgart and Basel.  Hence, in March 1917 they published a manifesto addressed “To The Nations Of The World”.  The manifesto called on the proletarians of all nations to shrug off the yoke of the ruling classes, and to work together “to end this awful war, the shame of humanity”.

The Manifesto found resonance in Russian society and coincided with the thoughts and desires of the vast majority of the Russian people.

[to be continued]

Posted in Russian History | Tagged  | Leave a comment

Dear Readers:

Continuing with  this post by Dmitry Lyskov, who has been writing great pieces in VZGLIAD about the Russian Revolution(s) and ensuing Civil War.

Where we left off yesterday,we saw that ordinary Russian peasants did not always “get” the foreign policy aims or methods of the Romanov dynasty.  Nor were they able to grasp the cunning dynastic schemes nor the geo-political brilliance behind all of this Marching and Dying.  It’s one thing for a, say, Ivan Susanin to pledge his “Life For the Tsar” when Poles are invading your native village and threatening your children.  Quite another to die for the dynastic glory of the English monarchy.  So, these peasants didn’t understand why Russia had to go to war against Japan, or why it later had to align with England/France against Germany.  But they’re just dumb peasants, after all.  What about the noble and intelligent Russian working class?  Whether they knew it or not, or liked it or not (!), the Russian proletariat belonged to an international entity known as the “international proletariat”.  Whose political representatives and leaders consisted of the various socialist parties, mainly the parties of the Second International.

European socialists, being highly intelligent men and women, could clearly see what was going to happen, years before it did.  In 1907, at the Seventh Congress of the Second International, 884 representatives from 25 nations gathered in the beautiful city of Stuttgart, Germany, to write important resolutions, including ones involving women’s suffrage (in favor of), and colonialism (against).  The delegates passed a resolution which nobly attempted to prevent the bloodshed of the future imperialist war, which they all foresaw with Nostradamus-like clarity.

All the delegates, not just the Russian ones, had a very clear idea, that the slaughter to come was to be a purely imperialist war, that is to say, a war launched by very narrow segments of the ruling classes, including Big Capital, for purely mercenary ends:  Dynastic intrigues, the right to plunder colonies, scrapping like dogs over new markets for capitalist exploitation.  Nothing in any of this had even the tiniest earmark of a just or defensive war; nor any ends that could be supported by the toiling masses.  Most prescient of all, the delegates defined exactly how socialists should behave if and when the war broke out:  “If war should break out regardless [of our attempts to prevent it], then [the workers of the participating nations, along with their representatives] must actively call for the soonest possible end to it, and to strive, with all their strength, to take advantage of the ensuing economic and political crisis, to awake the masses, and to hasten the fall of capitalist rule over the masses.”

In other words, the Socialist International would do all in its power to prevent the war; but if and when the war broke out nonetheless, they would at least use it to their advantage, to hasten the socialist revolution.  An act of true prophecy:  the Oracle of Delphi could not have done a better job!

Future Soviet diplomat Maxim Litvinov was one of the delegates!

All of the Russian delegates to the Stuttgart Congress voted unanimously “DA” to the above resolution.  The Russian delegation consisted mostly of the Social-Democrats, whose leader was Georgy Plekhanov, along with his loyal apprentice, V.I. Lenin; but there were also at least a couple of  Socialist-Revolutionaries there (or former “Land and Freedom” party, representing the Russian peasantry).  A quick google could not find me a complete list of the Russian delegation, but the following individuals are mentioned in various sources:

Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich (for the Russian Social-Democrats)
Plekhanov, Georgy Valentinovich (ditto)
Martov/Tsederbaum, Juliy Osipovich (ditto)
Lunacharsky, Anatoly Vasilievich (ditto)
Litvinov, Maxim Maximovich (ditto)
Rubanovich, Ilya Adolfovich (Socialist-Revolutionary)

Of the above, a special shout-out should go to Maxim Litvinov. born with the hilarious Jewish name Meir Henoch Wallach-Finkenstein.  Of all the delegates, I believe he lived the longest thereafter, dying only in 1951!  Litvinov survived not only WWI but WWII as well, not to mention the Stalin purges, and even outlived many of the Western figures involved in both wars, with whom he had dealings, as a Soviet diplomat!

[What follows is cribbed mostly from wiki, except for the judginess and moral outrage]:

H.G. Wells was a close friend of Litvinov’s father-in-law

Finkelstein was born into a Lithuanian-Jewish banking family in Białystok (now Poland, but in those days part of the Russian Empire).  He joined the Russian Social-Democratic Labor Party (SDLP) in 1898.  The party was illegal at that time, so it was common for members to adopt aliases, and also might as well Russify their names, while they were at it; hence, Meir Finkelstein became Maxim Litvinov.  Litvinov joined the Bolshevic faction of the party as early as 1903.  He experienced everything in life that a Bolshevik could, including prison time and exile.  Most of his exile involved wasting away in that hell-hole London, where he married Ivy Low, the daughter of a Jewish university professor, Walter Low, who was a close friend of the writer H.G. Wells!  During his stint in London, Litvinov at one time (that same year as the Stuttgart Congress, 1907) shared a rented house with Joseph Stalin; and also apparently worked with Stalin as the bag-man on several bank robberies.  This tender friendship and camaraderie with Stalin may explain why Litvinov was not purged in the mid-1930’s, like most of the Old Bolsheviks were.  (Although he came close, in 1939, as we shall see.)  It also proves that Stalin was not the anti-Semite that some people accuse him of, since he did indeed have several close Jewish friends.  Litvinov could even be said to have been a member of Stalin’s inner circle.  Until he fell out of favor with Tsar Djugashvili.

A Veteran Diplomat

Litvinov is best known in his role as a veteran and highly seasoned Soviet diplomat.  Living in London as he did, when the October Revolution broke out, Litvinov was a natural choice to be the Soviet of Peoples Commissars unofficial Ambassador to Great Britain.  For many years subsequently, Litvinov represented the Soviet Union in many nations, and at many international conferences.  In 1930 he was promoted to People’s Commissar for Foreign Affairs.  Litvinov was known as a “moderate” in international affairs, pursuing excellent diplomacy even with noted class enemies such as the English and French governments.  In the early 1930’s the Soviet Union still preserved (this was to change during the Spanish Civil War) a division of labor between the Comintern (The Communist International, aka The Third International) and the Foreign Office.  As the leader of the latter, Litvinov knew his place in the scheme of things, and did a good job, as best he might.

Litvinov performed Marxist vaudeville shtick with fellow Jew, Harpo!

In 1933 Litvinov achieved an amazing diplomatic victory:  Official recognition by the United States of America!  Well, everyone knows that President FDR was a secret commie, as was later proved by Senator Joseph McCarthy!

According to wiki:   “[President] Franklin D. Roosevelt sent comedian Harpo Marx to the Soviet Union as a good-will ambassador, and Litvinov and Marx became friends and even performed a routine on stage together.”  One would give a fortune to see what kind of vaudevillian shtick those two clowns came up with, but, alas, as far as I know, those films or tapes have been lost to posterity!

Iago to Othello: “Thou art a cuck…”

In May 1939 an ever-more paranoid Stalin began to suspect his old bank-robbing buddy of disloyalty.  Hitler may have also had something to do with this, as he didn’t like dealing with Jews, yet he craved a temporary pact with the Soviet Union.  Hitler could envision a “Molotov-Ribbentrop” deal, but not a “Finkelstein-Ribbentrop” deal.  But Litvinov had an enemy closer to hand, and far more dangerous, than Hitler:  Vyacheslav Molotov.  We all know, and have had the misfortune, to work with these Iagos of the Office Place:  Back-stabbers, gossips, ferocious cliquists.  Suckers-up to the boss.  Otherwise known as “Kiss Up, Kick Down” (KUKD) kind of guys and gals!  OFFICE POLITICS, in other words.

Molotov (on the right): Office back-stabber and KUKD.

So, Litvinov was summarily fired, replaced with Vyacheslav Molotov.  To add to his humiliation, NKVD troops surrounded the home of the old revolutionary and cut his telephone lines.  Several of Litvinov’s aides were arrested and tortured, apparently in an attempt to get kompromat on their boss.  Molotov, an ethnically pure Russian who benefited at Finkelstein’s expense, was said to have expressed horror at the number of Jews he found working in the Foreign Office, and “thank God” they are being purged out!  Later, after Litvinov’s death, Molotov was to write, unsympathetically, that Litvinov was “not a bad diplomat — a good one” but also “quite an opportunist” who “greatly sympathized with Trotsky, Zinoviev, and Kamenev.Litvinov remained among the living [in the Great Purge] only by chance,”Molotov declared.  As opposed to Molotov himself, who knew how to stab a fellow office worker, twist in the knife, and then climb the corporate ladder on the backs of his victims!  As expertly as any Iago, using the weak point of the boss’s personality to gain some unfair advantage for self.

On the bright side, Litvinov survived this horrible ordeal.  Although kicked out of the inner circle, he got to stay alive, and even received a new (plum!) job as Ambassador to the United States.  If that Ambassador gig hadn’t worked out, he probably could have done Broadway tours with the Marx Brothers.  The old diplomat died in 1951, most likely of a heart attack, after a long and productive life.  They say that revolutions, like tigers, eat their young; and yet Litvinov was able to travel a long road from that Stuttgart Congress way back in 1907!

[to be continued]

Posted in Russian History | Tagged  | Leave a comment

Does the World Need A New Decree Of Peace? – Part II

Dear Readers:

So, after yesterday’s Intro, let us get started with  this post by Dmitry Lyskov, who has been writing great pieces in VZGLIAD about the history of events from 100 years ago.

As Lyskov mentioned, the Decree of Peace was the very first act of the new Bolshevik-dominated Soviet government, after they assumed responsibility to administer the former Russian Empire (October/November, 1917).  It was an important priority of the Bolsheviks to get Russia out of the war pronto.

Lyskov begins with the anti-war attitude of the Russian peasantry, at the start of the 20th century, which was shown in the earlier war (the Russo-Japanese war of 1905), as well as the big war, World War I.  He links this earlier piece of his, concerning the failure of the Stolypin agrarian reforms, and the rebellious attitude of the peasantry, who participated massively in the 1905Russian Revolution.  The disgruntled Russian peasants apparently did not harbor Rah-Rah “patriotic” feelings about the war against Japan.  The Romanovs may or may not have had valid geo-political concerns, but the bottom line is, they were unable to sell this war to the masses.

For example, the peasants of the village of Gariali of the Sudzhansky region (Kursk) wrote the following complaint (to the Duma) during their rebellion against the authorities:  “Our only means of survival is being able to rent land from our neighboring landowners.  But now they have stopped leasing the land, and we don’t know if that will resume.  We are sustained by earning wages, but now, because of the war, the work has stopped as well, everything is more expensive, and our taxes have increased…”

Similarly, the peasants of the village of Kazakov (Nizhniy Novgorod) wrote the following complaint:  “We subscribed to a newspaper (because there are literate ones among us), and started to read about the war, what is happening over there, and what kind of people the Japanese are.  It turns out that they walloped us.  And because of that, we will have to pay in full, we peasants and workers, in the form of various taxes…”

Residents of the village of Veshka (Tver) were even more ideologically inclined in their opinions of the Russo-Japanese war:  “This ill-fated, ruinous and destructive war must become an issue for all the people, for which it is necessary to gather representatives from the people and inform them about everything that is known about this war.  Then we can determine whether or not we should continue it, or seek peace.” 

And that was just a regional war.   When World War I rolled around, it was way bigger, the defeat was bigger, and the Russian peasantry were even less thrilled with the conflict.

The War To End Wars

General Denikin

At the beginning of WWI, Russia, like the other participants, experienced a wave of flag-waving patriotism.  The first regiments marched off to the front with orchestras playing and people running alongside shouting “Hurrah!”  But a lot of this patraiotism was just skin deep.  White General Anton Denikin was later to pen this plaint:  “Blinded by the thunder and crash of the usual patriotic phrases… we overlooked the internal, organic deficiency of the Russian people:  A lack of patriotism….  They did not want this war.   With the exception of the heated-up military youth craving to be heroes, [most of the people] believed that the government would take all measures to avert actual combat.”  Denikin, apparently believing that Russia’s alliance with such back-stabbers as England and France was an act of “self-defense”, went on to lament:  “The notion of national self-defense was not understood by the dense masses [literally: the dark people], who went off to war obediently, but without any sense of enthusiasm and without a clear notion of the necessity to make great sacrifices.”

According to Lyskov, Denikin was correct in the sense, that most peasants of this era did not regard the entire Russian Empire as their fatherland; for them, the “fatherland” was mostly just their village and region.  And they had little care for the vast geo-political concerns of the Romanovs.  As Denikin also noted, the Tambov peasant did not feel any concern that the German soldier would reach his village or do anything to him.  [And he was probably right about that:  This was WWI not WWII!]

Ordinary Russian peasants simply did not understand why they had to sit in trenches and get killed by incoming artillery strikes.

[Next:  the Role of the Socialist parties in the anti-war movement — to be continued]

Posted in Russian History | Tagged  | 4 Comments

Does the World Need A New Decree Of Peace? – Part I

Dear Readers:

Today I start a new series, based on this post by our old friend Dmitry Lyskov from VZGLIAD.  Lyskov has written a stunning series of historical posts about the events of 100 years ago.  In which he subtly refutes those who have sought to distort this history.  I just barely finished (a few days ago) reviewing his piece on the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917.  Today’s piece is about the Bolshevik Decree of Peace, which was issued after the October/November Revolution of 1917.  The Decree was the first official act issued by the new Soviet government.

Russia entered the war with only the noblest of intentions …. !

It was always fashionable among the elites of Russia’s former “allies”, especially England and France, to call this decree a “treacherous” or “treasonous” act.  As if Russia owed so much to England and France, how dare the barbarians pull out of the war and leave their dear civilized friends hanging in the wind?  Nowadays, sadly, you will also find many “Great Russian chauvinists” among the Russians themselves, and even in the pro-Russian blogosphere, who lament the Bolshevik “treachery” against their erswhile allies.

This point of view is not new, actually.  Among the anti-Soviet dissidents, Solzhenitsyn was notable, in his novel August 1914, of promoting this view.  Some call it the “Lost World” view, as it is also fashionable among monarchists who rue the downfall of the Romanov dynasty.  These people, who all possess accurate “What-If” time machines in their homes, assert that if only the treacherous Bolsheviks had not pulled Russia out of the war, if only they had not “stolen defeat from the jaws of victory“, then Russia would have defeated Germany, would have saved the monarchy, would haveavoided revolution and bloody Civil War.  These are generally the same Great Russian chauvinists who call Lenin a Jew, a German spy, and worse.  As if being pro-German (or a Jew, for that matter!) is somehow way more reprehensible than being pro-English!  (Besides, technically, despite Lenin’s admittedly Germanophile tilt, the Bolsheviks as a Party were officially neutral, not pro-German.  Still, even if….)

Anyhow, what would have been so horrible about a German victory?  My own What-If machine, which is of German make and very finely calibrated, like all German technology, tells me that a German victory in WWI would have prevented a later Hitler!  In which case, there would be no need for me to build this new time machine, go back in time, and kill Hiter, because Hitler would have just remained an obscure and harmless house painter.  See, two can play this game of Teleological Chess!

But back to Comrade Lyskov…  Who asks the pertinent question:  What was so important about the Decree of Peace that the Bolsheviks chose this as the very first decree of the new government they led?  Lyskov lists the various theories surrounding this act:  A humanitarian diplomatic initiative intended to end the international slaughter.  Fulfillment of an obligation made previously to the German General Staff.  A deliberate betrayal of the Entente allies.  The first step to a “Separate Peace” as later came to pass in Brest-Litovsk.  The reality, Lyskov says, is much more complicated than each and all of these various theories combined.

[to be continued]

Source: https://awfulavalanche.wordpress.com/page/2/

Continuity of Government Redefined to Suspend US Constitution

Source: Intellihub

The whole concept of Continuity of Government (COG) was originated by the British government during World War II, then was later adopted by the US and other world governments. President Dwight D. Eisenhower was the first US president to start implementing such a plan as COG, he put it on the table.

PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, CO – A serviceman stands outside a pair of giant blast doors at the command center of the Northern Command December 9, 2002 located deep within Cheyenne Mountain at the foot of the Rocky Mountains near Colorado Springs, Colorado. The Cold War-era station now monitors homeland security as well as foreign nuclear threats. Every commercial plane in U.S. air space is monitored from the center. Crews reporting unruly passengers or planes that drop from radio contact are given special attention since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. (Photo by Kevin Moloney/Getty Images)
PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, CO – A serviceman stands outside a pair of giant blast doors at the command center of the Northern Command December 9, 2002 located deep within Cheyenne Mountain at the foot of the Rocky Mountains near Colorado Springs, Colorado. The Cold War-era station now monitors homeland security as well as foreign nuclear threats. Every commercial plane in U.S. air space is monitored from the center. Crews reporting unruly passengers or planes that drop from radio contact are given special attention since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. (Photo by Kevin Moloney/Getty Images)

A handful of people, an elite group, empowered by president Ronald Reagan while he was in office, redefined the, then current, Continuity of Government COG) program, to to suspend the Constitution of the United States of America during any crisis. This was a clear step by rogue elements within the US Military Industrial Complex to try and secure total control over the United States, its assets, infrastructure, and citizens, by one day, circumventing the US constitution.

These are the very same elements that have also prepared ‘mass graves’ for you and your family as I reported in March of 2009, on the Alex Jones Show and Prison Planet TV. In unison, an article I authored for Infowars.com garnered national attention, as others around the country responded, turning up yet more evidence that these graves were being installed nationwide. These mass grave sites are likely part of COG, and are definitely part of Mass Fatality and Pandemic Preparedness Plans implemented by various state and local government agencies under the direction of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). These plans dovetail into prior formulated plots laid out by some of our nation’s top head officials.

After Ronald Regan was elected president, he installed Louis Giuffrida, as the head of FEMA, an old cold warrior. Through Giuffrida and others, key members of a rogue power structure would manipulate the law to circumvent the constitution at a future date. That event was 9/11.

As innocent as the former Hollywood actor turned president Reagan seemed, his handlers, at the time, were a very dangerous threat to our nation’s future. In fact, President Reagan and close constituants were also responsible for launching a secret Readiness Exercise in 1984, dubbed, REX84. A plan that would also work in tandem with multiple federal agencies during a time of civil unrest or ‘mass exodus’ of immigrants from Mexico. Essentially allowing the construction of concentration (FEMA) camps in America, later enforced by laws and provisions such as the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

The Rise of FEMA

TruthOut.org reported (a view into the past), “In January 1981, as the Reagan administration begins, it becomes increasingly clear that a major theme will be: Carter was wrong about everything. Placate the Soviets? Wrong. Solar power? Wrong. Social welfare programs? Wrong. FEMA …?

FEMA, now less than two years old, was still searching for its identity when Hurricane Reagan hit the agency. More and more military officers were seen daily signing in at the guards’ desk. Director Macy was replaced by Louis Giuffrida, a retired Army officer. As the Reagan administration took an increasingly confrontational public stance against the Soviets, FEMA under Giuffrida took a similar approach. Coordinating the response to natural disasters was becoming less and less important. FEMA’s real mission? Prepare for “The Big One,” the nuclear war with the Soviets.

FEMA would be an early version of TV hero Jack Bauer, fighting hard to save America from external threats. The problem was, the US government already had plenty of Jack Bauer’s (24) at the FBI, the CIA and the Defense Department … and they had no love for this upstart FEMA that would suddenly dash to the front of the line and grab all the glory for our country’s defense.

So FEMA, facing public anger from the anti-nuclear-war left, also faced disdain from the federal intelligence and law enforcement establishment. The agency soon became known as the “Turkey Farm,” where politically reliable (but not very skilled) political appointees would be sent to play their war games while the real action took place elsewhere.

To be sure, there were some bright spots in the FEMA leadership … Jeff Bragg, who established an employee performance management system in the Federal Insurance Administration, Sam Speck, who headed FEMA’s State and Local Programs Directorate and who understood the value of reaching out to our non-federal partners instead of trying to order them around.”

Today FEMA is a fairly well organized machine. However some have doubts after seeing how the agency handled hurricane Katrina. All of these agencies have since been running drills, that all tie into the COG control grid, as well as Echelon and other surveillance platforms.

Once the, then current, COG plan was redefined by Regan’s people, there would need to be a catastrophic event such as “another Pearl Harbor” to kick off the suspension of the American Constitution behind the backs of the American people with a dastardly plan to takeover the nation. This attack came in the form of 9/11.

The Suspension of the US Constitution

September 11, 2001, during the ‘terror attacks’ that took place on American soil, the most recent version of COG, at the time, was enacted. This was the event the establishment needed to proceed with their diabolic plans.

These plans have been operational, and still in effect ever since 9/11, as we are in a technical state of emergency, the constitution remains technically suspended.

In fact, Wikipedia reads, “The George W. Bush administration put the Continuity of Operations plan into effect for the first time directly following the September 11 attacks. Their implementation involved a rotating staff of 75 to 150 senior officials and other government workers from every federal executive department and other parts of the executive branch in two secure bunkers on the East Coast. Friends, family and co-workers were only able to reach them through a toll-free number and personal extensions. The Bush administration did not acknowledge the implementation of the COG plan until March 1, 2002.

Since its inception, the newly created Department of Homeland Security has conducted at least three exercises to test continuity plans. The first, named “Forward Challenge ’04″, took place from May 12 to May 13, 2004, and included more than 40 government agencies. The second major exercise took place from June 20 to June 24, 2005. Titled “Pinnacle”, the exercise tested responses to various emergencies, including a hypothetical act of terrorism. “Forward Challenge ’06″ was the third major exercise, and took place on June 19, 2006. It reportedly involved nearly 4,000 government personnel.

In September 2010, President Barack Obama informed Congress that the State of Emergency in effect since September 14, 2001, will be extended another year.The National Emergencies Act grants various powers to the president during times of emergency,and was intended to prevent a president from declaring a state of emergency of indefinite duration.

In 2007, Professor Larry J. Sabato criticized the incomplete nature of the plan in his book A More Perfect Constitution. In particular, he objected to the fact that there is no Constitutional procedure for replacing U.S. House members in the case of a large-scale attack which could potentially kill a large number of representatives. In regard to the Continuity of Operations Plan, Sabato said it “failed outright” during the September 11 attacks.

The NORAD- and USNORTHCOM-sponsored exercise “Vigilant Shield 2008″ took place from October 15 to October 20, 2007.”

According to some, these national level exercises have ramped up, which likely signifies the eminence of a substantial coming event.

An excerpt from Wikipedia reads Describes the actual Continuity of Operations plan or COOP;

Each facility is a counterpart to its peacetime equivalent.

Raven Rock Mountain Complex → The Pentagon (Department of Defense)

Mount Weather → Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (Used temporarily for Members of Congress in Sept. 2001) Camp David → Executive Office of the President

Unknown → United States Congress (The Greenbrier was to be used until 1992, when it was decommissioned) Cheyenne Mountain → North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD)

United States Strategic Command Center (Offutt Air Force Base) → United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM)

The Former site:

National Audio-Visual Conservation Center (Mount Pony) → Department of Treasury/Federal Reserve (sold off in 1997 to the National Audiovisual Conservation Center) Project Greek Island (Greenbrier Bunker – Exposed in the press and removed from service)

Also, mobile systems are used for additional command and control.

E-4, EC-135, and E-6 are all airborne command centers.

Air Force One is the term for any USAF plane the President of the United States travels on. However, the term normally refers to a Boeing VC-25A the President normally uses. While the VC-25A is equipped with numerous systems to ensure its survival, in an emergency, it would be recommended that s/he use the National Airborne Operations Center, a Boeing E-4specially built to serve as a survivable mobile command post. The Secretary of Defense may also use it, as a member of the National Command Authority. It is also possible that the President would authorize the Vice President to use it, depending on the circumstances. An E-6 Mercury, is USSTRATCOM’s Airborne Command Post, designed to take over in case USSTRATCOM’s headquarters is destroyed or incapable of communicating with strategic forces. NORAD owns and operates a Mobile Consolidated Command Center

The Army has now set up a command center called United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) to further carryout these actions if necessary or required.

COG measures were invoked on September 11, 2001, during the terrorist attacks, and likely the attacks were part of a larger drill based scenario that went live in the public theatre (domain).

Congressmen, Brad Sherman, and members of the Homeland Security Committee have previously requested to see the COG plans and that they be made public. While most members of the government would admit a COG plan should be in place, they remain leery of a secret detailed plan to that suspends the US Constitution. Members of the government and the Homeland Security Committee have previously been denied access to this plan. A plan that is designed to keep our nation functioning at all costs, so they say.

Highly detailed plans to keep the nations top staff, and infrastructure operational regardless of any event, do exist.

According to insider testimony top former US cabinet level officials, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and others, often role-played fictional doomsday scenarios, based on possibilities including the annihilation of seated government officials in Washington, and or the nation’s crucial command and operations infrastructure.

These random life-like drills, often ending in some undisclosed underground location. These were the beginning stages of what is now known as the US governments Continuity of Government program (COG).

While Dick Cheney and others saw a need for encased security and preparedness measures for our nations central command in a time of crisis, they also were drooling over the potential profits that could be made for their private corporations.

However, there is more to all of the ‘doomsday’ planning then that. We must ask why elites and people in-the-know have also been privately gearing up for the same such scenarios.

According to Brian Camdin of Hardened Structures, whom I interviewed a few years back. The elites are gearing up for something, privately, at a rapid rate. Camdin, has even made over 200′ long ‘doomsday arcs’ made of steel that can sit on the ocean floor for five moths then rise again after the smoke has cleared.

What are they gearing up for?

Source:  www.sagaciousnewsnetwork.com/continuity-of-government-redefined-to-suspend-us-constitution/

Sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Rumsfeld

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuity_of_Operations_Plan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/2474:part-one-fema-and-disaster–a-look-at-what-worked-and-what-didnt-from-a-fema-insider

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVRy2OEBjyo

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act

*****

The FBI: An American Cheka

FBI

Nearly twenty years ago, then-FBI Director Louis Freeh – still basking in his agency’s residual glory from the Mt. Carmel Massacre of April 1993 – visited Moscow to sign a joint cooperation accord with the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB). After touring the Lubyanka Square headquarters of the Russian secret police, Freeh observed that “Our nations have more in common than ever before.”

At the time I thought it was shocking that Freeh would traduce his country, and his agency, by offering that comparison to the renamed KGB. Roughly two decades later I’ve come to understand that if the comparison is offensive, the Russians have the stronger claim to be the insulted party.

Like their Russian and Soviet siblings, the FBI’s primary role is that of fabricating crimes in the service of the state. Since 1991 – more particularly, since 2001 – the FBI has engaged in this behavior far more extensively than the Russians, both in terms of the volume of fabrications and the geographical reach of its operations. And evidence is accumulating that the Bureau has added assassination to its proto-totalitarian toolkit.

2FSB

In his study The Gulag Archipelago, Alexandr Solzenitsyn records that “the creation of fabricated cases began back in the early years of the Organs” – that is, immediately after the Soviet secret police agency was created in 1917. The routine fabrication of offenses was done by the Chekists “so that their constant salutary activity might be perceived as essential. Otherwise, what with a decline in the number of enemies, the Organs might, in a bad hour, have been forced to wither away.”

From its inception, the Soviet secret police agency was engaged in what we now call “Homeland Security Theater.” The same could be said of the FBI, which actually had a nine-year head start on its Soviet counterpart. J. Edgar Hoover’s two chief priorities were the collection of what the Soviets would call kompromat on significant public figures – politicians, policy-makers, celebrities – and the management of his secret police agency’s public image. With the advent of COINTELPRO in the 1950s, the FBI became fully engaged in a campaign of surveillance, harassment, disruption, and assassination (if only by proxy) targeting political dissidents. Since that time, the FBI has been a fully realized political police organization, in every evil sense of that expression.

Like their Chekist forebears, FBI Special Agents don’t solve crimes; instead, they extract confessions through intimidation or blackmail. Where confessions aren’t forthcoming, FBI interrogators will routinely deploy the usefully ambiguous and self-ratifying charge of making a “materially false statement to a federal agent” to punish those who refuse to submit.

Mind you, FBI agents – like all other law enforcement personnel in the United States – are trained and encouraged to lie as an “investigative” technique. They face no criminal, civil, or administrative punishment for lying in the course of an interrogation. Once again, they share this trait with their Soviet and Russian kindred.

“We lambs are forbidden to lie, but the interrogator could tell all the lies he felt like,” observed Solzhenitsyn. “Those articles of the law did not apply to him…. He could confront us with as many documents as he chose, bearing the forged signatures of our kinfolk and friends – and it would be just a skillful interrogation technique” rather than a prosecutable deception.

A victim who is manipulated, intimidated, and barraged with unfamiliar and often contradictory details and accusations will inevitably say something that could be considered incriminating – or that he might later contradict in some trivial way. Those who are drawn into FBI interrogation sessions suffer from an additional disadvantage: The Bureau’s inquisitors, as a matter of inflexible policy, refuse to permit an objective record of their investigative interviews.

302

“FBI agents always interview in pairs,” writes the indispensable constitutional scholar Harvey Silverglate. “One agent asks the questions, while the other writes up what is called a `form 302 report’ based on his notes. The 302 report, which the interviewee does not normally see, becomes the official record of the exchange; any interview who contests its accuracy risks prosecution for lying to a federal official, a felony. And here is the key problem that throws the accuracy of all such statements and reports into doubt: FBI agents almost never electronically record their interrogations; to do so would be against written policy.”

A 2006 internal FBI memo obtained by the New York Times insisted that laying bare the Bureau’s interrogation sessions to the unenlightened eyes and untutored ears of the lay public would be an offense akin to tearing the veil away from the Holy of Holies. The common public might mistakenly believe that “perfectly lawful and acceptable interviewing techniques” may involve “unfair deceit,” and question “the quality of evidence” produced thereby.

In the Stalin-era Soviet Union, Solzhenitsyn recalled, victims of secret police interrogation would be handed a “206” form to sign attesting to the accuracy of the official report, and the propriety of the methods used to extract information during the session. Defense Attorney Sam Fields points out that subjects of FBI interrogations – whether they are potential witnesses or potential defendants — will sometimes be given a copy of the resulting 302 document prior to trial.

“If your interview lasted more than thirty seconds, it is guaranteed you will find numerous discrepancies,” Fields advises us. “Some of them will be insignificant; some of them could be material…. Whether or not the `302’ discrepancies are a result of stupidity or cupidity makes no difference. Testify in opposition to the `302’ and you are in the crosshairs of the Feds. If they believe your testimony cost them the case, the next thing you [are] likely to hear from the FBI will be: `Please place your hands behind your back.’”

Furthermore, as trial attorney Norm Pattis warns us, 302s can be used to incriminate and convict defendants, but never to exonerate them. In 2007, Pattis notes, a federal prosecutor in Connecticut “moved in limine to preclude the defense from using a 302 to impeach witnesses.” What that meant, in substance, was that the US Attorney in that case admitted “that FBI 302s aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on” – unless, of course, they can be used in a retaliatory prosecution of a witness or defendant who has somehow thwarted a U.S. Attorney’s ambition, or frustrated an FBI agent.

Another Chekist-approved method favored by the contemporary FBI is the entrapment of innocent people, either as a pure exercise in Homeland Security Theater or in order to compel them to act as informants or provocateurs. Over the past decade, this has become the FBI’s métier. The case of Portland, Oregon resident Mohamed Osman Mohamud is a museum-quality exhibit of the first approach. The Bureau’s relentless harassment of Muslims at a mosque briefly attended by Mohamud offers numerous examples of the latter tactic in action.

Mohamud’s case has been previously examined in detail. Here’s a brief capsule summary:

At age 18, as the Somali-born Portland resident got caught in an undertow of jihadist radicalism, his father made the fatal error of contacting the FBI to express concerns. The Bureau very thoughtfully braced the young man with two of its “terrorism facilitators,” who took charge of the young man’s indoctrination. Then they prevented him from flying to Alaska to take a commercial fishing job.

After eliminating any possibility that this alienated young man could have found a way to make an honest living, the FBI’s Homeland Security Theater troupe played out the familiar script: They played to the entirely justifiable outrage felt by this young man over the US government’s treatment of Muslims in Somalia, then carefully manipulated him into pushing a button on what he thought was a bomb at Portland’s 2010 Christmas tree lighting ceremony.

Fikre and his attorney in Sweden

While one element of the Portland, Oregon FBI office was targeting Mohamud, another was focusing its malign attention on a young Eritrean-born man named Yonas Fikre, who, like Mohamud, had attendedPortland’s As-Saber mosque. In April 2010, Fikre traveled to Sudan, where he planned to start a cell phone business. His first stop was at the US Consulate in Khartoum, where a State Department representative advised him to file paperwork for a Sudanese business license.

Shortly thereafter, Fikre received a phone call from a man named David Noordeloos, who represented himself as an official at the embassy. He told Fikre that he was one of several U.S. citizens in Sudan who had been invited to a luncheon at the US Embassy the following day in order to receive a briefing about safety concerns.

When Fikre showed up at the Embassy the following morning, he was taken into a small room and held for interrogation by Noordeloos and another man named Jason Dundas, who identified themselves as FBI Special Agents. Fikre immediately demanded that he have access to his attorney before being questioned. The FBI agents told him that he had been placed on the “no-fly list” and thus couldn’t return to the United States in order to confer with his attorney.

Leaving aside the fact that there is a common technology called a “telephone” that would make the distances involved irrelevant, it’s worth underscoring the fact that the FBI uses the “no-fly list” as a kind of virtual Berlin Wall: The Bureau used it to trap Mohamud in the continental U.S., so he could be indoctrinated by its terrorism facilitators, and they used it to trap Fikre overseas so he couldn’t have access to his attorney.

During that April 22, 2010 conversation (appropriately enough, it occurred on Lenin’s birthday), Noordeloos explained that the FBI wanted to conscript Fikre as an informant within the As-Saber mosque. He promised that he would be well-compensated to act as a stukach, that he would enjoy “the good life” if he were to become a snitch. He also made it plain that refusal to cooperate would have awful consequences.

“Don’t you love your wife?” Noordeloos asked ominously at one point in the interrogation. (“One could break even a totally fearless person through his concern for those he loved,” observed Solzhenitsyn of NKVD interrogation techniques.)

Since Fikre couldn’t go back to the U.S., he was released from the US Embassy. A few days later, he received an e-mail from Noordeloos that said, among other things, that “The time to help yourself is now.”

Over the next two months, Fikre noticed that he was being followed by plainclothes police. In June 2010 he left Sudan, eventually arriving in the United Arab Emirates. A year later, after moving to the city of Al Ain in Abu Dhabi, Fikre was kidnapped from his home by agents of the UAE secret police, who blindfolded him and took him to a dungeon, where he was held captive and tortured for 106 days.

The interrogators who tormented Fikre had been given detailed information about him by the FBI, and repeatedly demanded that he cooperate with the Bureau. When he resisted answering questions, or inquired as to whether his jailers were working as proxies for the FBI, he was “repeatedly beaten severely on his head, back, legs, and feet with plastic pipes, required to assume stress positions for hours, and threatened with death by strangulation by use of a flexible pipe,” Fikre recalls in a recently filed lawsuit. “One particularly painful torture method his interrogators used was to force plaintiff to lie on his stomach with his sandals off, whereupon he was beaten severely on the soles of his feet; thereafter, he was required to stand on his feet, which … caused him great pain.”

FBI

One repeated line of inquiry dealt with Mohamed Osman Mohamud – the 18-year-old  from Portland who had been lured into playing a leading role in a Homeland Security Theater production. It is quite possible that the FBI was trying to torture Fikre into providing “evidence” against their patsy, in the event that they confronted that rarest of things, a conscientious federal jury.

In July 2011, Fikre’s family and friends, working through an attorney, reported that he had gone missing and was likely in the custody of the UAE secret police. A consulate employee made a perfunctory visit to his cell, and concluded that the victim – who had dropped thirty pounds, and had been told that he would be tortured to death if he revealed the abuse he had received – was in “good shape.” The consulate representative was assured that Fikre would be released “tomorrow.” He was held for another eight weeks. When he went to the airport, Fikre was told that he was forbidden to return to the U.S. because his name was still on the no-fly list. An involuntary exile, Fikre was eventually offered political asylum by a relatively free country, Sweden.

Fikre was one of at least five men who attend the As-Saber mosque whose names have been inscribed in what we could call the “Berlin Wall Registry” – or what the Regime calls the “no-fly list.” None of them has been charged with terrorism or related crimes. None has been told why he is on the list.

Tarhuni

Among the other victims was Libyan-born US citizen Jamal Tarhuni, who was kidnapped by the Feds in Tunis while trying to return from a humanitarian trip to his war-afflicted homeland in January 2012. Tarhuni had provided translation and consulting services on behalf of a Christian charitable organization called Teams International. After being told that his name was on the Berlin Wall Registry, he was drawn into a protracted interrogation by a set of FBI agents under the lead of Special Agent Brian Zinn.

In Tarhuni’s case, the victim was told that he would be released if he took a polygraph test. A female FBI agent requested that Tarhuni sign an electronic release form on her computer. As he examined the document, Tarhuni realized that it was a waiver of several constitutionally protected rights. He quite sensibly refused to sign the form. As punishment, he was effectively imprisoned for three weeks in Tunis before his Portland-based attorney, Thomas Nelson, was able to arrange for him to fly home via Paris and Amsterdam.

Tarhuni was obviously more fortunate than Fikre, but they both should regard themselves as blessed in light of the FBI’s recent execution-style murder of Orlando resident Ibragim Todashev, a Chechen-born acquaintance of alleged Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev.

Todashev

Yes, this was an extra-judicial murder.Todashev was unarmed, surrounded by FBI agents, Massachusetts State Troopers, and officers from the Orlando Police Department. The original story – ventilated by an anonymous source to a credulous Regime-aligned news outlet — was that Todashev, who was supposedly prepared to confess involvement in an unsolved triple murder, suddenly snapped and threatened the bold and valiant G-Men with a knife. That story has since been “rectified”; the new version is that the unarmed and outnumbered young man threatened the Chekists with a metal rod – or perhaps he threw a table at one of the interrogators — and simply had to be gunned down.

None of this would explain why there was a bullet entry wound in the back of Todashev’s head, a location suspiciously close to the spot preferred by the NKVD executioners who fed condemned political prisoners a “Lubyanka breakfast” – that is, a cigarette and a bullet to the back of the head.

That variety of lethal room service was a standard feature of the basement cells of the facility toured by then-FBI Director Louis Freeh on July 4, 1994, before he correctly observed that his agency and the one that maintained that dungeon had “more in common than ever before.” Truer words have rarely, if ever, departed the tax-devouring skull cave of a federal bureaucrat.

Source: http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-fbi-american-cheka.html