There are three types of Marxism — and they are all dangerous
“Jewish World Domination can only be reached by destructive ways.”
— Franklin Ryckaert
Marxism is a Jewish movement of inciting the so-called “oppressed” to rebel against the so-called “oppressors” in order to destroy obstacles to Jewish dominance, which is the real purpose of it all. There are three variants of Marxism :
1) Social Marxism, or “class-struggle”. This form of Marxism was used in Russia in order to overthrow the Czar and the ruling class to make place for Jewish overlords. It was a stunning success, though later under Stalin the power of Jews became somewhat limited.
2) Cultural Marxism. This form of Marxism is used to undermine all forms of culture that stand for a healthy national life : relations between the generations, between the sexes, sexuality and gender identity. This too became a stunning success and at present we live under its hegemony.
3) Racial Marxism. This form of Marxism is mostly counted as being part of Cultural Marxism, but its nature and scope justify a separate treatment. In the case of Racial Marxism the “oppressors” are identified as Whites, while all non-Whites are counted as “oppressed”. The “solution” to the problem of White oppression is what we call here the White Genocide Project, i.e. the “soft” genocide of Whites by flooding their countries with non-White immigrants and then promoting miscegenation. This form of Marxism is at present in full operation.
In all three forms of Marxism the gullible Goyim are promised a Utopia of freedom if only the obstacles to it are – not reformed – but destroyed. In the case of Social Marxism this meant the literal destruction of the bourgeoisie class as happened in Russia, China and Cambodia. In Cultural Marxism all healthy forms of social life are destroyed. In Racial Marxism too the aim is not to “reform” the white race in order to give up its evil racist ways, but to destroy it all together, though in the “soft” form of genocide-by-miscegenation.
Jewish World Domination can only be reached by destructive ways and this is an indication of the demonic nature of its activists. Here is a quote from the Jew Saul Alinsky in his subversive book Rules for Radicals :
Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.